Constructing a multi-objective measure of research performance

Scientometrics

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 383-402

  Nagpaul, P S ^a   Roy, Santanu ^b  

^a National Institute of Science Technology and Development Studies ^*  (India)

^b National Institute of Science Technology and Development Studies India   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4243107769     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022382904996     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. ANON (January, 1993), Research Performance Indicators Survey, National Board of Employment, Education and Training, Commissioned Report No. 21, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, Australia.
2. BACKES-GELLNER, D. SADOWSKI (1990), Organizational implementation of bibliometric indicators, Scientometrics, 18:385-395.
3. BHARGAVA, M., C. DUBELLAR, S. RAMASWAMI (1994), Reconciling diverse measures of performance: A conceptual framework and test of a methodology, Journal of Business Research, 31:233-246.
4. BIRNBAUM, P. H. (1979), Some relationship between job satisfaction and organizational climate, Journal of Applied Psychology, 59:318-328.
5. BRAUN, T., W. GLÄNZEL, A. SCHUBERT (1993), Scientometric indicators datafiles, 1980-1989, Scientometrics, 28:137-150.
6. BRAUN, T., W. GLÄNZEL, H. MACZELKA, A. SCHUBERT (1994), World science in the eighties: National performances in publication output and citation impact, 1985-1989 versus 1980-1984, Part I: All science fields combined, physics and chemistry, Scientometrics, 29:299-334,
7. Part II: Life sciences, engineering, and mathematics, Scientometrics, 31:3-30.
8. COLE, G. (1979), Classifying research units by performance and influence: Typology of Round 1 data, In: F.M. Andrews (Ed.) Scientific Productivity, UNESCO; Cambridge University Press.
9. COOPER, W. W., A. COOPER, L. M. SEIFORD (2000 a), Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications, Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10. COOPER, W. W., L. M. SEIFORD, K. TONE (2000 b), Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA- Solver Software, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers (page XIX).
11. DE HEMPTINNE, Y., F. M. ANDREWS (1979), The international study on the organization and performance of research units: An overview, In: F. M. ANDREWS (Ed.), Scientific Productivity, UNESCO: Cambridge University Press.
12. Fox, M. F. (1983), Publication productivity among scientists: A critical review, Social Studies of Science, 13:285-305.
13. GRUPPE, H., S. MAITAL, A. FRENKEL, K. KOSCHTZKY (1992), A data envelopment analysis to compare technological excellence and export sales of Israel and European Community countries, Research Evaluation, 87-101.
14. HAGSTROM, W.O. (1965), The Scientific Community, New York: Basic Books.
15. HUNYA, P. (1976), A Ranking Procedure Based on Partially Ordered Sets, Internal Report, József Attila University, Laboratory of Cybernetics, Szeged (Hungary).
16. IRVINE, J. (1989), Evaluation of scientific institutions: Lessons from a bibliometric study of a UK Technical university, In: D. EVERED, S. HARNET (Eds), The Evaluation of Scientific Research, John Wiley & Sons.
17. JOHNES, G., J. JOHNES (1992), Apples and oranges: The aggregation problem in publication analysis, Scientometrics, 25:353-365.
18. JOHNES, G., J. JOHNES (1993), Measuring the research performance of UK Economics departments: An application of data envelopment analysis, Oxford Economics Papers, 45:323-347.
19. KEENEY, R., H. RAIFFA (1993), Decisions with Multiple Objectives. Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. KOSTOFF, R. N. (1992), Research impact assessment, Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Management of Technology, Miami, FL(USA), 19-21 February.
21. KOSTOFF, R. N. (1996), The Handbook of Research Impact Assessment, DTIC Report No. ADA 296021, Arlington, VA (USA): Office of Naval Research, (page.37).
22. MARCSON, S. (1966), Scientists in Organizations: Business and Government, Brunswick, NJ (USA): Rutgers University Press.
23. MARK, M., G. T. HENRY, G. JULNES (2000), Evaluation: an Integrated Framework for Understanding, Guiding and Improving Policies and Programs, San-Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
24. MAZLISH, B. (1982), The quality of science - An evaluation, In: M. C. LaFallote (Ed.), Quality of Science, Cambridge: MIT Press, 48-67.
25. NAGPAUL, P. S. (1987), Organization and Efficiency of Research Groups, New Delhi (India): National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies.
26. NAGPAUL, P. S. (2001), Guide to Advanced Data Analysis Using IDAMS Software, http://www.unesco.org/idams
27. ROGERS, M., L. BRUEN, Y. MAYSTRE (1999), ELECTRE and Decision Support - Methods and Applications in Engineering and Infrastructure Investment, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
28. ROUSSEAU, S., R. ROUSSEAU (1997), Data envelopment analysis as a tool for constructing scientometric indicators, Scientometrics, 40:45-56.
29. ROUSSEAU, S., R. ROUSSEAU (1998), The scientific wealth of European nations: Taking effectiveness into account, Scientmetrics, 42:75-87.
30. ROY, B. (1991), The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods, Theory and Decision, 31:49-73.
31. ROY, B. (1990), Decision-aid and decision-making, European Journal of Operational Research, 45:324-331.
32. ROY, B., D. VANDERPOOTEN (1996), The European School of MCDA: A historical review, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 5:22-38.
33. TRIANTAPHYLLOU, E. (2000), Multicriteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study, Kluwer Academic Press.
34. WEBER, M., K. BORCHRDING (1993), Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multiattribute decision making, European Journal of Operational Research, 67:1-12.