Effects of an orientation illusion on motor performance and motor imagery

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 166, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 17-22

  Glover, Scott ^a,c   Dixon, Peter ^b   Castiello, Umberto ^c   Rushworth, Matthew F S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EXPERIMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGERY; IMAGINATION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NORMAL HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; THUMB; VISION; VISUAL INFORMATION;

BRAIN; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; IMAGINATION; MOVEMENT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; POSTURE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 26844516664     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2328-4     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aglioti S, De Souza J, Goodale MA (1995) Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Curr Biol 5:679-685
2. Brenner E, Smeets J (1996) Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object. Exp Brain Res 111:473-476
3. Bridgeman B, Peery S, Anand S (1997) Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of space. Percept Psychophys 59:456-469
4. Brouwer AM, Middelburg T, Smeets JB, Brenner E (2003) Hitting moving targets: a dissociation between the use of the target's speed and the direction of motion. Exp Brain Res 152:368-375
5. Desmurget M, Epstein CM, Turner RS, Prablanc C, Alexander GE, Grafton ST (1999) Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target. Nat Neurosci 2:563-567
6. Dixon P (1998) Why scientists value p values. Psychon Bull Rev 5:390-396
7. Dixon P (2003) The p value fallacy and how to avoid it. Can J Exp Psychol 57:189-202
8. Frak V, Paulignan Y, Jeannerod M (2001) Orientation of the opposition axis during mentally simulated grasping. Exp Brain Res 136:120-127
9. Franz VH, Fahle M, Bulthoff H, Gegenfurtner K (2001) Effects of visual illusions on grasping. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 27:1124-1144
10. Gentilucci M, Chieffi S, Daprati E, Saetti M, Toni I (1996) Visual illusion and action. Neuropsychologia 34:369-376
11. Gentilucci M, Daprati E, Toni I, Chieffi S, Saetti M (1995) Unconscious updating of grasp motor program. Exp Brain Res 105:291-303
12. Glover S (2004) Separate visual representations in the planning and control of actions. Behav Brain Sci 27:3-76
13. Glover S, Dixon P (2001a) Motor adaptation to an optical illusion. Exp Brain Res 137:254-258
14. Glover S, Dixon P (2001b) Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 27:560-572
15. Glover S, Dixon P (2004) Likelihood ratios: a simple, intuitive statistic for empirical psychologists. Psychon Bull Rev 11:791-806
16. Goodman SN, Royall R (1988) Evidence and scientific research. Am J Public Health 78:1568-1574
17. Haffenden AM, Schiff KC, Goodale MA (2001) The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illusion: nonillusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp. Curr Biol 11:177-181
18. Heath M, Rival C, Binsted G (2004) Can the motor system resolve a premovement bias in grip aperture? Online analysis of grasping the Muller-Lyer illusion. Exp Brain Res 158:378-384
19. Johnson SH (2000) Thinking ahead: the case for motor imagery in prospective judgments of prehension. Cognition 74:33-70
20. Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press, Oxford
21. Rosenbaum DA, Vaughn J, Barnes H, Jorgensen M (1992) Time course of movement planning: selection of handgrips for object manipulation. In: Meyers DE, Kornblum S (eds) Attention and performance XIV: synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience. MIT Press, Boston
22. Stelmach GE, Castiello U, Jeannerod M (1994) Orienting the finger opposition space during prehension movements. J Motor Behav 26:178-186