A Comparative Investigation in Dogs: 2-Year Morphometric Results of the Dental Implant-Bone Interface

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 15-25

  Steflik, David E ^a   Lake, Francis T ^a   Sisk, Allen L ^a   Parr, Gregory R ^a   Hanes, Philip J ^a   Davis, Harry C ^a   Adams, Benjamin O ^a   Yavari, Javid ^a  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Alumina oxide ceramic; Bone; Bone contact length; Dental implants; Fibrous connective tissue; Histology; In vivo; Mandible; Morphometry; Scanning electron microscopy; Titanium

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CERAMICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTURE; DOG; HAVERSIAN CANAL; HISTOLOGY; IMAGE PROCESSING; MANDIBLE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH ROOT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BLADE IMPLANTATION; CERAMICS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DOGS; HAVERSIAN SYSTEM; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MANDIBLE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; TOOTH ROOT;

EID: 0029683420     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Schnitman PA, Shulman LB (eds). Dental Implants: Benefits and Risks [Report NIH 81-1531]. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health. Department of Health and Human Services, 1980.
2. Rizzo AA (ed). Conference Proceedings Dental Implants: National Institutes of Health Consensus Developmental Conference. J Dent Educ 1988;52:678-827.
3. Steflik DE, Sisk AL, Parr GR, Hanes PJ, Lake FT, Song MJ, et al. High voltage electron microscopy and conventional transmission electron microscopy of the interface zone between bone and endosteal dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26:529-545.
4. Steflik DE, Hanes PJ, Sisk AL, Parr GR, Song MJ, Lake FT, McKinney RV. Transmission electron microscopic and high voltage electron microscopic observations of the bone and osteocyte activity adjacent to unloaded dental implants placed in dogs. J Periodontol 1992;63:443-452.
5. Steflik DE, Sisk AL, Parr GR, Hanes PJ, Lake FT, Brewer P, et al. Correlative transmission electron microscopic and scanning electron microscopic observations of the tissues supporting endosteal blade implants. J Oral Implantol 1992;18:110-120.
6. Steflik DE, Parr GR, Sisk AL, Hanes PJ, Lake FT. Electron microscopy of the bone response to titanium cylindrical screw-type endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:497-507.
7. Steflik DK, Sisk AL, Parr GR, Gardner LK, Hanes PJ, Lake FT, et al. Osteogenesis at the dental implant interface: High voltage electron microscopic and conventional transmission electron microscopic observations. J Biomed Mater Res 1993;27:791-800.
8. Steflik DE, Parr GR, Sisk AL, Hanes PJ, Lake FT, Gardner LK, Berkery DJ. Morphology of the bone supporting endosteal dental implants: Transmission electron microscopic and high voltage electron microscopic observations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993;76:467-475.
9. Hansson HA, Albrektsson T, Brånemark P-I. Structural aspects of the interface between tissue and titanium implants. J Prosthet Dent 1983:50:109-113.
10. Brånemark P-I. Introduction to osseointegration. In: Brånemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds). Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985;11-76.
11. Sisk AL, Steflik DE, Parr GR, Hanes PJ. A light and electron microscopic comparison of osseointegration of six implant types. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;50:709-716.
12. Lum LB, Beirne OR. Viability of the retained bone core in the Core-Vent dental implant. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;44:341-345.
13. Lum LB, Beirne OR, Dillinges M, Curtis TA. Osseointegration of two types of implants in nonhuman primates. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:700-705.
14. Listgarten MA, Buser D, Steinemann SG, Donath K, Lang NP, Leber HP. Light and transmission electron microscopy of the intact interfaces between non-submerged titanium-coated resin implants and bone or gingiva. J Dent Res 1992;71:364-371.
15. Schroeder A, van der Zypen E, Stich H, Sutter F. The reaction of bone, connective tissue and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium-sprayed surfaces. J Maxillofac Surg 1981;9:15-25.
16. Pilliar RM, Deporter DA, Watson PA, Pharoah M, Chapman M, Valiquette N, et al. The effect of partial coating with hydroxylapatite on bone remodeling in relation to porous coated titanium alloy dental implants in the dog. J Dent Res 1991;70:1338-1345.
17. Keller JC, Young FA, Natiella JR. Quantitative bone remodeling resulting from the use of porous dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;21:305-319.
18. Cook SD, Kay JF, Thomas KA, Jarcho M. Interface mechanics and histology of titanium and hydroxylapatite-coated titanium for dental implant applications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:15-22.
19. De Lange GL, Donath K. Interface between bone tissue and implants of solid hydroxyapatite or hydroxylapatite coated titanium implants. Biomaterials 1989;10:121-125.
20. Akagawa Y, Hashimoto M, Kando N, Yamasaki A, Tsuru H. Initial bone-implant interfaces of submergible and supramergible single crystal sapphire implants. J Prosthet Dent 1985;55:96-99.
21. Hipp JA, Brunski JB. Investigation of 'Osseointegration' by histomorphometric analyses of fixture-bone interface [abstract 637]. J Dent Res 1987;66 (special issue):186.
22. Block MS, Finger IM, Fontenot MG, Kent JN. Loaded hydroxylapatite coated and grit-blasted titanium implants in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:219-225.
23. Gottlander M, Albrektsson T. Histomorphometric studies of hydroxylapatite-coated and uncoated CP titanium threaded implants in bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:399-404.
24. Gottlander M, Albrektsson T, Carlsson LV. A histomorphometric study of unthreaded hydroxylapatite-coated and titanium-coated implants in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:485-490.
25. Parr GR, Steflik DE, Sisk AL. Histomorphometric and histologic observations of bone healing around immediate implants in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:534-540.
26. Parr GR, Gardner LK, Steflik DE, Sisk AL. Comparative implant research in dogs: Prosthodontic principles. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:509-514.
27. Steflik DE, White SL, Parr GR, Sisk AL, Schoen SP, Lake FT, Hanes PJ. Clinical evaluation data from a comparative dental implant investigation in dogs. J Oral Implantol 1993;19:1-10.
28. Steflik DE, McKinney RV, Mobley GL, Koth DL. Simultaneous histological preparation of bone, soft tissue and implanted biomaterials for light microscopic observations. Stain Technol 1982;57:91-98.
29. Cason L, McKinney RV, Larke V, Steflik DE. Histomorphometric analysis of endosteal implant bone interfaces [abstract 1905]. J Dent Res 1990;69 (especial issue):347.
30. White SL, Steflik DE, Parr GR, Sisk AL, Lake FT, Hanes PJ. Composite morphology of the tissue interfaces to integrated dental implants [abstract 1027]. J Dent Res 1994;73:230.
31. Steflik DE, McKinney RV, Parr GR, Sisk AL, Koth DL. What we know about the interface between implants and soft tissues. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 1991;3:775-793.
32. Roberts WE, Smith RK, Zilberman Y, Mozsary PG, Smith RS. Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. Am J Orthop 1984;86:95-111.
33. Roberts WE. Bone-implant interface. J Dent Educ 1988;52:804-809.