Ipsilateral shoulder and elbow replacements: On the risk of periprosthetic fracture

Clinical Biomechanics

Volumn 20, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1055-1063

  Plausinis, D ^a,b   Greaves, C ^a   Regan, W D ^a   Oxland, T R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Elbow replacement; Finite element method; Periprosthetic fracture; Shoulder replacement; Stress concentration

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FRACTURE; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STRESS CONCENTRATION;

ANTHROPLASTY; ELBOW REPLACEMENT; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; SHOULDER REPLACEMENT;

MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM;

BONE CEMENT;

ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BONE BOWING; BONE STRUCTURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELBOW; HUMAN; HUMERUS; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RISK FACTOR; STRESS; TORSION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELBOW JOINT; HUMANS; HUMERAL FRACTURES; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SHOULDER FRACTURES; SHOULDER JOINT; WRIST INJURIES;

EID: 27744436677     PISSN: 02680033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.06.012     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. F.T. Ballmer, J.A. Sidles, S.B. Lippitt, and F.A. Matsen Humeral head prosthetic arthroplasty: surgically relevant geometric considerations J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2 1993 296 304
2. P. Boileau, and G. Walch The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus: implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design J. Bone Joint Surg. 79-B 1997 857 865
3. B. Cameron, and J.P. Iannotti Periprosthetic fractures of the humerus and the scapula: management and prevention Orthop. Clin. North Am. 30 1999 305 318
4. C.P. Duncan, and B. Masri Fracture of the femur after hip replacement Instr. Course Lect. 44 1995 293 304
5. D.S. Garbuz, B.A. Masri, and C.P. Duncan Periprosthetic fracture of the femur: principles of prevention and management Instr. Course Lect. 47 1998 237 242
6. D.R.J. Gill, R.H. Cofield, and B.F. Morrey Ipsilateral total shoulder and elbow arthroplasties in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis J. Bone Joint Surg. 81-A 1999 1128 1137
7. V.K. Goel, I.-K. Lee, and W.F. Blair Effect of the Coonrad elbow prosthesis on stresses in the humerus Clin. Biomech. 4 1989 11 16
8. T. Hanyu, K. Nakazono, and H. Ishikawa Humeral shaft fracture after a total elbow arthroplasty J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 7 1998 541 544
9. R.C. Hibbeler Mechanics of Materials third ed. 1997 Prentice Hall New Jersey
10. R. Huiskes Some fundamental aspects of human joint replacement Acta Orthop. Scand. Suppl. 185 1980 129 208
11. R. Huiskes Design, fixation, and stress analysis of permanent orthopedic implants: the hip joint P. Ducheyne G.W. Hastings Functional Behavior of Orthopedic Biomaterials vol. II 1984 CRC-Press Boca-Raton, FL 121 162
12. R. Huiskes, and N. Verdonschot Biomechanics of artificial joints: the hip V.C. Mow W.C. Hayes Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics second ed. 1997 Lippincott-Raven Philadelphia, PA 395 460
13. A.E. Inglis, and A.E. Inglis Jr. Ipsilateral total shoulder and total elbow replacement arthroplasty: a caveat J. Arthroplasty 15 2000 123 125
14. J.H. Keyak, M.G. Fourkas, J.M. Meagher, and H.B. Skinner Validation of an automated method of three-dimensional finite element modeling of bone J. Biomed. Eng. 15 1993 505 509
15. R.B. Little, H.W. Wevers, D. Siu, and T.D.V. Cooke A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the upper tibia J. Biomech. Eng. 108 1986 111 119
16. B.P. McNamara, L. Cristofolini, A. Toni, and D. Taylor Relationship between bone-prosthesis bonding and load transfer in total hip reconstruction J. Biomech. 30 1997 621 630
17. E.J. McPherson, R.J. Friedman, Y.H. An, R. Chokesi, and R.L. Dooley Anthropometric study of normal glenohumeral relationships J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 6 1997 105 112
18. S.W. O'Driscoll, and B.F. Morrey Periprosthetic fractures about the elbow Orthop. Clin. North Am. 30 1999 319 325
19. M.L. Pearl, and A.G. Volk Coronal plane geometry of the proximal humerus relevant to prosthetic arthroplasty J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 5 1996 320 326
20. D.T. Reilly, and A.H. Burstein The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue J. Biomech. 8 1975 393 405
21. D.D. Robertson, J. Yuan, L.U. Bigliani, E. Flatow, and K. Yamaguchi Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal part of the humerus: relevance to arthroplasty J. Bone Joint Surg. 82-A 2000 1594 1602
22. C.M. Robinson, C.I. Adams, M. Craig, W. Doward, M.C.C. Clark, and J. Auld Implant-related fractures of the femur following hip fracture surgery J. Bone Joint Surg. 84-A 2002 1116 1122
23. A. Rohlmann, U. Mossner, G. Bergmann, and R. Kolbel Finite element analysis and experimental investigation in a femur with hip endoprosthesis J. Biomech. 16 1983 727 742
24. J. Sanchez-Sotello, S. O'Driscoll, and B.F. Morrey Periprosthetic humeral fractures after total elbow arthroplasty: treatment with implant revision and strut allograft augmentation J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 84-A 2002 1642 1650
25. H.M. Tensi, H. Gese, and R. Ascherl Non-linear three-dimensional finite element analysis of a cementless hip endoprosthesis Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine 203 1989 215 222
26. S.P. Timoshenko, and J.M. Gere Mechanics of Materials 1973 Van Nostrand Reinhold Company New York
27. M. Viceconti, L. Cristofolini, M. Baleani, and A. Toni Pre-clinical evaluation of a new partially cemented femoral prosthesis by synergistic use of numerical and experimental methods J. Biomech. 34 2001 723 731
28. M. Viceconti, L. Monti, R. Muccini, M. Bernakiewicz, and A. Toni Even a thin layer of soft tissue may compromise stability of cementless hip stems Clin. Biomech. 16 2001 765 775
29. P.S. Walker, W.W. Yoon, S.R. Cannon, G. Bentley, and S.K. Muirhead-Allwood Design and application of combined hip-knee intramedullary joint replacement J. Arthroplasty 14 1999 945 951
30. D.C. Wirtz, N. Schiffers, T. Pandorf, K. Radermacher, D. Weichert, and R. Forst Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur J. Biomech. 33 2000 1325 1330