An attitudinal study of responses to a range of dermatological conditions using the Implicit Association Test

Journal of Health Psychology

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 821-829

  Grandfield, Tracey A ^a   Thompson, Andrew R ^a   Turpin, Graham ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Dermatitis; Disfigurement; Implicit association test; Skin conditions; Stereotype inhibition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DERMATITIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; RATING SCALE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STEREOTYPY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DERMATITIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREJUDICE; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; REACTION TIME; SKIN DISEASES; STEREOTYPING;

EID: 27644442214     PISSN: 13591053     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1359105305057316     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27-58.
2. Bellezza, F. S., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1986). Words high and low in pleasantness as rated by male and female college students. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 18, 299-303.
3. Bull, R., & Stevens, J. (1981). The effects of facial disfigurement on helping behaviour. Italian Journal of Psychology, 8, 25-31.
4. Changing Faces. (2001). The psychology of facial disfigurement: A guide for health and social care professionals. London: A Changing Faces Publication, GlaxoSmith-Kline.
5. Clarke, A. (1999). Psychosocial aspects of facial disfigurement, problems, management and the role of a lay-led organization. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 4, 127-142.
6. Dasgupta, N., McGhee, D. E., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2000). Automatic preference for White Americans: Eliminating the familiarity explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 316-328.
7. DeHouwer, J. (2001). A structural and process analysis of the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 443-451.
8. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
9. Diepgen, T. L., Yihune, G., Schuler, G., Dieckmann, R., Matvijets, A., Klein, U. et al. (2003). Dermatology online atlas. http://www.dermis.net/doia (accessed July 2003).
10. Dovidio, J. F., Kawakama, K., Johnson, C., Johnson, B., & Howard, A. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 510-540.
11. Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 23, pp. 75-109). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12. Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013-1027.
13. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 1, 4-27.
14. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
15. Heason, S., & Kent, G. (2003). Vitiligo: More than a skin disease. www.shef.ac.uk/socst/Shop/heason.pdf (accessed July 2003).
16. Heiman, G. W. (1998). Understanding research methods and statistics: An integrated introduction for psychology. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
17. Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575-604.
18. Hummert, M. L., Gartska, T. A., O'Brien, L. T., Greenwald, A. G., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). Using the Implicit Association Test to measure age differences in implicit social cognitions. Psychology and Aging, 17(3), 489-495.
19. Kellett, S., & Gilbert, P. (2001). Acne: A biopsychosocial and evolutionary perspective with a focus on shame. British Journal of Health Psychology, 6, 1-24.
20. Kent, G. (2000). Understanding the experiences of people with disfigurements: An integration of four models of social and psychological functioning. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 5, 117-129.
21. Kerr, R. L., Bull, R. H. C., MacCoun, R. J., & Rathborn, H. (1985). Judgements of victim attractiveness, care and disfigurement on the judgements of American and British mock jurors. Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 47-58.
22. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. (1988). Report 1: The prevalence of disability among adults. London: HMSO.
23. Papadopoulos, L., Bor, R., & Legg, C. (1999). Psychological factors in cutaneous disease: An overview of research. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 4, 107-127.
24. Partridge, J. (1996). Facial disfigurement: The full picture. London: Changing Faces.
25. Richeson, J. A., & Ambady, N. (2003). Effects of situational power on automatic racial prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 177-183.
26. Rumsey, N., Bull, R., & Gahagan, D. (1982). The effect of facial disfigurement on the proxemic behaviour of the general public. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 137-150.
27. Samerotte, G. C., & Harris, M. B. (1976). The effects of actual and attempted theft, need, and a previous favor on altruism. Journal of Social Psychology, 99, 193-202.
28. Scharloo, M., Kaptein, A. A., Weinman, J., Bergman, W., Vermeer, B. J., & Roojmans, H. G. M. (2000). Patients' illness perceptions and coping as predictors of functional status in psoriasis: A 1-year follow-up. British Journal of Dermatology, 142, 899-907.
29. Scheinle, A., Stark, R., & Vaitl, D. (2001). Evaluative conditioning: A possible explanation for the acquisition of disgust responses? Learning and Motivation, 32, 65-83.
30. Shaw, W. (1981). Folklore surrounding facial deformity and the origins of facial prejudice. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 34, 237-246.
31. Teachman, B. A., Gapinski, K. D., Brownell, K. D., Rawlins, M., & Jeyaram, S. (2003). Demonstrations of implicit anti-fat bias: The impact of providing causal information and evoking empathy. Health Psychology, 22, 68-78.
32. Thompson, A. R., & Kent, G. (2001). Adjusting to disfigurement: Processes involved in dealing with being visibly different. Clinical Psychology Review, 21(5), 663-682.
33. Thompson, A. R., Kent, G., & Smith, J. A. (2002). Living with vitiligo: Dealing with difference. British Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 213-215.
34. Von Hippel, W., Silver, L. A., & Lynch, M. E. (2000). Stereotyping against your will: The role of inhibitory ability in stereotyping and prejudice among the elderly. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 523-532.
35. Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 207, 101-126.
36. Wittenbrink, B., Gist, P. L., & Hilton, J. L. (1997). Structural properties of stereotypic knowledge and their influences on the construal of social situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 526-543.
37. Wyer, N. A., Sherman, J. W., & Stroessner, S. J. (2000). Theories of motivation and ability in controlling the consequences of stereotype suppression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 13-25.