Avoiding common pitfalls in qualitative data collection and transcription

Qualitative Health Research

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 703-707

  Easton, Kristen L ^a,b   McComish, Judith Fry ^c,d   Greenberg, Rivka ^d  

^a VALPARAISO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Div Comm Programs Hlth E

^d WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERVIEW; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVATION; RECORDING; RESEARCH; REVIEW;

DATA COLLECTION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; OBSERVATION; RESEARCH; TAPE RECORDING;

EID: 0034264402     PISSN: 10497323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104973200129118651     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Ammon-Gaberson, K. B., & Piantanida, M. (1988). Generating results from qualitative data. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 20(3), 159-161.
2. Bamber, S. (1993). Pitfalls and politics: Research on health care in Southwest China. Qualitative Health Research, 3(3), 368-381.
3. Hinds, P. S., Vogel, R. J., & Clarke-Steffen, L. (1997). The possibilities and pitfalls of doing a secondary analysis of a qualitative data set. Qualitative Health Research, 7(3), 408-424.
4. Koehler, J. A., Miller, K. L., Vojir, C. P., Hester, N. O., & Foster, R. L. (1997). Multisite clinical research: A challenge for nursing leaders. Journal of Nursing Administration, 27(7/8), 42-48.
5. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. Martin, P. (1995). Qualitative nursing research: The issues and pitfalls. Nursing Times, 91(12), 44-45.
7. Mays, N., & Pope, C. (1995). Observational methods in health care settings. British Medical Journal, 311, 182-184.