Learning teleoreactive logic programs from problem solving

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 3625, Issue , 2005, Pages 51-68

  Choi, Dongkyu ^a   Langley, Pat ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LOGIC PROGRAMMING; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROGRAM INTERPRETERS;

LEARNING METHODS; REACTIVE SKILLS; TELEOREACTIVE LOGIC PROGRAMS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 26944433070     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/11536314_4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Benson, S. (1995). Induction learning of reactive action models. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 47-54). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
2. Choi, D., Kaufman, M., Langley, P., Nejati, N., & Shapiro, D. (2004). An architecture for persistent reactive behavior. Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems (pp. 988-995). New York: ACM Press.
3. Erol, K., Hendler, J., & Nau, D. S. (1994). HTN planning: Complexity and expressivity. Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1123-1128). Seattle: MIT Press.
4. Estlin, T. A., & Mooney, R. J. (1997). Learning to improve both efficiency and quality of planning. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1227-1232). Nagoya, Japan.
5. Fern, A., Yoon, S. W., & Givan, R. (2004). Learning domain-specific control knowledge from random walks. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (pp. 191-199). Whistler, BC: AAAI Press.
6. Iba, G. A. (1989). A heuristic approach to the discovery of macro-operators. Machine Learning, 3, 285-317.
7. Laird, J. E., Rosenbloom, P. S., & Newell, A. (1986). Chunking in Soar: The anatomy of a general learning mechanism. Machine Learning, 1, 11-46.
8. Minton, S. N. (1990). Quantitative results concerning the utility of explanation-based learning. Artificial Intelligence, 42, 363-391.
9. Mooney, R. J. (1989). The effect of rule use on the utility of explanation-based learning. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 725-730). Detroit: Morgan Kaufmann.
10. Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1960). Report on a general problem-solving program for a computer. Information Processing: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing (pp. 256-264). UNESCO House, Paris.
11. Nilsson, N. (1994). Teleoreactive programs for agent control. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 1, 139-158.
12. Reddy, C., & Tadepalli, P. (1997). Learning goal-decomposition rules using exercises. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 278-286). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
13. Ruby, D., & Kibler, D. (1991). SteppingStone: An empirical and analytical evaluation. Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 527-532). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
14. Sammut, C. (1996). Automatic construction of reactive control systems using symbolic machine learning. Knowledge Engineering Review, 11, 27-42.
15. Sammut, C., & Banerji, R. B. (1986). Learning concepts by asking questions. In R. S. Michalski, J. G. Carbonell, & T. M. Mitchell (Eds.), Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach (Vol. 2). Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
16. Shavlik, J. W. (1989). Acquiring recursive concepts with explanation-based learning. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 688-693). Detroit, MI: Morgan Kaufmann.
17. Stone, P., &: Veloso, M. M. (2000). Layered learning. Proceedings of the Eleventh European Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 369-381). Barcelona. Springer-Verlag.
18. Sutton, R. S. & Barto, A. G. (1998). Reinforcement learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Utgoff, P., & Stracuzzi, D. (2002). Many-layered learning. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Development and Learning (pp. 141-146).
20. Zelle, J. M., & Mooney, R. J. (1993). Combining FOIL and EBG to speed up logic programs. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1106-1111). Chambery, France: Morgan Kaufmann.