Phase-based visualization and analysis of Java programs

Science of Computer Programming

Volumn 59, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 64-81

  Nagpurkar, Priya ^a   Krintz, Chandra ^a  

^a University of California   (United States)

Author keywords

Java; Program analysis; Program behaviour visualization; Program phases

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; DATA ACQUISITION; DATA PROCESSING; DATA REDUCTION; ELECTRONIC COMMUNITIES; OPTIMIZATION; PROGRAM COMPILERS; TIME VARYING NETWORKS;

FRAMEWORK; PROGRAM ANALYSIS; PROGRAM BEHAVIOR VISUALIZATION; PROGRAM PHASES;

JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE;

EID: 27744573510     PISSN: 01676423     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scico.2005.07.004     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. A. Adl-Tabatabai, M. Cierniak, G. Lueh, V. Parikh, J. Stichnoth, Fast, Effective code generation in a just-in-time Java compiler, in: ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, PLDI, May 1998, pp. 280-290
2. B. Alpern, C. Attanasio, J. Barton, M. Burke, P. Cheng, J.-D. Choi, A. Cocchi, S. Fink, D. Grove, M. Hind, S. Hummel, D. Lieber, V. Litvinov, M. Mergen, T. Ngo, J. Russell, V. Sarkar, M. Serrano, J. Shepherd, S. Smith, V. Sreedhar, H. Srinivasan, and J. Whaley The Jalapeño Virtual Machine IBM Systems Journal 39 1 2000 211 221
3. M. Arnold, S. Fink, D. Grove, M. Hind, P. Sweeney, Adaptive optimization in the Jalapeño JVM, in: ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications, OOPSLA, October 2000, pp. 47-65
4. M. Arnold, M. Hind, B. Ryder, Online feedback-directed optimization of Java, in: ACM Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications, OOPSLA, November 2002, pp. 111-129
5. V. Bala, E. Duesterwald, and S. Banerjia Dynamo: A transparent dynamic optimization system ACM SIGPLAN Notices 35 2000 1 12
6. A. Dhodapkar, J. Smith, Managing multi-configuration hardware via dynamic working set analysis, in: 29th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, ISCA, May 2002, pp. 233-244
7. A. Dhodapkar, J. Smith, Comparing program phase detection techniques, in: 36th Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture, MICRO, December 2003, p. 217
8. E. Duesterwald, C. Cascaval, S. Dwarkadas, Characterizing and predicting program behavior and its variability, in: International Conference on Parallel Architecture and Compilation Techniques, PACT, September 2003, p. 220
9. K. Ebcioglu, E. Altman, M. Gschwind, and S. Sathaye Dynamic binary translation and optimization IEEE Transactions on Computers 50 2001 529 548
10. M. Hind, V. Rajan, P. Sweeney, Phase shift detection: A problem classification, IBM Research Report 22887, August 2003
11. IBM Jikes Research Virtual Machine (RVM) http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/jikesrvm
12. The Java HotSpot Virtual Machine Technical White Paper http://java.sun.com/products/hotspot/docs/whitepaper/ Java_HotSpot_WP_Final_30_01.ps
13. T. Kistler, and M. Franz Continuous program optimization: A case study ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS) 2003 500 548
14. U. Kremer, J. Hicks, J. Rehg, A Compilation framework for power and energy management on mobile computers, in: 14th International Workshop on Parallel Computing, LCPC, August 2001, pp. 115-131
15. C. Krintz, Coupling on-line and off-line profile information to improve program performance, in: International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization, CGO, March 2003, pp. 69-78
16. A. Madison, and A. Bates Characteristics of program localities Communications of the ACM 19 5 1976 285 294
17. P. Nagpurkar, C. Krintz, Visualization and analysis of phased behavior in Java Programs, in: ACM International Conference on the Principles and Practice of Programming in Java, PPPJ, June 2004, pp. 27-33
18. T. Nguyen PANIC Laboratory at Rutgers University http://www.panic-lab.rutgers.edu/
19. H. Saputra, M. Kandemir, N. Vijaykrishnan, M. Irwin, J. Hu, H. Hsu, U. Kremer, Energy conscious compilation based on voltage scaling, in: ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Language, Compiler and Tool Support for Embedded Systems, LCTES, June 2002, pp. 2-11
20. X. Shen, Y. Zhong, C. Ding, Locality phase prediction, in: 11th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages, ASPLOS, October 2004, pp. 165-176
21. T. Sherwood, E. Perelman, B. Calder, Basic block distribution analysis to find periodic behavior and simulation points in applications, in: International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques, PACT, September 2001, pp. 3-14
22. T. Sherwood, E. Perelman, G. Hamerly, B. Calder, Automatically characterizing large scale program behavior, in: 10th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages, ASPLOS, October 2002, pp. 45-57
23. T. Sherwood, S. Sair, B. Calder, Phase tracking and prediction, in: 30th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, ISCA, June 2003, pp. 336-349
24. M. Smith, Overcoming the challenges to feedback-directed optimization, in: ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Dynamic and Adaptive Compilation and Optimization (Dynamo), January 2000, pp. 1-11
25. J. Whaley, Partial method compilation using dynamic profile information, in: ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages and Applications, OOPSLA, October 2001, pp. 166-179
26. F. Xie, M. Martonosi, S. Malik, Compile-time dynamic voltage scaling settings: opportunities and limits, in: ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, PLDI, June 2003, pp. 49-62
27. L. Zhang, C. Krintz, Profile-driven code unloading for resource-constrained JVMs, in: ACM International Conference on the Principles and Practice of Programming in Java, PPPJ, June 2004, pp. 83-90