Enhancing environmental awareness: Ecological and economic effects of food consumption

Simulation and Gaming

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 364-382

  Hansmann, Ralf ^a   Scholz, Roland W ^a   Francke, Carl Johan A C ^b   Weymann, Martin ^c  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b Sustainable Asset Management (SAM)   (Switzerland)

^c SWISS REINSURANCE COMPANY   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Consumption pattern; Ecological simulation; Environmental behavior; Environmental education; Feedback learning; Food consumption; Game design; Gaming research; Nutrition; Simulation game

Indexed keywords

EID: 27544508578     PISSN: 10468781     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1046878105279116     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2. Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65, 81-93.
3. Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6),1015-1026.
4. Crott, H. W., Giesel, M., & Hoffmann, C. (1998). The process of inductive inference in groups: The use of positive and negative hypothesis and target testing in sequential rule discovery tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 938-952.
5. Crott, H. W., & Hausmann, R. (2003). Informative intervention to improve normative functioning and output of groups. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 62(3), 177-193.
6. Davis, J. H., Stasser, G., Spitzer, C., & Holt, R. (1976). Changes in group members' decision preferences during discussion: An illustration with mock juries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1177-1187.
7. Deger, K. (1994). Sprechmotorisches Lernen mit Feedback: Grundlagen und therapeutische Anwendung [Motor function speech learning with feedback: Fundamentals and therapeutic application]. Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus- Verlagsgesellschaft.
8. Delgado-Ballester, E., & Munuera-Aléman, J. L. (2001). Brand trust in the context of consumer loyalty. European Journal of Marketing, 35, 1238-1258.
9. Diekmann, A., & Preisendörfer, P. (1992). Persönliches Umweltverhalten. Diskrepanzen zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit [Personal environmental behavior. Discrepancies between aspirations and reality]. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 44(2), 226-251.
10. Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving (Psychological Monographs, 58 [5, Serial No. 270]). Washington: American Psychological Association.
11. Ernst, A. (1997). Ökologisch-soziale Dilemmata: Psychologische Wirkmechanismen des Umweltverhaltens [Ecologic-social dilemmas: Psychological mechanisms underlying environmental behavior]. Weinheim: Beltz Psychologie Verlags Union.
12. Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1981). Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 161-202.
13. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston: Row, Patterson and Company.
14. Flury-Kleubler, R, & Gutscher, H. (2001). Psychological principles of inducing behaviour change. In R. Kaufmann-Hayoz & H. Gutscher (Eds.), Changing things-moving people (pp. 109-129). Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser.
15. Funck, D. (1997).Ökologische Eigenmarken im Handel [Ecological brands in trade]. In M. Bruhn (Ed.), Handelsmarken. Entwicklungstendenzen und Zukunftsperspektiven der Handelsmarkenpolitik (2nd ed., pp. 199-214). Stuttgart: Schdffer-Poeschl Verlag.
16. Godwin, W. E, & Restle, E (1974). The road to agreement: Subgroup pressures in small group consensus processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 500-509.
17. Goosen, K. R., Jensen, R., & Wells, R. (2001). Purpose and learning benefits of simulations: A design and development perspective. Simulation & Gaming: An International Journal, 32(l), 21-39.
18. Grechus, M. (1999). The comparison of individualized computer game reinforcement versus peer-interactive board game reinforcement on nutrition label knowledge retention of fifth graders. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 59(7-A), 2323.
19. Hassenstein, B. (2001). Verhaltensbiologie des Kindes (5. Aufl.) [Behavioral biology of children (5th ed.)]. Heidelberg: Spektrum-Verlag.
20. Jungbluth, N. (2000). Environmental consequences of food consumption: A modular life cycle assessment to evaluate product characteristics. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 5(3), 143-144.
21. Jungbluth, N., Tietje, O., & Scholz, R. W. (2000). Food purchases: Impacts from the consumers'point of view investigated with a modular LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 5(3),134-142.
22. Kallgren, C. A., Reno, R. R., & Cialdini, R. B. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 1002-1012.
23. Kaufmann-Hayoz, R., & Di Giulio, A. (Eds.). (1996). Umweltproblem Mensch: Humanwissenschaftliche Zugänge zu umweltverantwortlichem Handeln [Environmental problem mankind: Social scientific perspectives on responsible environmental action]. Bern: Paul Haupt.
24. Kerr, N. L. (1981). Social transition schemes: Charting the group's road to agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 684-702.
25. Kerr, N. L. (1992). Group decision making at a multialternative task: Extremity, interfaction distance, pluralities, and issue importance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 64-95.
26. Kerr, N. L., & MacCoun, R. J. (1985). The effect of jury size and polling method on the process and product of jury deliberation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 349-363.
27. Kerres, M., & Jechle, T. (2000). Betreuung des Lernens in telemedialen Lerumgebungen [Accompanying the learning in electronic media learning environments]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 28(3), 257-277.
28. Köllner, T. (2001). Land use in product life cycles and its consequences for ecosystem quality. Doctoral thesis no. 2519, Institute for Economy and the Environment, University St. Gallen.
29. Krishnamurthi, L., & Raj, S. P. (1991). An empirical analysis of the relationship between brand loyalty and consumer price elasticity. Marketing Science, 10(2), 172-183.
30. Kyburz-Graber, R., & Schlüter, K. (2001). Umweltbildung im 20. Jahrhundert: Anfänge, Gegeniwartsprobleme, Perspektiven [Environmental education in the 20th century: Start, current problems, perspectives]. Münster: Waxmann.
31. Marschall, F. (1992). Informationsfrequenz und motorisches Lernen: Zur Frage von H⊣aufigkeit und V Verteilung ergänzender Feedback-Information bei sportmotorischen Optimierungsprozessen [Frequency of information and motor functional learning: Concerning the question of frequency and dispersion of supplemental feedback-information of motor optimization processes in sports]. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
32. Meffert, H., & Burmann, C. (1996). Identitätsorientierte Markenführung-Konsequenzen für die Handelsmarke [Identity oriented brand management-Consequences for trademarks]. In M. Bruhn (Ed.), Handelsmarken. Entwicklungstendenzen und Zukunftsperspektiven der Handelsmarkenpolitik (2nd ed., pp. 49-69). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschl Verlag.
33. Moscovici, S., & Faucheux, C. (1972). Social influence, conformity bias and the study of active minorities. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 140-202). New York: Academic Press.
34. Mosler, H. J., Ammann, F., & Gutscher, H. (1998). Simulation des Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM): Ein Beispiel zur Entwicklung und Analyse von Umweltinterventionen [Simulation of the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM): An example for the development and analysis of environmental interventions]. ZeitschriftAr Sozialpsychologie, 29, 20-37.
35. Mugny, G. (1982). The power of minorities. London: Academic Press.
36. Mugny, G., & Papastamou, S. (1977). Pour une nouvelle approche de l'influence minoritaire: Les determinants psychosociaux des strategies d'influence minoritaires [In favor of a new approach toward minority influence: The psychosocial determinants of the strategies of influence of minorities]. Bulletin de Psychologie, 30,573-579.
37. Peters, V., Vissers, G., & Heijne, G. (1998). The validity of games. Simulation & Gaming: An International Journal, 29(l), 20-30.
38. Preisendörfer, P. (1996). Umweltbewußtsein in Deutschland-Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevökerungsumfrage [Environmental concern in Germany-Results of a representative survey]. Berlin: Bundesministeriurn ffir Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit.
39. Raser, J. C. (1969). Simulations and society: An exploration ofscientfic gaming. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
40. Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional design: What is it and why is it? In Ch. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 3-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. Reimann, P. (1990). Problem solving models of scientific discovery leaming processes. Frankfurt: Verlag Peter Lang.
42. Reimann, P. (1991). Detecting functional relations in a computerized discovery environment. Learning and Instruction, 1, 45-65.
43. Reimann, P. (1999). The role of external representations in distributed problem solving. Learning and Instruction, 9,411-418.
44. Reno, R. R., Cialdini, R. B., & Kallgren, C. A. (1993). The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(l), 104-112.
45. Schahn, J. (1993). Die Kluft zwischen Einstellung und Verhalten beim individuellen Umweltschutz [The gap between individual attitudes and behaviors concerning nature protection]. In J. Schahn & T. Giesinger (Eds.), Psychologie für den Umweltschutz (pp. 29-49). Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.
46. Schenk, H.-O. (1997). Funktionen, Erfolgsbedingungen und Psychostrategie von Handels und Gattungsmarken [Function, conditions for success, and psychological strategies for brands and trademarks]. In M. Bruhn (Ed.), Handelsmarken. Entwicklungstendenzen und Zukunftsperspektiven der Handelsmarkenpolitik (2nd ed., pp. 71-96). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschl Verlag.
47. Schuetz, S. (1979). Effects of a simulation game on children's consumer knowledge. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 48(3), 767-773.
48. Sleet, D. A. (1985). Application of a gaming strategy to improve nutrition education. Simulation & Games: An International Journal, 16(l), 63-70.
49. Torres,M., &Macedo,J. (2000). Lean-ting sustainable development with anew simulationgame. Simulation & Gaming: An International Journal, 31(1), 119-126.
50. Ulrich, M. (1999). COREBIEA. Zurich, Switzerland: Ulrich Creative Simulations (Pfingstweidstr 31a, CH8005 Zurich, Switzerland).
51. Ulrich, M. (2000). Strategies for sustainable development in the need-field nutrition-An innovative approach using the policy exercise COREBIFA-SIMULATION GAME ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND NUTRITION. In R. W. Scholz, R. Häberli, A. Bill, & M. Welti (Eds.), Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem-solving among science, technology and society. Workbook II Mutual learning sessions (pp. 72-77). Zürich, Switzerland: Haffmans Sachbuch Verlag.
52. Ulrich, M., & Borner, S. (2000). A method to communicate scientific results to people outside science-The example of COREBIFA-SIMULATION GAME ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND NUTRITION. In R. Häberli, R. W. Scholz, A. Bill, & M. Welti (Eds.), Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem-solving among science, technology and society. Workbook I.- Dialogue sessions and idea market (pp. 560-564). Zfirich, Switzerland: Haffmans Sachbuch Verlag.
53. Williams, R. H. (1980). Attitude change and simulation games: The ability of a simulation game to change attitudes when structured in accordance with either the cognitive dissonance or incentive models of attitude change. Simulation & Games: An International Journal, 11(2), 177-196.