Patterns of guidance in inquiry learning

Journal of Interactive Learning Research

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 179-194

  Veermans, Marjaana ^a   Lallimo, Jiri ^b   Hakkarainen, Kai ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27544443369     PISSN: 1093023X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ainsworth, S., Wood, D., & O'Malley, C. (1998). There is more than one way to solve a problem: Evaluating a learning environment that supports the development of children's multiplication skills. Learning and Instruction, 8, 141-157.
2. Bielaczyc, K. (2001). Designing social infrastructure: The challenge of building computer -supported learning communities. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning. Proceedings of the First European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 106-114). Maastricht, The Netherlands: University of Maastricht.
3. Brown, A. L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., & Campione, J. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 188-228). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems, In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289-325). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: Prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 819-837.
6. Fretz, E. B., Wu, H.-K., Zhang, B. H., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2002). An investigation of software scaffolds supporting modeling practices. Research in Science Education, 32, 567-589.
7. Goldman, S. R., Mayfield-Stewart, C., Bateman, H. V., Pellegrino, J. W., & Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1998). Environments that support meaningful learning. In L. Hoffman, A. Krapp, & K.A. Renninger (Eds.), Interest and learning: Proceedings of the Seeon Conference on Interest and Gender (pp. 181-196). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
8. Goldman, S. R., Zech, L. K., Biswas, G., Noser, T., & Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1999). Computer technology and complex problem solving: Issues in the study of complex cognitive activity. Instructional Science, 27, 235-268.
9. Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (2000). Effective discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 437-469.
10. Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Emergence of progressive-inquiry culture in computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning Environments Research, 6, 199-220.
11. Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., & Järvelä, S. (2002). Epistemology of inquiry and computer-supported collaborative learning. In T. Koschmann, N. Miyake, & R. Hall (Eds.), CSCL2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 129-156). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Hakkarainen, K., & Sintonen, M. (2002). Interrogative model of inquiry and computer-supported collaborative learning. Science & Education, 11, 25-43.
13. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1992). Desituating cognition through the construction of conceptual knowledge. In P. Light & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Context and cognition. Ways of knowing and learning (pp. 115-133). New York: Harvester.
14. Järvelä S., Hakkarainen, K., Lehtinen, E., & Lipponen, L. (2001). Creating computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) culture in Finnish schools: Research perspectives on sociocognitive effects. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 11 (4/5/6), 365-374.
15. Kolodner, J. (2001). A note from the editor. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 1-4.
16. Kolodner, J., & Crey, J. (2002). Understanding the affordances of ritualized activity structures for project-based classrooms. In P. Bell, R. Stevens, & T. Satwicz (Eds.), Keeping learning complex. Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) (pp. 221-228). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Koschmann, T. (Ed.). (1996). CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., & Fredricks, J. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 313-350.
19. Kuhn, D., Black, J., Keselman, A., & Kaplan, D. (2000). The development of cognitive skills to support inquiry learning. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 495-523.
20. Lehtinen, E., Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., & Muukkonen, H. (1999). Computer supported collaborative learning: A review. The J.H.G.I. Giesbers Reports on Education. Department of Educational Sciences. University on Nijmegen.
21. Lepper, M. R., Drake, M. F., & O'Donnell-Johnson, T. (1997). Scaffolding techniques of expert human tutors. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Ed.), Scaffolding student learning (pp. 109-144). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
22. Lipponen, L. (2000). Towards knowledge building discourse: From facts to explanations in primary students' computer mediated discourse. Learning Environments Research, 3, 179-199.
23. Muukkonen, H., Lakkala, M., & Hakkarainen, K. (2001). Characteristics of university students' inquiry in individual and computer-supported collaborative study process. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning. Proceedings of the First European Conference on CSCL (pp. 389-396). University of Maastricht.
24. Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2003). The meaning of mediation in the epistemology of nnovative knowledge communities. A paper presented at the 10th biennial Conference of European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, August 26-30, 2003, Padova, Italy.
25. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67-98). Chicago: Open Court.
26. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265-283.
27. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into world 3. In K. McGilly (Eds.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory & classroom practice (pp. 201-228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Veermans, M., & Järvelä, S. (2004). Generalized achievement goals and situational coping in inquiry learning. Instructional Science, 32, 269-291.
29. Vermunt, J. D., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 3, 257-280.
30. White, B. (1993). Thinker Tools: Causal models, conceptual change, and science education. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 1-100.
31. Winn, W. (2002). Current trends in educational technology research: The study of learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 331-351.
32. Wood, H., & Wood, D. (1999). Help seeking, learning and contingent tutoring. Computers & Education, 33, 153-169.