Improving accuracy of transcripts in qualitative research

Qualitative Health Research

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 113-123

  MacLean, Lynne M ^a   Meyer, Mechthild ^a   Estable, Alma ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Error; Qualitative methods; Transcription

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; AUDIO RECORDING; AUTOMATIC SPEECH RECOGNITION; CULTURAL FACTOR; EMOTION; HEARING; INTERVIEW; LANGUAGE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RELIABILITY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; STANDARD; VOICE;

DATA COLLECTION; HUMANS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOFTWARE; VOICE;

EID: 1342265229     PISSN: 10497323     EISSN: 15527557     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1049732303259804     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Easton, K. L., McComish, J. F., & Greenberg, R. (2000). Avoiding common pitfalls in qualitative data collection and transcription. Qualitative Health Research, 1, 703-707.
2. Gregory, D., Russell, C. K., & Phillips, L. R. (1997). Beyond textual perfection: Transcriptionists as vulnerable persons. Qualitative Health Research, 7, 294-300.
3. Sandelowski, M. (1994). Focus on qualitative methods: Notes on transcription. Research in Nursing & Health, 17, 311-314.
4. Seale, C., & Silverman, D. (1997). Ensuring rigour in qualitative research. European Journal of Public Health, 7(4), 379-384.
5. Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text, and interaction. London: Sage.
6. Twinn, S. (1998). An analysis of the effectiveness of focus groups as a method of qualitative data collection with Chinese populations in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(3), 654-661.
7. Yelland, J., & Gifford, S. M. (1995). Problems of focus group methods in cross-cultural research: A case study of beliefs about sudden infant death syndrome. Australian Journal of Public Health, 19(3), 257-262.