The temporal dynamics of visual search: Evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1517-1537

  McElree, Brian ^a   Carrasco, Marisa ^b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0033252543     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1517     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Bergen, J. R., & Julesz, B. (1983, June 23). Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination. Nature, 303, 696-698.
2. Carrasco, M., & Chang, I. (1995). The interaction of objective and subjective organizations in a localization search task. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1134-1150.
3. Carrasco, M., Evert, D. L., Chang, I., & Katz, S. M. (1995). The eccentricity effect: Target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1241-1261.
4. Carrasco, M., & Frieder, K. S. (1997). Cortical magnification neutralizes the eccentricity effect in visual search. Vision Research, 37, 63-82.
5. Carrasco, M., McLean, T. L., Katz, S. M., & Frieder, K. S. (1998). Feature asymmetries in visual search: Effects of display duration, target eccentricity, orientation and spatial frequency. Vision Research, 38, 347-374.
6. Carrasco, M., Ponte, D., Rechea, C., & Sampedro, M. J. (1998). "Transient structures": The effects of practice and distractor grouping on within-dimension conjunction searches. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1243-1258.
7. Carrasco, M., & Theofanou, D. (1997). The temporal relationship among detection, identification and localization in visual search. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, 38, S369.
8. Carrasco, M., & Yeshurun, Y. (1998). The contribution of covert attention to the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 673-692.
9. Cavanagh, P., Arguin, M., & Treisman, A. ( 1990). Effect of surface medium on visual search for orientation and size features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 479-491.
10. Cave, K. R., & Wolfe, J. M. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 225-271.
11. Chandler, J. P. (1969). Subroutine STEPIT-finds local minimum of a smooth function of several parameters. Behavioral Science, 14, 81-82.
12. Cheal, M. L., & Lyon, D. R. (1992). Benefits from attention depend on the target type in location-precued discrimination. Acta Psychologica, 81, 243-267.
13. Corbett, A. T., & Wickelgren, W. A. (1978). Semantic memory retrieval: Analysis by speed-accuracy tradeoff functions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 1-15.
14. Crick, F. (1984). Function of the thalamic reticular complex: The searchlight hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 81, 4586-1590.
15. DeValois, R. L., & DeValois, K. K. (1988). Spatial vision. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Dosher, B. A. (1976). The retrieval of sentences from memory: A speed-accuracy study. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 291-310.
17. Dosher, B. A. (1979). Empirical approaches to information processing: Speed-accuracy tradeoff or reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 43, 347-359.
18. Dosher, B. A. (1981). The effect of delay and interference: A speed-accuracy study. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 551-582.
19. Dosher, B. A. (1982). Effect of sentence size and network distance on retrieval speed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 173-207.
20. Dosher, B. A. (1984). Degree of learning and retrieval speed: Study time and multiple exposures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 541-574.
21. Dosher, B. A., Han, S., & Lu, Z. L. (1998, November). Time course of visual search among homogeneous and heterogeneous distractors. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Dallas, TX.
22. Dosher, B. A., & Rosedale, G. (1989). Combined retrieval cues as a mechanism for priming in retrieval from memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 191-211.
23. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
24. Eckstein, M. P. (1998). The lower visual search efficiency for conjunctions is due to noise and not serial attentional processing. Psychological Science, 9, 111-118.
25. Egeth, H., Folk, C. L., & Mullin, P. A. (1989). Spatial parallelism in the processing of lines, letters, and lexicality. In B. E. Shepp & B. Soledad (Eds.), Object perception: Structure and process (pp. 19-52). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Egeth, H., Virzi, R. A., & Garbart, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively defined targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 32-39.
27. Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (1990a, February 9). Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. Science, 247, 721-723.
28. Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (1990b). Sensitivity to three-dimensional orientation in visual search. Psychological Science, 1, 323-326.
29. Gegenfurtner, K. R., & Sperling, G. (1993). Information transfer in iconic memory experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 845-866.
30. Geisler, W. S., & Chou, K. L. (1995). Separation of low-level and high-level factors in complex tasks: Visual search. Psychological Review, 102, 356-378.
31. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
32. Hockley, W. E. (1984). Analysis of response time distributions in the study of cognitive processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 598-615.
33. Hockley, W. E., & Corballis, M. C. (1982). Tests of serial scanning in item recognition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 189-212.
34. Hoffman, J. E. (1978). Search through a sequentially presented visual display. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 1-11.
35. Hoffman, J. E. (1979). A two-stage model of visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 319-327.
36. Humphreys, G. W., & Müller, H. J. (1993). Search via recursive rejection (SERR): A connectionist model of visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 43-110.
37. Humphreys, G. W., Quinlan, P. T., & Riddoch, M. J. (1989). Grouping processes in visual search: Effects with single- and combined-feature targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 258-279.
38. Joseph, J. S., Chun, M. M., & Nakayama, K. (1997, June 19). Attentional requirements in a "preattentive" feature search task. Nature, 387, 805-807.
39. Judd, C. M., & McClelland, G. H. (1989). Data analysis: A model-comparison approach. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
40. Kinchla, R. A. (1974). Detecting target elements in multi-element arrays: A confusability model. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 149-158.
41. Kinchla, R. A. (1980). The measurement of attention. In R. S. Nikerson (Ed.), Attention and performance IIX. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Kinchla, R. A. (1992). Attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 711-742.
43. Kinchla, R. A., Chen, Z., & Evert, D. L. (1995). Pre-cue effects in visual search: Data or resource limited? Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 441-450.
44. Klein, R. M., & Farrell, M. (1989). Search performance without eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 476-482.
45. Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
46. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
47. Mayfrank, L., Kimmig, H., & Fischer, B. (1987). The role of attention in the preparation of visually guided saccadic eye movements in man. In J. K. O'Regan & A. Levy-Schoen (Eds.), Eye movements: From physiology to cognition (pp. 37-45). New York: North-Holland.
48. McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287-330.
49. McElree, B. (1993). The locus of lexical preference effects in sentence comprehension: A time-course analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 536-571.
50. McElree, B. (1996). Accessing short-term memory with semantic and phonological information: A time-course analysis. Memory & Cognition, 24, 173-187.
51. McElree, B. (1998). Attended and non-attended states in working memory: Accessing categorized structures. Journal of Memory & Language, 38, 225-252.
52. McElree, B., & Dosher, B. A. (1989). Serial position and set size in short-term memory: Time course of recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 346-373.
53. McElree, B., & Dosher, B. A. (1993). Serial retrieval processes in the recovery of order information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 291-315.
54. McElree, B., & Griffith, T. (1995). Syntactic and thematic processing in sentence comprehension: Evidence for a temporal dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 134-157.
55. McElree, B., & Griffith, T. (1998). Structural and lexical constraints on filling gaps during sentence processing: A time-course analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 432-460.
56. Meyer, D. E., Irwin, D. E., Osman, A. M., & Kounois, J. (1988). The dynamics of cognition and action: Mental processes inferred from speed-accuracy decomposition. Psychological Review, 95, 183-237.
57. Mordkoff, J. T., Yantis, S., & Egeth, H. E. (1990). Detecting conjunctions of color and form in parallel. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 157-168.
58. Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1971). A parallel-processing model for scanning. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 289-291.
59. Palmer, J. (1994). Set-size effects in visual search: The effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks. Vision Research, 34, 1703-1721.
60. Palmer, J. (1995). Attention in visual search: Distinguishing four causes of a set-size effect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 118-123.
61. Palmer, J. (1998). Attentional effects in visual search: Relating search accuracy and search time. In R. D. Wright (Ed.), Visual attention. New York: Oxford University Press.
62. Palmer, J., Ames, C. T., & Lindsey, D. T. (1993). Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 108-130.
63. Pashler, H. (1987a). Detecting conjunctions of color and form: Reassessing the serial search hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 191-201.
64. Pashler, H. (1987b). Target-distractor discriminability in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 285-292.
65. Pashler, H. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66. Pavel, M. (1990, November). A statistical model of preattentive visual search. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans, LA.
67. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108.
68. Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446-461.
69. Ratcliff, R. (1981). A theory of order relations in perceptual matching. Psychological Review, 85, 212-225.
70. Ratcliff, R. (1988). Continuous versus discrete information processing: Modeling the accumulation of partial information. Psychological Review, 95, 238-255.
71. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1989). Similarity information versus relational information: Differences in the time course of retrieval. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 139-155.
72. Ratcliff, R., & Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1976). Retrieval processes in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 83, 190-214.
73. Reed, A. V. (1973, August). Speed-accuracy trade-off in recognition memory. Science, 181, 574-576.
74. Reed, A. V. (1976). The time course of recognition in human memory. Memory & Cognition, 4, 16-30.
75. Rumelhart, D. E. (1970). A multicomponent theory of the perception of briefly exposed visual displays. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 7, 191-218.
76. Saarinen, J., & Julesz, B. (1991). The speed of attentional shifts in the visual field. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 88, 1812-1814.
77. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66.
78. Shaw, M. L. (1982). Attending to multiple sources of information: I. The integration of information in decision making. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 353-409.
79. Shaw, M. L., & Shaw, P. (1977). Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 201-211.
80. Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentation. Psychological Monographs, 74(1, Whole No. 498).
81. Sperling, G., & Dosher, B. A. (1986). Strategy and optimization in human information processing. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 1-65). New York: Wiley.
82. Sternberg, S. (1966, August 5). High speed scanning in human memory. Science, 153, 652-654.
83. Sternberg, S. (1973, November). Evidence against self-terminating memory search from properties of the RT distribution. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, MO.
84. Sternberg, S. (1975). Memory-scanning: New findings and current controversies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 1-32.
85. Theios, J. (1973). Reaction time measurement in the study of memory processes: Theory and data. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 7, pp. 44-85). New York: Academic Press.
86. Townsend, J. T. (1972). Some results concerning the identifiability of parallel and serial processes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25, 168-199.
87. Townsend, J. T. (1990). Serial versus parallel processing: Sometimes they look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished. Psychological Science, 1, 46-54.
88. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). The stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
89. Treisman, A. (1982). Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 194-214.
90. Treisman, A. (1991). Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 652-676.
91. Treisman, A. (1993). The perception of features and objects. In A. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention, selection, awareness, and control (pp. 6-34). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
92. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
93. Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.
94. Treisman, A., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 459-478.
95. Treisman, A., & Souther, J. (1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 285-310.
96. van Zandt, T., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Self-terminating versus exhaustive processes in rapid visual and memory search: An evaluative review. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 563-580.
97. Verghese, P., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Stimulus discriminability in visual search. Vision Research, 18, 2453-2467.
98. Ward, R., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). Conjunctive search for one and two identical targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 664-672.
99. Wickelgren, W. (1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica, 41, 67-85.
100. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
101. Wolfe, J. M. (1996). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 13-74). London: University College London Press.
102. Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419-433.
103. Wolfe, J. M., Yu, K. P., Stewart, M. I., Shorter, A. D., & Cave, K. R. (1990). Limitations of the parallel guidance of visual search: Color x Color and Orientation x Orientation conjunctions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 879-892.
104. Yeshurun, Y., & Carrasco, M. (1998). Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution. Nature, 396 (6706), 72-75.
105. Yeshurun, Y., & Carrasco, M. (1999). Spatial attention improves performance in spatial resolution tasks. Vision Research, 39, 293-305.
106. Zenger, B., & Fahle, M. (1997). Missed targets are more frequent than false alarms: A model for error rates in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1783-1791.