Theoretical and practical reflections on sharing transcripts with participants

Qualitative Health Research

Volumn 15, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1114-1128

  Forbat, Liz ^a   Henderson, Jeanette ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Epistemology; Ethics; Reflexivity; Sensitive subjects; Transcription

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTICLE; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERVIEW; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; TAPE RECORDER; WRITING;

ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERVIEWS;

EID: 26444497116     PISSN: 10497323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1049732305279065     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alldred, P., & Gillies, V., (2002). Eliciting research accounts: Re/producing modern subjects. In M. Mauthner, M. Birch, J. Jessop, & T. Miller (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 146-165). London: Sage.
2. Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. C. (Eds.). (1984). Structures in social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Borland, K. (1991). That's not what I said: Interpretative conflict in oral narrative research. In S. Gluck & D. Patai (Eds.), Women's words: The feminist practice of oral history (pp. 63-76). London: Routledge.
4. Bornat, J. (1993). Presenting. In P. Shakespeare, D. Atkinson, & S. French (Eds.), Reflecting on research practice (pp. 83-94). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
5. Easton, K., McCornish, J., & Greenberg, R. (2000). Avoiding common pitfalls in qualitative data collection and transcription. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 703-708.
6. Forbat, L. (2003). Relationship difficulties in dementia care: A discursive analysis of two women's accounts. Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice, 2(1), 67-84.
7. Forbat, L. (2005). Talking about care: Two sides to the story. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
8. Forbat, L., & Henderson, J(2003). Stuck in the middle with you - The ethics and process of qualitative research with two people in an intimate relationship. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 1453-1462.
9. Greed, C. (1990). The professional and the personal: A study of women quantity surveyors. In L. Stanley (Ed.), Feminist praxis (pp. 145-158). London: Routledge.
10. Grundy, A., Pollon, D., & McGinn, M. (2003). The participant as transcriptionist: Methodological advantages of a collaborative and inclusive research practice. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(2), 1-19.
11. Henderson, J. (2004). Constructions, meanings and experiences of care in mental health. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Open University, Milton Keyes, United Kingdom.
12. Henderson, J., & Forbat, L. (2002). Relationship based social policy: Personal and policy constructions of care. Critical Social Policy, 22(4), 665-683.
13. Josselson, R. (Ed.). (1996). Ethics and process in the narrative study of lives (Vol. 4). London: Sage.
14. Lapadat, J. C. (2000). Problematising transcription: Purpose, paradigm and quality. International Journal of Social Research Methods, 3(3), 203-219.
15. MacLean, L., Meyer, M., & Estable, A. (2004). Improving accuracy of transcripts. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 113-123.
16. Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43-72). London: Academic Press.
17. Plummer, K. (2001). Documents of life: An invitation to critical humanism. London: Sage.
18. Priestly, M. (1997). Who's research? In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Doing disability research (pp. 88-107). Leeds, UK: Disability Press.
19. Rickard, W. (1998). Oral history-More dangerous than therapy? Interviewees' reflections on recording traumatic or taboo issues. Oral History, 26(2), 34-48.
20. Song, M. (1998). Hearing competing voices. In J. Ribbens & R. Edwards (Eds.), Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research (pp. 103-118). London: Sage.
21. Thompson, P. (1988). The voice of the past: Oral history. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
22. Vernon, A. (1997). Reflexivity: The dilemmas of researching from the inside. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Doing disability research (pp. 158-176). Leeds, UK: Disability Press.