A scholarship of practice: Creating discourse between theory, research and practice

Occupational Therapy in Health Care

Volumn 19, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 7-16

  Kielhofner, Gary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Empowerment evaluation; Knowledge generation; Knowledge creating systems; Participatory action research; Scholarship of practice; Theory

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; EDUCATION PROGRAM; MODEL; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; RESEARCH; THEORY;

EID: 27644582021     PISSN: 07380577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J003v19n01_02     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Balcazar, F. E., Keys, C. B., & Garate-Serafini, S. (1995). Learning to recruit assistance to attain transition goals: A program for adjudicated youth with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 237-246.
2. Balcazar, F. E., Keys, C. B., Kaplan, D. L., Suarez-Balcazar, Y. (1998). Participatory action research and people with disabilities: Principles and challenges. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 12, 105-112.
3. Barnett, R. (1994) The Limits of Competence Knowledge, Higher Education and Society. Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
4. Barnett, R. (1997). Higher occupational education: A critical business. The Society for Research into Higher Education. UK: Open University Press.
5. Boyce, W. & Lysack, C. (2000). Community participation: Uncovering its meanings in CBR. In Thomas, M. & Thomas, M.J. (2000). Selected readings in Community Based Rehabilitation: CBR in transition (Series 1). Bangalore: Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal.
6. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professorate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
7. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45 (4), 300-310.
8. Bradbury, H., & Reason, P. (2001). Conclusion: Broadening the bandwidth of validity: Issues and choice-points for improving the quality of action research. In P. Reason & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: Sage.
9. Brown, D. L., & Tandon, R. (1983). Ideology and political economy in inquiry: Action research and participatory research. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 19, 277-294.
10. Brown, E. (1991). Community action for health promotion: A strategy to empower individuals and communities. International Journal of Health Services, 21, 441-456.
11. David, J., Zakus, L., & Lysack, C. L. (1998). Revisiting community participation. Health policy and planning, 13 (1), 1-12.
12. Dickoff, J., James, P., & Wiedenbach, E. (1968). Theory in a practice discipline. Nursing Research, 17, 415-435.
13. Eraut, M. (1994) Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence. Washington. Falmer Press.
14. Fawcett, S. B., Paine-Andrews, A., Francisco, V. T., Scultz, J. A., Richter, K. P., Lewis, R. K., Williams, E. L., Harris, K. J., Berkley, J. Y., Fisher, J. L., & Lopez, C. M. (1995). Using empowerment theory in collaborative partnerships for community mental health and development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, (5), 677-697.
15. Fawcett, S. B., Boothroyd, R., Schultz, J. A., Francisco, V. T., Carson, V., & Bremby, R. (2003). Building Capacity for participatory evaluation within community initiatives. In Suarez-Balcazar, Y. and Harper, G. W. (editors) Empowerment and Participatory Evaluation of Community Interventions. New York: The Haworth Press, Inc.
16. Fetterman, D. M. (1996). Empowerment evaluation: An introduction to theory and practice. In Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. D. M. Fetterman, S. J. Kaftarian & A. Wandersman Ed. Thousand Oaks California: Sage.
17. Forsyth, K. Summerfield-Mann, L., & Kielhofner, G. (2005) A Scholarship of practice: Making occupation-focused, theory-driven, evidence-based practice a reality. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68, 261-268.
18. Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.
19. Hammel, J., Finlayson, M., Kielhofner, G., Helfrich, C., & Peterson, E. (2002). Educating scholars of practice: An approach to preparing tomorrow's researchers. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 15 (1/2), 157-176.
20. Heron, J. (1988). Validity in co-operative inquiry. In Human Inquiry in Action. P. Reason (Ed.). Sage Publications: London.
21. Kielhofner, G. (2001) A scholarship of practice. Paper presented at the American Occupational Therapy Foundation Colloquium and Tea at the American Occupational Therapy Association Conference.
22. Kielhofner, G. (2004) Conceptual Foundations of Occupational Therapy (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: F.A. Davis
23. Kielhofner, G. (2005). Scholarship and Practice: Bridging the Divide. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 231-239.
24. Krogh, K. (1995) Developing a partnership agreement. In J. Pivik (Ed.), Facilitating collaborative research between consumers and researchers. (pp. 69-75). Ottawa, ON: Institute for Rehabilitation Research and Development.
25. Krogh, K. (1998). A conceptual framework of community partnerships: Perspective of people with disabilities on power, beliefs and values. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 12 (2), 123-l34.
26. MacKinnon, C. (1991). From practice to theory, or what is a white women anyway? Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 4 (13), 13-22.
27. Mattingly, C., & Fleming, M. H. (1994). Clinical reasoning: Forms of inquiry in a therapeutic practice. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
28. Maxwell, N. (1992). What kind of inquiry can best help us create a good world? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 17, 205-227.
29. McColl, M. A., Law, M., & Stewart, D. (1993). Theoretical basis of occupational therapy. Thorofare, NJ: Slack, Inc.
30. Minkler, M. (1985). Building supportive ties and sense of community among the inner-city elderly: The Tenderloin senior outreach project. Health Education Quarterly, 12, 303-314.
31. Reason, P. (1988). The co-operative inquiry group. In Human Inquiry in Action. P. Reason (Ed.) Sage Publications: London.
32. Suarez-Balcazar, Y. and Harper, G. W. (Eds.) (2003) Empowerment and Participatory Evaluation of Community Interventions. New York: The Haworth Press, Inc.
33. Suarez-Balcazar, Y. & Harper, G. W. (2003) Community-based approaches to empowerment and participatory evaluation. In Suarez-Balcazar, Y. and Harper, G. W. (editors) Empowerment and Participatory Evaluation of Community Interventions. New York: The Haworth Press, Inc.
34. Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Orellana-Damacela, L., Portillo, N., Sharma, A., & Lanum, M. (2003) Implementing an Outcomes model in the participatory evaluation of community initiatives. In Suarez-Balcazar, Y. and Harper, G. W. (editors) Empowerment and Participatory Evaluation of Community Interventions, New York: The Haworth Press, Inc.
35. Taylor, R., Braveman, B., & Hammel, J. (2004) Developing and Evaluating community services through Participatory Action Research: Two case examples American Journal of Occupational Therapy 58, 35-43.
36. Tewey, B. P. (1997) Building participatory action research partnerships in disability and rehabilitation research. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
37. Townsend, E., Birch, D. E., Langley, J., & Langille, L. (2000). Participatory research in a mental health clubhouse. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 20, 18-44.