Learning Sustainable Development with a New Simulation Game

Simulation & Gaming

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 119-126

  Torres, Maruja ^a   Macedo, Joseli ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

best practices; education training; environmental design; frame game; simulation gaming; sustainable development; urban planning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993746845     PISSN: 10468781     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104687810003100112     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Baker, A. C., & Jensen, P.J. (1997). In conversation: Transforming experience into learning. Simulation & Gaming: An International Journal, 28, 6-12.
2. Duke, R. (1994). Gaming: An emergent discipline. Simulation & Gaming, Silver Anniversary Issue, 25 (Pt. 4), 426-439.
3. Hasell, M.J. (1983). Gaming simulation: A communication tool for architects and designers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
4. Jones, K. (1998). Simulation: Reading for action. Simulation & Gaming: An International Journal, 29, 326-330.
5. Petranek, C. (1992). Three levels of learning in simulations: Participating, debriefing, and journal writing. Simulation & Gaming: An International Journal, 23, 174-185.
6. Petranek, C. (1994). Amaturation in experiential learning: Principles of simulation and gaming. Simulation& Gaming: An International Journal, 25, 513-522.
7. St-Germain, M., & Laveualt, D. (1997). Factors of success of simulations and games: A systemic approach to the evaluation of an organization’s impact on the user. Simulation & Gaming: An International Journal, 28, 317-336.
8. Thatcher, D. C. (1990). Promoting learning through games and simulations. Simulation& Gaming: An Internatinal Journal, 21, 262-273.
9. Thiagarajan, S. (1998, October). Facilitation: How to conduct and debrief experiential activities. Paper presented at the NASAGA Pre-Conference Workshop, Atlanta, GA.
10. Williams, R. H. (1980). Attitude change and simulation games: The ability of a simulation game to change attitudes when structured in accordance with either the cognitive dissonance or incentive models of attitude change. Simulation & Games, 11(2), 177-196.