Pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass devices: Trends in device use for cardiopulmonary bypass and postcardiotomy support

ASAIO Journal

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 525-529

  Groom, Robert C ^a  

^a MAINE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS; DIFFUSION; MEDICAL IMAGING; PATIENT MONITORING; PEDIATRICS; PULMONARY DISEASES; RUBBER; SILICON; SURGERY;

CARDIAC SURGERY; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS (CPB); HEPARIN; RUBBER MEMBRANES;

CARDIOLOGY;

SILICON;

CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CONFERENCE PAPER; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; DEVICE; EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCULATION; FILTER; HEART SURGERY; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; OXYGENATOR; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; SAFETY; TECHNIQUE;

CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CHILD; EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES, HOSPITAL; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; NORTH AMERICA; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; THORACIC SURGERY;

EID: 26444439151     PISSN: 10582916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mat.0000180399.24938.a5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Rand PW, Chatterjee M, Austin WH, Drake EH: The development of an open-heart surgery program in a community hospital. J Maine Med Assoc 52: 233-237, 1961.
2. Clowes CH Jr, Hopkins AL, Neville WE: An artificial lung dependent upon diffusion of oxygen and carbon dioxide through plastic membranes. J Thorac Surg 32: 630-637, 1956.
3. Hill AC, Groom RC, Akl BF, et al: Current pediatric perfusion practice in North America. Perfusion 8: 27-38, 1993.
4. Groom RC, Hill AG, Kurusz M, et al: Paediatric perfusion practice in North America: An update. Perfusion 10: 393-401, 1995.
5. Cecere C, Groom RC, Forest R, et al: A 10-year review of pediatric perfusion practice in North America. Perfusion 17: 83-89, 2002.
6. Groom RC, Froebe S, Martin J, Quinn R, et al: An update on pediatric perfusion practice in North America: 2004 survey. J Extra Corpor Technol, in press.
7. Cooley DA: Development of the roller pump for use in the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit. Texas Heart Inst J 14: 113-118, 1987.
8. Debakey ME: A simple continuous-flow blood transfusion instrument. New Orleans Med Surg J 87: 386-389, 1934.
9. Lynch MF, Peterson D, Baker V: Centrifugal blood pumping for open heart surgery. Minn Med 61: 536-537, 1978.
10. Stammers AH, Mejak BL: An update on perfusion safety: Does the type of perfusion practice affect the rate of incidents related to cardiopulmonary bypass? Perfusion 16: 189-198, 2001.
11. Kolff J, Ankney RN, Wurzel D, Devineni R: Centrifugal pump failures. J Extra Corpor Technol 28: 118-122, 1996.
12. Vocelka CR, Thomas R: An in vitro evaluation of an automatic clamp for use with centrifugal pumps. J Extra Corpor Technol 29: 154-157, 1997.
13. Jegger D, Tevaearai HT, Mueller XM, et al: Limitations using the vacuum-assist venous drainage technique during cardiopulmonary bypass procedures. J Extra Corpor Technol 35: 207-211, 2003.
14. Ojita JW,Hannan RL, Miyaji K, et al: Assisted venous drainage cardiopulmonary bypass in congenital heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 71: 1267-1271, 2001.
15. Parolari A, Alamanni F, Naliato M, et al: Adult cardiac surgery outcomes: Role of the pump type. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 18: 575-582, 2000.
16. Rider SP, Simon LV, Rice BJ, Poulton CC: Assisted venous drainage, venous air, and gaseous microemboli transmission into the arterial line: an in-vitro study. J Extra Corpor Technol 30: 160-165, 1998.
17. Willcox TW, Mitchell SJ, German DF: Venous air in the bypass circuit: a source of arterial line emboli exacerbated by vacuum-assisted drainage. Ann Thorac Surg 68: 1285-1289, 1999.
18. Jones TJ, Deal DD, Vernon JC, et al: Does vacuum-assisted venous drainage increase gaseous microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass? Ann Thorac Surg 74: 2132-2137, 2002.
19. Willcox TW: Vacuum-assisted venous drainage: To air or not to air, that is the question. Has the bubble burst? J Extra Corpor Technol 34: 24-28, 2002.
20. Groom RC, Likosky DS, Forest RJ, et al: A model for cardiopulmonary bypass redesign. Perfusion 19: 257-261, 2004.
21. Brooker RF, Brown WR, Moody DM, et al: Cardiotomy suction: A major source of brain lipid emboli during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 65: 1651-1655, 1998.
22. Jensen E, Andreasson S, Bengtsson A, et al: Influence of two different perfusion systems on inflammatory response in pediatric heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 75: 919-925, 2003.
23. Morgan IS, Codispoti M, Sanger K, Mankad PS: Superiority of centrifugal pump over roller pump in paediatric cardiac surgery: Prospective randomised trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 13: 526-532, 1998.
24. Courlay T, Stefanou DC, Asimakopoulos C, Taylor KM: The effect of circuit surface area on CD11b(mac-1) expression in a rat recirculation model. Artif Organs 25: 475-479, 2001.
25. Courlay T, Stefanou D, Taylor KM: The effect of methanol washing of plasticized polyvinyl chloride on biomaterial-contact-mediated CD11b (mac-1) expression in a rat recirculation model. Artif Organs 26: 5-9, 2002.
26. Stammers AH, Christensen KA, Lynch J, et al: Quantitative evaluation of heparin-coated versus non-heparin-coated bypass circuits during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Extra Corpor Technol 31: 135-141, 1999.
27. Grossi EA, Kallenbach K, Chau S, et al: Impact of heparin bonding on pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass: A prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg 70: 191-196, 2000.
28. Ozawa T, Yoshihara K, Koyama N, et al: Superior biocompatibility of heparin-bonded circuits in pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 47: 592-599, 1999.
29. Jensen E, Andreasson S, Bengtsson A, et al: Changes in hemostasis during pediatric heart surgery: Impact of a biocompatible heparin-coated perfusion system. Ann Thorac Surg 77: 962-967, 2004.
30. Naik SK, Knight A, Elliott MJ: A successful modification of ultrafiltration for cardiopulmonary bypass in children. Perfusion 6: 41-50, 1991.
31. Darling E, Nanry K, Shearer I, et al: Techniques of paediatric modified ultrafiltration: 1996 survey results. Perfusion 13: 93-103, 1998.
32. Kolobow T, Spragg RG, Pierce JE, Zapol WM: Extended term (to 16 days) partial extracorporeal blood gas exchange with the spiral membrane lung in unanesthetized lambs. ASAIO Trans 17: 350-354, 1971.
33. Jacobs JP, Ojito JW, McConaghey TW, et al: Rapid cardiopulmonary support for children with complex congenital heart disease. Ann Thorac Surg 70: 742-749, 2000.
34. Trittenwein G, Golej J, Burda G, et al: Neonatal and pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation using nonocclusive blood pumps: The Vienna experience. Artif Organs 25: 994-999, 2001.
35. Karimova A, Robertson A, Cross N, et al: A wet-primed extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit with hollow-fiber membrane oxygenator maintains adequate function for use during cardiopulmonary resuscitation after 2 weeks on standby. Crit Care Med 33: 1572-1576, 2005.
36. Allison PL, Kurusz M, Graves DF, Zwischenberger JB: Devices and monitoring during neonatal ECMO: survey results. Perfusion 5: 193-201, 1990.
37. Lawson DS, Walczak R, Lawson AF, et al: North American neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) devices: 2002 survey results. J Extra Corpor Technol 36: 16-21, 2004.
38. Gunst G, Terry B, Melchoir R, et al: 2004 Survey of ECMO in the neonate following open-heart surgery. J Extra Corpor Technol 37, in press.
39. Norton S, Thuys C, Bennett M, et al: Experience with the Jostra Rotaflow and QuadroxD oxygenator for ECMO. Perfusion 19: 17-23, 2004.
40. Iwahashi H, Yuri K, Nose Y: Development of the oxygenator: past, present, and future. Artif Organs 7: 111-120, 2004.
41. Motomura T, Maeda T, Kawahito S, et al: Development of silicone rubber hollow fiber membrane oxygenator for ECMO. Artif Organs 27: 1050-1053, 2003.
42. Stammers AH, Mejak BL, Rauch ED, et al: Factors affecting perfusionists' decisions on equipment utilization: results of a United States survey. J Extra Corpor Technol 32: 4-10, 2000.
43. Rodgers E: Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed. New York, Free Press. 1995. pp. 7-31.
44. Groom RC, Likosky DS, Forest RJ, et al: A model for cardiopulmonary bypass redesign. Perfusion 19: 257-261, 2004.