Learning to improve both efficiency and quality of planning

IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 2, Issue , 1997, Pages 1227-1232

  Estlin, Tara A ^a   Mooney, Raymond J ^a  

^a University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EFFICIENCY GAIN; EVALUATION METRICS; FLEXIBLE TRAININGS; OVERALL PLANNING; PLAN QUALITY;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; RESEARCH;

EFFICIENCY;

EID: 84880675583     PISSN: 10450823     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Anthony Barrett, Dave Christianson, Marc Friedman, Chung Kwok, Keith Golden, Scott Penberthy, and Daniel Weld. UCPOP: User's manual (version 4.0). Technical Report 93-09-06d, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, November 1995.
2. Neeraj Bhatnagar and Jack Mostow. On-line learning from search failure. Machine Learning, 15:69-117, 1994.
3. J. Carbonell and et al. PRODIGY4.0: The manual and tutorial. Technical Report CMU-CS-92-150, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg,PA, 1992.
4. Steve Chien, Randall Hill, XueMei Wang, Tara Estlin, Kristina Fayyad, and Helen Mortensen. Why real-world planning is difficult: A tale of two applications. In M. Ghallab and A. Milani, editors, New Directions in Al Planning, pages 287-298. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1996.
5. W. W. Cohen. Learning approximate control rules of high utility. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 268-276, Austin, TX, June 1990.
6. G. F. DeJong and R. J. Mooney. Explanation-based learning: An alternative view. Machine Learning, 1(2): 145-176, 1986.
7. Reprinted in Readings in Machine Learning, J. W. Shavlik and T. G. Dietterich (eds), Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, CA, 1990.
8. Tara A. Estlin and Raymond J. Mooney. Multi-strategy learning of search control for partial-order planning. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Portland, OR, August 1996.
9. Tara A. Estlin. Integrating explanation-based and inductive learning techniques to acquire search-control for planning. Technical Report AI96-250, Department of Computer Sciences, University of Texas, Austin, TX, 1996.
10. O. Etzioni. Acquiring search control knowledge via static analysis. Artificial Intelligence, 60(2), 1993.
11. D. Foulser, M. Li, and Q. Yang. Theory and algorithms for plan merging. Artificial Intelligence, 52:143-181, 1992. (Pubitemid 23586700)
12. Y. Gil. A specification of manufacturing processes for planning. Technical Report CMU-CS-91-179, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 1991.
13. Caroline Hayes. Machining Planning: A Model of an Expert Level Planning Process. PhD thesis, The Robotics Institue, Carnegie Mellon University, December 1990.
14. M. Iwamoto. A planner with quality goal and its speedup learning for optimization problem. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference of AI Planning Systems, Chicago, June 1994.
15. Subbarao Kambhampati, Suresh Katukam, and Yong Qu. Failure driven search control for partial order planners: An explanation based approach. Artificial Intelligence, 88, 1996.
16. R. Korf. Depth-first iterative-deepening: An optimal admissable tree search. Artificial Intelligence, 27(1), 1985.
17. Chistopher Leckie and Ingrid Zuckerman. An inductive approach to learning search control rules for planning. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1100-1105, Chamberry,France, August 1993.
18. S. Minton. Explanation-based learning: A problem solving perspective. Artificial Intelligence, 40:63-118, 1989. (Pubitemid 20607826)
19. Tom M. Mitchell, Richard M. Keller, and Smadar T. Kedar-Cabelli. Explanation-based generalization: A unifying view. Machine Learning, l(l):47-80, 1986.
20. S. H. Muggleton, editor. Inductive Logic Programming. Academic Press, New York, NY, 1992.
21. M. Alicia Perez. Representing and learning quality-improving search control knowledge. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 382-390, Bari,Italy, July 1996.
22. J.R. Quinlan. Learning logical definitions from relations. Machine Learning, 5(3):239-266, 1990.
23. Glenn Silverstein and Michael J. Pazzani. Relational cliches: Constraining constructive induction during relational learning. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Machine Learning, pages 203-207, Evanston, IL, June 1991.
24. Manuela M. Veloso. Learning by Analogical Reasoning in General Problem Solving. PhD thesis, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, August 1992.
25. Robert W. Wilensky. Planning and Understanding: A Computational Approach to Human Reasoning. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1983.
26. Mike Williamson and Steve Hanks. Optimal planning with a goal-directed utility model. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference of AI Planning Systems, pages 176-181, Chicago, June 1994.