Versatility of IPS empress® restorations. Part II: Veneers, inlays, and onlays

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 170-176

  Fradeani, Mauro ^a   Barducci, Giancarlo ^b  

^a Pesaro and Milano   (Italy)

^b NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; LEUCITE;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; CEMENTATION; CROWNS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL VENEERS; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; HUMANS; INLAYS; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; TOOTH PREPARATION, PROSTHODONTIC;

EID: 0030309237     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: 17088240     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1996.tb00421.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Wohlwend A, Scharer P. The Empress technique: a new technique for the fabrication of full ceramic crowns, inlays, and veneers. (In German). Quintessenz Zahntech 1990; 16:966–978. (English reprints, 1991).
2. Dong JK, Luthy H, Wohlwend A, Scharer P. Heat pressed ceramics: technology and strength, Int J Prosthodont 1992; 5: 9–16.
3. Chiche GJ, Pinault A. Esthetics of anterior fixed prosthodontics. Chicago : Quintessence, 1994.
4. Fradeani M. Anterior maxillary aesthetics utilizing all-ceramic restorations. Pract Periodont Aesthetic Dent 1995; 7:53–64.
5. Calamia JR. Etched porcelain veneers: the current state of art. Quintessence lnt 1985; 1:5–10.
6. Friedman MJ. Augmenting restorative dentistry with porcelain veneers. J Am Dent Assoc 1991; 122:29–34.
7. Sheets CG, Taniguchi T. Advantages and limitations in the use of porcelain veneer restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64:406–411.
8. Simonsen RJ, Calamia JR. Tensile bond strength of etched porcelain. J Dent Res 1983; 62:297. (Abstr).
9. Roulet JF, Losche GM, Noack MJ. Inlays and onlays. Curr Opin Cosmetic Dent 1993;3:41–54.
10. Sorensen JA, Strutz JM, Avera SP, Materdomini D. Marginal fidelity and microleakage of porcelain veneers made by two techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67:16–22.
11. Garber DA, Goldstein RE, Feinman RA. Porcelain laminate veneers. Chicago : Quintessence, 1988.
12. Garber DA, Goldstein RE. Porcelain and composite inlay and onlay: esthetic posterior restorations. Chicago : Quintessence, 1994.
13. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M, Heinzemann JL. Wear of ceramic inlays, their enamel antagonists, and luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69:425–430.
14. Heinzmann JL, Krejci I, Lutz F. Wear and marginal adaptation of glass-ceramic inlays, amalgams, and enamel. J Dent Res 1992 (Abstr).
15. Horn HR. Porcelain laminate veneers bonded to etched enamel. Dent Clin North Am 1983; 27:671–684.
16. Ferrari M, Patroni S, Balleri P. Measurement of enamel thickness in relation to reduction for etched laminate veneers. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992; 12:407–413.
17. Garber D. Porcelain laminate veneers: ten years later. Part I: tooth preparation. J Esthet Dent 1993; 5: 57–62.
18. Touati B. Bonded ceramic restorations: achieving predictability. Pract Periodont Aesthetic Dent 1995; 4:17–28.
19. Celenza FV. Occlusal morphology. Chicago : Quintessence, 1980.
20. Dietschi D, Magne P, Holz J. Bonded to tooth ceramic restorations: in vitro evaluation of the efficiency and failure mode of two modern adhesives. Schweir Monatsschr Zahnmed 1994; 105: 299–305.
21. Krejci I, Krejci D, Lutz F. Clinical evaluation of a new pressed glass ceramic inlay material over 1.5 years. Quintessence lnt 1992; 23: 181–186.
22. Studer S, Lehner C, Scharer P. Glass ceramic inlays and onlays made by IPS Empress®: first clinical results. J Dent Res 1992; 71. (Abstr).
23. Touati B, Miara P. Light transmission in bonded ceramic restoration. J Esthet Dent 1993; 5:10–18.