What really makes students like a web site? What are the implications for designing web-based language learning sites?

ReCALL

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 85-102

  Hughes, Jane ^a   Mcavinia, Claire ^a   King, Terry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27344435694     PISSN: 09583440     EISSN: 14740109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0958344004000710     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. ATLAS Project. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/epd/atlas/
2. Brown, I. (2003) The case of the forgotten pedagogy: the value of visual literacy for learning with new technologies. Proceedings of CAL (Computers and Learning) 2003, Queen's University Belfast, 8-10 April 2003.
3. Goto, K. and Cotler, E. (2002) Web ReDesign: Workflow that Works. Indianapolis: New Riders.
4. Hémard, D. and Cushion, S. (2001) Evaluation of a web-based language learning environment: the importance of a user-centred design approach for CALL. ReCALL 13(1): 15-31.
5. Hinostroza, J. E. and Mellar, H. (2001) Pedagogy embedded in software design: report of a case study. Computers and Education 37: 27-40.
6. Honeywill, P. (1999) Visual Language for the World Wide Web. Exeter: Intellect.
7. Hughes, J. (2003) A Shared Workspace for Text-based Teaching and Learning: Design Requirements and Pedagogical Benefits. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of London. The Joint Council for General Qualifications (JCGQ) http://www.jcgq.og.uk/
8. Kelly, M. and Jones, D. (2003) A new landscape for languages. London: Nuffield Languages Programme. http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/languages/news/nw0000000548.asp. Last accessed 5th April 2004.
9. Kensing, F. and Munk-Madsen, A. (1993) PD: Structure in the Toolbox. Communications of the ACM 36(4): 78-85.
10. Special issue on participatory design.
11. Kress, G. (1998) Visual and verbal modes of representation in electronically mediated communication: the potentials of new forms of text. In: Synder, I., Page to Screen: Taking Literacy into the Electronic Era. London: Routledge, 53-79.
12. Lemay, L. (2000) Teach Yourself Web Publishing with HTML 4.0 in 21 Days. Indianapolis: Sams
13. Lunt, P. and Livingstone, S. (1996) Rethinking the focus group in media and communications research. Journal of Communication 46(2): 79-98.
14. Morgan, D. L. (1998) The Focus Group Guidebook. Focus Group Kit Volume 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Muller, M. J., Wildman, D. M. and White, E. A. (1993) Taxonomy of PD practices: a brief practitioner's guide. Special issue on participatory design. Communications of the ACM, 36(4): 64-66.
16. Nielsen, J. (2000) Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity. Indianapolis: New Riders.
17. Ritchie, D. C. and Hoffman, R. (1996) Using instructional design principles to amplify learning on the world wide web. Technology and Teacher Education Annual, Proceedings of SITE96: AACE.
18. Rowntree, D. (1994) Preparing Materials for Open, Distance and Flexible Learning. London: Kogan Page.
19. Sims, E., O'Leary, R., Cook, J. and Butland, G. (2002) Visual lLiteracy: What is it and do we need it to use learning technologies effectively? Proceedings of ASCILITE 2002, 885-888.
20. Wall, P. and Mosher, A. (1994) Representations of work: bringing designers and users together. Proceedings of PD'94, the Participatory Design Conference, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. CPSR (Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility), Palo Alto, CA, 87-98.
21. Weinman, L. (2003) Designing Web Graphics 4. Indianapolis: New Riders.