MECCA: Hypermedia capturing of collaborative scientific discourses about movies

Informing Science

Volumn 8, Issue , 2005, Pages 3-38

  Klamma, Ralf ^a   Spaniol, Marc ^a   Jarke, Matthias ^a,b  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FIT   (Germany)

Author keywords

CSCL; Discourse support; Humanities; Hypermedia; MPEG 7

Indexed keywords

EID: 26444489387     PISSN: 15214672     EISSN: 15214672     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.28945/484     Document Type: Review

References (92)

1. Ackerman, M. S. & McDonald, D. W. (1996). AnswerGarden2: Merging organizational memory with collaborative help. Proceedings ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 97-105. New York: ACM Press.
2. van Beek, P., Yoon, K. & Ferman, A. M. (2002). User interaction. In B. S. Manjunath, P. Salembier, & T. Sikora (Eds.), Introduction to MPEG-7 - Multimedia content description interface (pp. 163-175). John Wiley & Sons.
3. Benjamins, V. R. & Fensel, D. (Eds.) (1998). Special issue on problem solving methods. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 49, 4.
4. Berners-Lee, T. (2003). Fitting it all together. Keynote Talk at WWW 2003, Budapest, Hungary.
5. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J. & Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic web. Scientific American, May.
6. Bray, T. (1998). RDF and metadata. Retrieved from http://www.xml.com/pub/ a/98/06/rdf.html
7. Brown, A. L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon A. & Campione, J. C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions - Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 188-228). Cambridge University Press.
8. Bruckman, A. (1994). Programming for fun: MUDs as a context for collaborative learning. Proceedings of the National Educational Computing Conference, Boston, USA.
9. Bruckman, A. (1998). Community support for constructionist learning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7 (1/2), 47-86.
10. Brusilovsky, P. (1996). Methods and techniques for adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 6 (2/3), 87-129.
11. Buckingham Shum, S., Blandford, A., Duke, D. J., Good, J., May, J., Paternò, F. & Young, R. (1996). Multidisciplinary modelling for user-centred system design: An air-traffic control case study. BCS HCI, 201-219.
12. Buckingham Shum, S., Motta, E., Domingue, J. (2000). ScholOnto: An ontology-based digital library server for research documents and discourse. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 3 (3), August/September. Springer-Verlag.
13. Buckingham Shum, S. & Sumner, T. (2001). JIME: An interactive journal for interactive media. Technical Report KMI-TR-99. Knowledge Media Institute, Open University, UK.
14. Bush, V. (1945). As we may think. Atlantic Monthly, 176 (1), 101-108.
15. Carrer, M., Ligresti, L., Ahanger, G. & Little, T. D. C. (1997). An annotation engine for supporting video database population. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 5 (3), 233-258.
16. Collins, A., Brown, J. S. & Newman, S.E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, Learning, and Instruction (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: An introduction and survey. IEEE Computer, 9 (20), 17-41.
18. Daft, R. L. & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32 (5), 554-571.
19. Degenne, A. & Forsé, M. (1991). Introducing social networks. London: Sage Publication.
20. Dhraief, H., Nejdl, W., Wolf, B. & Wolpers, M. (2001). Open learning repositories and metadata modeling. Proceedings of the 1st Semantic Web Working Symposium, Stanford, 495-514.
21. Doerr, M., Hunter, J. & Lagoze, C. (2003). Towards a core ontology for information integration. Journal of Digital Information, 4 (1). Retrieved from http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v04/i01/Doerr/
22. Dönderler, M. E., Saykol, E., Ulusoy, Ö., & Gudukbay, U. (2003). BilVideo: A video database management system. IEEE Multimedia, Multimedia-At-Work, 10 (1), 66-70.
23. Duffy, T. M. & Jonassen, D. H. (Eds.) (1992). Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Dumas, M., Lozano, R., Fauvet, M.-C., Martin, H. & Scholl, P.-C. (2000). Orthogonally modeling video structuration and annotation: Exploiting the concept of granularity. Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop of Spatial and Temporal Granularity, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, USA, 37-43.
25. eXist - Open source native XML database. (2004). Retrieved from http://exist.sourceforge.net/
26. Fendt, K. (2001). Contextualizing content. In M. Knecht & K. von Hammerstein. (Eds.), Languages across the curriculum (pp. 201-223). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Language Resource Center.
27. Fellbaum, C. (1998). WordNet: An electronic lexical database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Foucault, M. (1982). Archeology of knowledge. Pantheon Books.
29. Garzotto, F., Mainetti, L. & Paolini, P. (1995). Hypermedia design, analysis, and evaluation issues. Communications of the ACM, 38 (8), 74-87.
30. von Glasersfeld, E. (1996). Radikaler konstruktivismus, ideen, ergebnisse, probleme. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.
31. Gomez-Peres, A., & Corcho, O. (2002). Ontology languages for the semantic web. IEEE Intelligent Systems 17 (1), 54-60.
32. Golshani, F., & Vissicaro, P. (2002). Design of a multi-ethnic dance information repository. In B. Grosky (Ed.), Proceedings of SOFSEM 2002 Workshop on Multimedia Semantics, Milovy, Czech Republic, November, 27-28.
33. Grosky, W. I., & Sreenath, D. V. (2001). Metadata-mediated browsing and retrieval in semantically-rich cultural image collections. In Proceedings of the 2001 Tokyo Symposium for Digital Silk Roads, Tokyo, Japan.
34. Gruber, T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition, 5 (2), 199-220.
35. Guarino, N. (1998). Formal ontology and information systems. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Formal Ontologies in Information Systems, FOIS'98, Trento, Italy, 3-15.
36. Heflin J. & Hendler J. (2000). Dynamic ontologies on the web. Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2000). AAAI/MIT Press, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 443-449.
37. Henze, N. (2000). Adaptive hyperbooks: Adaptation for project-based learning resources. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hanover.
38. Hillmann, D. (2001). Using Dublin Core, Dublin Core metadata initiative recommendation. Retrieved from http://dublincore.org/documents/2001/04/12/ usageguide
39. Hollender, E., Klamma, R., Börner-Klein, D. & Jarke, M. (2001). A comprehensive electronic study environment for a Talmudic tractate. Dutch Studies - Of the Near Eastern Languages and Literatures (DS-NELL), IV (2), 219-245.
40. Horrocks, I. (1999). FaCT and iFaCT. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Description Logics (DL'99), Linköping, Sweden, CEUR-WS 22, 133-135.
41. Horrocks, I. (2002). DAML+OIL: A reasonable web ontology language. In Jensen et al. (Eds.), EDBT 2002: Conference on Extending Database Technology. Springer Verlag, LNCS 2287, 2-13.
42. Hunter, J. (2001a). Adding multimedia to the semantic web - Building a MPEG-7 ontology. Proceedings of the First Sematinc Web Working Symposium (SWWS), 261-281.
43. Hunter, J. (2001b). MetaNet - A metadata term thesaurus to enable semantic interoperability between metadata domains. Journal of Digital Information, 1 (8).
44. ISO/IEC: Information technology - Multimedia content description interface - Part 8: Extraction and use of MPEG-7 descriptions. (2002). International Organization for Standardization.
45. Jäger, L. (2002). Transkriptivität. Zur medialen logik der kulturellen semantik. In L. Jäger & G. Stanitzek (Eds.), Transkribieren - Medien/Lektüre (pp. 19-41). Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, (in German).
46. Jäger, L. & Stanitzek, G. (Eds.) (2002). Transkribieren - Medien/Lektüre. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, (in German).
47. Jarke, M., Klamma, R. & Lyytinen, K. (2005). Meta modeling. Cambridge: MIT Press, (in print).
48. Jeusfeld, M. (1992). Änderungskontrolle in deduktiven Objektbanken. In DISKI 19, infix Publ. Bad Honnef, Germany. Dissertation, University of Passau, (in German).
49. Jonassen, D. H. & Mandl, H. (Eds). (1990.) Designing hypermedia for learning. Part 1: Hypermedia and learning. Berlin: Springer.
50. Jonassen, D. H., Dyer, D., Peters, K., Robinson, T., Harvey, D., King, M. & Loughner, P. (1997). Cognitive flexible hypertext on the web: Engaging learners in meaning making. In B. H. Khan (Ed.), Web-based Instruction. Englewood Cliffs.
51. Kaplan, S. M., Tolone, W. J., Carroll, A. M., Bogia, D. P. & Bignoli, C. (1992). Supporting collaborative software development with Conversation Builder. Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Software Development Environments, ACM Press, 11-20.
52. Klamma, R., Hollender, E., Jarke, M., Moog, P., & Wulf, V. (2002). Vigils in a wilderness of knowledge: Metadata in learning environments. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2002), Kazan, Russia, September 9-12, 2002, IEEE Learning Technology Task Force, 2002, 519-524.
53. Kietz, J.-U., Maedche, A. & Volz, R. (2000). A method for semi-automatic ontology acquisition from a corporate intranet. In Aussenac-Gilles, Biebow, & Szulman (Eds.), Proceedings of the EKAW '200O Workshop on Ontologies and Texts.
54. Kosch, H. (2002). MPEG-7 and multimedia database systems. SIGMOD Records, ACM Press, 31, June, 34-39.
55. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
56. Lemke, J. L. (2002). Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication, 1(3), 299-325.
57. Lennon, J. & Maurer, H. A. (1996). Aspects of large World Wide Web systems. Proceedings of WebNet 96 - World Conference of the Web Society San Francisco, California, USA, October 15-19, AACE.
58. Ligorio, M. B. (2001). Euroland: A virtual community. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 731.
59. Looi, C.-K., & Ang, D. (2000). A multimedia-enhanced collaborative learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16 (1), 2-13.
60. Maedche, A. & Staab, S. (2001). Learning ontologies for the semantic Web. In Decker, & D. Fensel (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on the Semantic Web - SemWeb 2001.
61. Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Cambridge: MIT Press.
62. Meier, W. (2003). eXist: An open source native XML database. In: A.B. Chaudhri et al. (Eds). Web Databases and Web Services 2002, LNCS 2593, 169-183.
63. Miller, G. A. & Charles, W. G. (1991). Contextual correlates of semantic similarity. Languages and Cognitive Processes 6 (1), 1-28.
64. Miao, Y., Fleschutz, J. M. & Zentel, P. (1999). Enriching learning contexts to support communities of practice. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL), Stanford, USA, 391-397.
65. Motta, E. (1998). An overview of the OCML modelling language. Proceedings of KEML'98: 8th Workshop on Knowledge Engineering Methods & Languages, Karlsruhe, Germany, Jan. 21-22.
66. Mylopoulos, J., Borgida, A., Jarke, M. & Koubarakis, M. (1990). Telos - A language for managing knowledge about information systems. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems, 8 (4), 327-362.
67. Nelson, T. H. (1967). Getting it out of our system. In G. Schlechter (Ed.), Information Retrieval: A Critical Review. Washington, DC: Thompson Books.
68. Nelson, T. H. (1999). Xanalogical structure, needed now more than ever: Parallel documents, deep links to content, deep versioning, and deep re-use. ACM Computing Reviews, 33 (4).
69. Noy, N.F. & Musen, M.A. (2002). PROMPTDIFF: A fixed-point algorithm for comparing ontology versions. Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 744-750.
70. Pfister, H.-R., Wessner, M., Holmer T. & Steinmetz, R. (1999). Negotiating about shared knowledge in a cooperative learning environment. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL), Stanford, USA, 454-457.
71. Porush, D. (1994). Educating the Hebrew brain. Katadion, Spring 1994.
72. Preston, J. A. & Wilson, L. (2001). Offering CS1 on-line reducing campus resource demand while improving the learning environment. SIGCSE Bulletin, 33 (1), 342-346.
73. Resnik, P. (1998). Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: An Information-Based Measure and its Application to Problems of Ambiguity in Natural Language. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 11, 98-130.
74. Reynolds, D. (2001). An RDF framework for resource discovery. In Decker, D. Fensel D., et al. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on the Semantic Web - SemWeb 2001.
75. Rodriguez, A. & Egenhofer, M.J. (2003). Determining semantic similarity among entity classes from different ontologies. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 15, 442-456.
76. Rodriguez, F. G., Silva, J. L. P., Rosano, F. L., Contreras, F. C., & Vitela, A. M. (2001). Creating a high school physics video-based laboratory. IEEE Multimedia, 8 (3), 78-86.
77. Salembier, P. & Sikora, T. (Eds.) (2002). Introduction to MPEG-7 - Multimedia content description interface. John Wiley & Sons.
78. Schmidt, J. W., Sehring, H.-W. & Warnke, M. (2001). Der bildindex zur politischen ikonographie in der Warburg Electronic Library -Einsichten eines interdisziplinären Projektes. In Archivprozesse, (in German).
79. Schmitz, D. (2003). Adressierung digitaler Medien mittels Community-basierter Agententechnik. Proceedings of: Informatiktage, Bad Schussenried, Germany, November 8-9, (in German).
80. Schär, S.G. & Krueger, H. (2000). Using new learning technologies with multimedia. IEEE Multimedia, 7 (3), 40-51.
81. Scollon, R. (1999). Mediated discourse and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32 (1&2), 149-154.
82. nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
83. Smith, B. & Welty, C. (2001). Ontology: Towards a new synthesis. In C. Welty, & B. Smith, (Eds.), Formal Ontology in Information System (pp. iii-x.). Ongunquit, Maine: ACM.
84. Smith, B., Welty, C. & McGuinness, D. L. (2004). OWL web ontology language Guide. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/
85. Smith, B. K., Blankinship, E. & Lackner, T. (2000). Annotation and education. IEEE Multimedia, 7 (2), 84-89.
86. Sumner, T. & Buckingham Shum, S. (1998). From documents to discourse: shifting conceptions of scholarly publishing. Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (CHI), 95-102.
87. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychology Review, 84, 327-352.
88. Wagstaff, J. (2004). Wikipedia: It's wicked. The Wall Street Journal Online, Loose Wire. Retrieved from http://www.theproduct.com/6m105/readings/ spring04/encyclopedia.pdf.
89. Westermann, U. & Klas, W. (2003). An analysis of XML database solutions for the management of MPEG-7 media descriptions. ACM Computing Survey, 35 (4, December), 331-373.
90. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
91. Wikipedia. (2004). Michel Foucault. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Michel_Foucault
92. World Wide Web Consortium: Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification. (1999) Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf- syntax/.