Implications of search accuracy for serial self-terminating models of search

Visual Cognition

Volumn 12, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 1386-1403

  Dukewich, Kristie R ^a   Klein, Raymond M ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTRACTIBILITY; EXPOSURE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LINEAR SYSTEM; PARALLEL DESIGN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL MASKING; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

EID: 27744543220     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280444000788     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bergen, J. R., & Julesz, B. (1983). Rapid discrimination of visual patterns. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 13(5), 857-863.
2. Broadbent, D. (1987). Simple models for experimentable situations. In P. Morris (Ed.), Modelling cognition (pp. 169-185). Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
3. Cheal, M., & Lyon, D. R. (1992). Attention in visual search: Multiple search classes. Perception and Psychophysics, 52(2), 113-138.
4. Chun, M. M., & Wolfe, J. M. (1996). Just say no: How are visual searches terminated when there is no target present? Cognitive Psychology, 30(1), 39-78.
5. Davis, E. T., Fujawa, G., & Shikano, T. (2002). Perceptual processing and search efficiency of young and older adults in a simple-feature search task: A staircase approach. Journals of Gerontology: Series B. Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57B(4), 324-337.
6. Di Lollo, V. (1980). Temporal integration in visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109(1), 75-97.
7. Di Lollo, V., Hogben, J. H., & Dixon, P. (1994). Temporal integration and segregation of brief visual stimuli: Patterns of correlation in time. Perception and Psychophysics, 55(4), 373-386.
8. Dukewich, K. R., & Klein, R. M. (2004, June). What you do after finding the target can affect finding it. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour, and Cognitive Science, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
9. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychology, 18(4), 433-458.
10. Eckstein, M. P. (1998). The lower visual search efficiency for conjunctions is due to noise and not serial attentional processing. Psychological Science, 9(2), 111-118.
11. Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (1990a). Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. Science, 247, 721-723.
12. Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (1990b). VSEARCH: Macintosh software for experiments in visual search. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 22(2), 188-122.
13. Gibson, B. S., Li, L., & Skow, E. (2000). Searching for one versus two identical targets: When visual search has a memory. Psychological Science, 11(4), 324-327.
14. Grossberg, S., Mingolla, E., & Ross, W. D. (1994). A neural theory of attentive visual search: Interactions of boundary, surface, spatial and object representations. Psychological Review, 101(3), 470-489.
15. Herzog, M. H., Koch, C., & Fahle, M. (2001). Shine-through: Temporal aspects. Vision Research, 41(18), 2337-2346.
16. Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search has no memory. Nature, 394(6693), 575-577.
17. Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2003). Memory for rejected distractors in visual search? Visual Cognition, 10(3), 257-298.
18. Humphreys, G. W., & Mueller, H. J. (1993). Search via Recursive Rejection (SERR): A connectionist model of visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 43-110.
19. Julesz, B. (1984). A brief outline of the text on theory of human vision. Trends in Neuroscience, 7(2), 41-45.
20. Klein, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334(6181), 430-431.
21. Klein, R. M., & Farrell, M. (1989). Search performance without eye movements. Perception and Psychophysics, 46(5), 476-482.
22. Klein, R. M., & MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10(4), 346-352.
23. Kristjansson, A. (2000). In search of remembrance: Evidence for memory in visual search. Psychological Science, 11(4), 328-332.
24. Kwak, H. W., Dagenbach, D., & Egeth, H. (1991). Further evidence for a time-independent shift of the focus of attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 49(5), 473-480.
25. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1(4), 476-490.
26. McCarley, J. S., Wang, R. F., Kramer, A. F., Irwin, D. E., & Peterson, M. S. (2003). How much memory does occulomotor search have? Psychological Science, 14(5), 422-426.
27. McElree, B., & Carrasco, M. (1999). The temporal dynamics of visual search: Evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25(6), 1517-1539.
28. Palmer, J. (1994). Set-size effects in visual search: The effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks. Vision Research, 34(13), 1703-1721.
29. Palmer, J., Verghese, P., & Pavel, M. (2000). The psychophysics of visual search. Vision Research, 40, 1227-1268.
30. Pashler, H. (1987). Target-distractor discriminability in visual search. Perception and Psychophysics, 41(4), 285-302.
31. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85(2), 59-108.
32. Schweickert, R. (1985). Separable effects of factors on speed and accuracy: Memory scanning, lexical decision, and choice tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 28(3), 223-281.
33. Shore, D. I., & Klein, R. M. (2001). On the manifestations of memory in visual search. Spatial Vision, 14(1), 59-75.
34. Sternberg, S. (1969). Memory scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction time experiments. American Scientist, 57(4), 421-457.
35. Townsend, J. T. (1974). Issues and models concerning the processing of a finite number of inputs. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 132-185). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
36. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
37. Treisman, A., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(3), 459-478.
38. Treisman, A., & Souther, A. (1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114(3), 285-310.
39. Turvey, M. T. (1973). On peripheral and central processes in vision: Inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli. Psychological Review, 80(1), 1-52.
40. Verghese, P., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Stimulus discriminability in visual search. Vision Research, 43(18), 2453-2467.
41. Von Muehlenen, A., Mueller, H. J., & Mueller, D. (2003). Sit-and-wait strategies in dynamic visual search. Psychological Science, 14(4), 309-314.
42. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1(2), 202-238.
43. Wolfe, J. M. (1998). What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search? Psychological Science, 9(1), 33-39.
44. Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided Search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual catch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(3), 419-433.
45. Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2003). Serial deployment of attention during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29(1), 121-138.
46. Zelinsky, G. J., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1997). Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(1), 244-262.