Distraction osteogenesis versus autogenous onlay grafting. Part I: Outcome of implant integration

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 695-702

  Perry, Michael ^a   Hodges, Nathan ^b   Hallmon, D William ^b   Rees, Terry ^b   Opperman, Lynne A ^b  

^a Texas A and M University System Health Science Center ^*

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone augmentation; Distraction osteogenesis; Implants; Onlay grafts

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; DOG; EVALUATION; MALE; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; ORAL SURGERY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION; ANIMALS; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DOGS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MODELS, ANIMAL; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION;

EID: 27544437471     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Verhoeven JW, Cune MS, Terlou M, Zoon MA, de Putter C. The combined use of endosteal implants and iliac crest onlay grafts in the severely atrophic mandible: A longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;26:351-357.
2. Verhoeven JW, Ruijter J, Cune MS, Terlou M, Zoon M. Onlay grafts in combination with endosseous implants in severe mandibular atrophy: One year results of a prospective, quantitative radiological study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:583-594.
3. Baker R. Long-term results of alveolar ridge augmentation. J Oral Surg 1979;37:486-489.
4. Santoro F, Maiorana C, Rabagliati M. Long-term results with autogenous onlay grafts in maxillary and mandibular atrophy. J Long-Term Eff Med Implants 1999;9:215-222.
5. Parma-Benfenati S, Tinti C, Albrektsson T, Johansson C. Histologic evaluation of guided vertical ridge augmentation around implants in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999;19:424-437.
6. Simion M, Jovanovic SA, Trisi P, Scarano A, Piattelli A. Vertical ridge augmentation around dental implants using a membrane technique and autogenous bone or allografts in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998;18:8-23.
7. Schliephake H, Kracht D. Vertical ridge augmentation using polylactic membranes in conjunction with immediate implants in periodontally compromised extraction sites: An experimental study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:325-334.
8. Tinti C, Parma-Benfenati S, Polizzi G. Vertical ridge augmentation: What is the limit? Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996;16:220-229.
9. Schliephake H, Dard M, Planck H, Hierlemann H, Stern U. Alveolar ridge repair using resorbable membranes and autogenous bone particles with simultaneous placement of implants: An experimental pilot study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:364-373.
10. Simion M, Jovanovic SA, Tinti C, Benfenati SP. Long-term evaluation of osseointegrated implants inserted at the time or after vertical ridge augmentation. A retrospective study on 123 implants with 1-5 year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:35-45.
11. Cornelini R, Cangini F, Covani U, Andreana S. Simultaneous implant placement and vertical ridge augmentation with a titanium-reinforced membrane: A case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:883-888.
12. Simion M, Trisi P, Piattelli A. Vertical ridge augmentation using a membrane technique associated with osseointegrated implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1994;14:496-511.
13. Chin M. The role of distraction osteogenesis in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;56:805-806.
14. Block M. Mandibular alveolar ridge augmentation in the dog using distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:309-314.
15. Block M. Bone response to functioning implants in dog mandibular alveolar ridges augmented with distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:342-351.
16. Ham A. Bone. In: Ham A (ed). Histology, ed 5. Hagerstown, MD: JB Lippincott, 1965:384-457.
17. Burchardt H. The biology of bone graft repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983;174:28-42.
18. DeLacure MD. Physiology of bone healing and bone graft. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1994;27:859-864.
19. Sykaras N, Triplett RG, Nunn ME, Iacopino AM, Opperman LA. Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 on bone regeneration and osseointegration of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:339-349.
20. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:38-45.
21. Steflik DE, Lake FT, Sisk AL, et al. A comparative investigation in dogs: 2-year morphometric results of the dental implant-bone interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:15-25.
22. Keller JC, Young FA, Natiella JR. Quantitative bone remodelling resulting from the use of porous dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;21:305-319.
23. Johansson CB, Morberg P. Cutting directions of bone with biomaterials in situ does influence the outcome of histomorphometrical quantifications. Biomaterials 1995;16:1037-1039.
24. Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP, Cochran DL, Nolte LP. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:611-619.
25. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:1-11.
26. Hipp JA, Brunski JB. Investigation of "osseointegration" by histomorphometric analyses of fixture-bone interface. J Dent Res 1987;66(special issue):186.
27. Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Trisi P, Porter SS, Weinstein RL. A human histologic analysis of Osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surfaces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999;19:117-129.
28. Ericsson I, Johansson CB, Bystedt H, Norton MR. A histomorphometric evaluation of bone-to-implant contact on machine-prepared and roughened titanium dental implants. A pilot study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:202-206.