Elicitation support requirements of multi-expertise teams

Journal of Interactive Learning Research

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 133-154

  Bitter Rijpkema, Marlies ^a   Martens, Rob ^b   Jochems, Wim ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27544468429     PISSN: 1093023X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Allee, V. (1997). The knowledge evolution. Expanding organizational intelligence. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
2. Alpay, L., Giboin, A., & Dieng, R. (1998). Accidentology: An example of problem solving by multiple agents with multiple representations. In M. W. Van Someren, P. Reimann, H. P. A. Boshuizen, & T. De Jong (Eds.), Learning with multiple representations (pp. 152-174). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
3. Baker, M., & Lund, K. (1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13, 175-193.
4. Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Kirschner, P. A. (2003). Common ground, complex problems and decision support. Paper presented at the 30th Onderwijs Research Dagen (ORD), Kerkrade, The Netherlands.
5. Bell, P. (1997). Using argument representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groups. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, Toronto, Canada.
6. Boisot, M. (1998). Knowledge assets: Securing competitive advantage in the information economy, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7. Bromme, R., & Nückles, M. (1998). Perspective-taking between medical doctors and nurses: A study on multiple representations of different experts with common tasks. In M.W. van Someren, P. Reimann, H.P.A. Boshuizen, & T. de Jong (Eds.), Learning with multiple representations (pp. 175-196). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
8. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1998). Organizing knowledge. California Management Review, 40(3), 90-111.
9. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Cambridge.MA: Harvard Business School Press.
10. Bruggen, J. M. van, Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Kirschner, P. A. (2003). A cognitive framework for cooperative problem solving with argument visualization. In P.A. Kirschner, S. Buckingham Shum, & C. S. Carr (Eds.). Visualizing argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense making (pp. 25-47). London, UK: Springer.
11. Buckingham Shum, S., & Hammond, N. (1994). Rapid knowledge construction: A case study in corporate contingency planning using collaborative hypermedia. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40(4), 603-652.
12. Carr, C. S. (2002) Using computer supported argument visualization to teach legal argumentation. In P. A. Kirschner, S. J. Buckingham Shum, & C..S.Carr (Eds.) Visualizing argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making. London: Springer-Verlag.
13. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Choo, F. (1989). Expert-novice differences in judgment/decisionmaking research. Journal of accounting Literature, 8, 106-136.
15. Conklin, J., Selvin, A., Buckingham Shum, S., & Sierhuis, M. (2001). Facilitated hypertext for collective sensemaking: 15 years on from gIBIS. Retrieved November 13, 2003, from http://cognexus.org/ Conklin-HT01.pdf
16. Davenport, T., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge. How organizations manage what they know. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
17. Drucker, P. (1992). The new society of organisations. Harvard Business Review, 70, 95-104.
18. Feltovich, P., Spiro, R., & Coulson, R. (1997). Issues of expert flexibility in contexts characterized by complexity and change. In P. J. Feltovich, K. M. Ford, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Expertise in context. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI/MIT Press.
19. Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2001, March). Facilitating the construction of shared knowledge with graphical representation tools in face-to-face and computer-mediated scenarios. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), Proceedings of Euro-CSCL 2001, (pp. 230-236), Maastricht, Netherlands.
20. Fischer, G., Sugimoto, M., (1999). A group has no head - conceptual frameworks and systems for supporting social interaction. Information Processing Society of Japan (IPSJ) Magazine, 40(6), 575-582.
21. Jeong, H., & Chi, M.T.H. (2000). Does collaborative learning lead to the construction of common knowledge? Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Jonassen, D. H., & Carr, Ch. S. (1999). Mindtools: Affording multiple knowledge representations for learning. In S. P. Lajoie (Ed.), Computers as cognitive tools II: No more walls: Theory change, paradigm shifts and their influence on the use of computers for instructional purposes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn, & Bacon.
24. Kenis, D.G.A. (1995). Improving group decisions. Designing and testing techniques for group decision support systems applying Delphi. Doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht: Lummen.
25. Kessels, J.W.M. (1996). Knowledge productivity and the corporate curriculum. In J.F. Schreinemakers (Ed.) Knowledge management Organization. Competence and methodology. Advances in knowledge management, Wurzburg: Ergon Verlag, Vol. 1, 168-174.
26. Kirschner, P.A., Buckingham Shum, S.J.,& Carr, C.S. (Eds.) (2003). Visualizing argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making (pp. 25-47). London: Springer
27. Kogut, B., & Zander, V. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397.
28. Krogh, G. von, Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. (2000). Enabling knowledge creation: How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation, New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Leinonen, T., Virtanen, O., Hakkarainen, K., & Kligyte, G. (2002). Collaborative discovering of key ideas in knowledge building. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. Proceedings of the Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2002 Conference (pp. 529-530). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Leonard, D., & Sensiper, S. (1998). The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California Management Review, 40, 112-132.
31. Linstone, H.A., & Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method. Techniques and applications. London:Addison and Wesley. Retrieved February 29, 2004, from http://www.is.njit.edu/pubs/delphbook/index.html
32. Mulder, I., Swaak, J, & Kessels, J. (2002). Assessing group learning and shared understanding in technology-mediated interaction. Journal of Education Technology & Society, 5(1), 35-47. Special issue.
33. Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge creating company. Harvard Business Review 69, 96-104.
34. Ostwald, J. (1995). Supporting collaborative design with representations for mutual understanding. In I. Katz, R. Mack, & L. Marks (Eds.), Proceedings of ACM CHI'95 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Volume 2, 69-70. New York: ACM Press.
35. Polanyi, M. (1967). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Plötzner, R., Dillenbourg, P., Preier, M., & Traum, D. (1999). Learning by explaining to oneself and to others. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 103-121). Oxford: Elsevier
37. Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (1998). Distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn in a Learning by Design™ environment. Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences '98, (pp. 35-41).
38. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 249-268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39. Selvin, A.M. (1999). Supporting collaborative analysis and design with hypertext functionality. Journal of Digital information, 1, 1-14.
40. Selvin, A. M., & Buckingham Shum, S.J. (2000, July). Rapid knowledge construction: A case study in corporate contingency planning using collaborative hypermedia. Proceedings of KMaC 2000: Knowledge Management Beyond the Hype. Aston Business School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
41. Sumner, T., Domingue, J., & Zdrahal, Z. (1998). Enriching representations of work to support organizational learning (Tech Rep No KMI-TR-60). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University, Knowledge Media Institute.
42. Suthers, D. D. (1999). Effects of alternate representations of evidential relations on collaborative learning discourse. In C. M. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 1999, (pp. 611-620). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
43. Toulmin, S. E., (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44. Toulmin, S. E., Rieke, R. D., & Janik, A. (1984). An introduction to reasoning (2nd ed.). New York, London: Macmillan & Collier Macmillan.
45. Webler, T., Levine, D., Rakel, H., & Renn, O. (1991). A novel approach at reducing uncertainty: The Group Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 39, 253-263.
46. Zack, M. H. (1998). What knowledge problems can information technology help to solve? Proceedings of the 1998 Conference of the Association for Information Systems, (pp. 644-646). Baltimore, MD.