The phonological similarity effect in serial recognition

Memory

Volumn 13, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 773-784

  Nimmo, Lisa M ^a,b   Roodenrys, Steven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CONSONANT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; PHONEME; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SHORT TERM MEMORY; SPEECH; TASK PERFORMANCE; VOWEL; WORD RECOGNITION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 27744545514     PISSN: 09658211     EISSN: 14640686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09658210444000386     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Baddeley, A. D. (1966). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic and formal similarity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 362-365.
2. Baddeley, A. D., Lewis, V., & Vallar, G. (1984). Exploring the articulatory loop. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 233-252.
3. Besner, D., & Davelaar, E. (1982). Basic processes in reading: Two phonological codes. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 701-711.
4. Brown, G. D. A., & Hulme, C. (1995). Modeling item length effects in memory span: No rehearsal needed? Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 594-621.
5. Brown, G. D. A., Preece, T., & Hulme, C. (2000). Oscillator-based memory for serial order. Psychological Review, 107, 127-181.
6. Burgess, N., & Hitch, G. J. (1992). Toward a network model of the articulatory loop. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 429-460.
7. Burgess, N., & Hitch, G. J. (1999). Memory for serial order: A network model of the phonological loop and its timing. Psychological Review, 106, 551-581.
8. Campbell, R., & Butterworth, B. (1985). Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia in highly literate subjects: A developmental case with associated deficits of phonemic processing and awareness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 435-476.
9. Coltheart, V. (1993). Effects of phonological similarity and concurrent irrelevant articulation on short-term memory recall of repeated and novel word lists. Memory and Cognition, 21, 539-545.
10. Conrad, R., & Hull, A. J. (1964). Information, acoustic confusion and memory span. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 429-432.
11. Fallon, A. B., Groves, K., & Tehan, G. (1999). Phonological similarity and trace degradation in the serial recall task: When CAT helps RAT, but not MAN. International Journal of Psychology, 34, 301-307.
12. Fallon, A. B., Mak, E., Tehan, G., & Daly, C. (2005). Lexicality and phonological similarity: A challenge for the retrieval-based account of serial recall? Memory, 13, 349-356.
13. Gathercole, S. E., Gardiner, J. M., & Gregg, V. H. (1982). Modality and phonological similarity effects in serial recall: Does one's own voice play a role? Memory and Cognition, 10, 176-180.
14. Gathercole, S. E., Pickering, S. J., Hall, M., & Peaker, S. M. (2001). Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54 A, 1-30.
15. Gathercole, S. E., Service, E., Hitch, G., Adams, A., & Martin, A. J. (1999). Phonological short-term memory and vocabulary development: Further evidence on the nature of the relationship. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 65-77.
16. Gupta, P., & MacWhinney, B. (1997). Vocabulary acquisition and verbal short-term memory: Computational and neural bases. Brain and Language, 59, 267-333.
17. Hartley, T., & Houghton, G. (1996). A linguistically constrained model of short-term memory for nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 1-31.
18. Henson, R. N. A. (1998). Short-term memory for serial order: The start-end model. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 73-137.
19. Henson, R. N. A., Hartley, T., Burgess, N., Hitch, G., & Flude, B. (2003). Selective interference with verbal short-term memory for serial order information: A new paradigm and tests of a timing-signal hypothesis. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 1307-1334.
20. Hulme, C., Maughan, S., & Brown, G. D. A. (1991). Memory for familiar and unfamiliar words: Evidence for a long-term memory contribution to short-term memory span. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 685-701.
21. Hulme, C., Roodenrys, S., Brown, G. D. A., & Mercer, R. (1995). The role of long-term memory mechanisms in memory span. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 527-536.
22. Lian, A., & Karlsen, P. J. (2004). Advantages and disadvantages of phonological similarity in serial recall and serial recognition of nonwords. Memory and Cognition, 32, 223-234.
23. Lian, A., Karlsen, P. J., & Winsvold, B. (2001). A re-evaluation of the phonological similarity effect in adults' short-term memory of words and nonwords. Memory, 9, 281-299.
24. Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley.
25. Martin, R. C., & Breedin, S. D. (1992). Dissociations between speech perception and phonological short-term memory deficits. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 509-534.
26. Martin, R. C., Lesch, M. F., & Bartha, M. C. (1999). Independence of input and output phonology in word processing and short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 3-29.
27. Murray, A., & Jones, D. M. (2002). Articulatory complexity at item boundaries in serial recall: The case of Welsh and English digit span. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28, 594-598.
28. Nairne, J. S. (1988). A framework for interpreting recency effects in immediate serial recall. Memory and Cognition, 16, 343-352.
29. Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory. Memory and Cognition, 18, 251-269.
30. Nairne, J. S. (2002). Remembering over the short-term: The case against the standard model. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 53-81.
31. Nairne, J. S., & Kelly, M. R. (2004). Separating item and order information through process dissociation. Journal of Memory & Language, 50, 113-133.
32. Nimmo, L. M., & Roodenrys, S. (2004). Investigating the phonological similarity effect: Syllable structure and the position of common phonemes. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 245-258.
33. Nimmo, L. M., & Roodenrys, S. (in press). Investigating the phonological similarity effect with nonwords. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
34. Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
35. Page, M. P. A., & Norris, D. (1998). The primacy model: A new model of immediate serial recall. Psychological Review, 105, 761-781.
36. Saint-Aubin, J., & Poirier, M. (2000). Immediate serial recall of words and nonwords: Tests of the retrieval-based hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 332-340.
37. Schweickert, R. (1993). A multinomial processing tree model for degradation and redintegration in immediate recall. Memory and Cognition, 21, 168-175.
38. Service, E., Maury, S., & Luotoniemi, E. (2005). Forgetting and redintegration of consonants and vowels in pseudoword lists. Memory, 13, 340-348.
39. Tehan, G., & Fallon, A. B. (1999). A connectionist model of short-term cued recall. In J. Wiles & T. Dartnell (Eds.), Prospectives in cognitive science (pp. 221-237). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
40. Thorn, A. S. C., Gathercole, S. E., & Frankish, C. R. (2002). Language familiarity effects in short-term memory: The role of output delay and long-term knowledge. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1363-1383.
41. Treiman, R. (1984). On the status of final consonant clusters in English syllables. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 343-356.