The reflection-response in enhancing argumentation ability

L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 147-174

  Crasnich, Sergio ^a   Lumbelli, Lucia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Argumentation ability; Contingent instruction; Empathy; Metacognition; Observational learning; Positive feedback; Reciprocal teaching; Reflection response; Self regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 27644438683     PISSN: 15676617     EISSN: 15731731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10674-005-0918-5     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Bernstein, B. (1975). Class and pedagogies: visibles and invisibles. Paris: OCDE.
2. Braaksma, M.A.H., van den Bergh, H., Rijlaarsdam, G. & Couzijn, M. (2001). Effective learning activities in observation tasks when learning to write and read argumentative texts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1, 33-48.
3. Braaksma, M.A.H., Rijlaarsdam, H. & van den Bergh, G. (2002). Observational Learning and the Effects of Model-Observer Similarity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 405-415.
4. Brown, A.L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other, more mysterious mechanisms. In F.E. Weinert & R.H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, Motivation and Understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Coirier, P. (1996). Composing argumentative texts: cognitive and/or textual complexity. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Theories, models and methodology in writing research (pp. 317-337). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
6. Coirier, P., Andriessen, J. & Chanquoy, L. (1999). From planning to translating: the specificity of argumentative writing. In J. Andriessen & P. Coirier (Eds.), Foundations of argumentative text processing (pp. 1-28). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
7. Cornoldi, C., Pra Baldi, A. & Rizzo, M. (1991). Prove avanzate MT di comprensione della lettura [MT Advanced Test of Reading Comprehension]. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.
8. Couzijn, M. (1999). Learning to write by observation of writing and reading processes: effects on learning and transfer. Learning and Instruction, 2, 109-142.
9. Couzijn, M. & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1996). Learning to read and write argumentative text by observation. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Berg & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Effective teaching and learning of writing Current Trends in Research (pp. 253-273). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
10. Crasnich, S. & Lumbelli, L. (2004). Improving argumentative writing by fostering argumentative speech. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Berg & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Effective Learning and Teaching of Writing (pp. 181-196). Dodrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Deutsch, M. (1965). The role of social class in the development of language and cognition. Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1, 78-88.
12. Eemeren, F.H.van & Grootendorst, R. (1999). Developments in argumentation theory. In J. Andriessen & P. Coirier (Eds.), Foundations of argumentative text processing (pp. 43-57). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
13. Golder, C. & Coirier, P. (1994). Argumentative text writing: developmental trends. Discourse Processes, 18, 187-210.
14. Goldstein, K. (1940). Human Nature in the Light of psychopathology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
15. Leseman, P.M. & Sijsling, F.F. (1996). Cooperation and instruction in practical problem solving. Differences in interaction styles of mother-child dyads as related to socio-economic background and cognitive development. Learning and Instruction, 4, 307-323.
16. Lewin, K. (1935). Dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
17. Palincsar, A.R. & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fos-tering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
18. Perelman, C. & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1958). Traité de l'argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique [The new rhetoric. A treatise on argumentation]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
19. Rogers, C.R. (1951). Client-centered therapy. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
20. Schunk, D. & Zimmerman, B.J. (1994). Self-regulation and performance: issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Sluzki, C.E. & Ransom, D.C. (1976). Double bind. New York: Grune and Stratton.
22. Wood, D. & Wood, H. (1996). Contincency in tutoring and learning. Learning and Instruction, 4, 391-397.
23. Wood, D.J., Bruner, J. & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
24. Wood, D., Wood, H. & Middleton, D. (1978). An experimental evaluation of four face-to-face teaching strategies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1, 131-147.
25. Zimmerman, B.J. & Schunk, D.H. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. New York: Springer.