Atherosclerotic vascular disease conference: Writing group IV: Imaging

Circulation

Volumn 109, Issue 21, 2004, Pages 2626-2633

  Olin, Jeffrey W ^a   Kaufman, John A ^a   Bluemke, David A ^a   Bonow, Robert O ^a   Gerhard, Marie D ^a   Jaff, Michael R ^a   Rubin, Geoffrey D ^a   Hall, Winthrop ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

AHA Conference Proceedings; Aneurysms; Imaging; Peripheral vascular diseases

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA; ANGIOGRAPHY; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING; THORACIC AORTA;

ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FORECASTING; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, DUPLEX;

EID: 2642563641     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000128521.02390.72     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (97)

1. Nelson TR, Pretorius DH. The Doppler signal: where does it come from and what does it mean? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;151:439-447.
2. Hirsch AT, Criqui MH, Treat-Jacobson D, et al. Peripheral arterial disease detection, awareness, and treatment in primary care. JAMA. 2001;286:1317-1324.
3. Criqui MH, Langer RD, Fronek A, et al. Mortality over a period of 10 years in patients with peripheral arterial disease. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:381-386.
4. O'Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, et al. Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults: Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:14-22.
5. Corretti MC, Anderson TJ, Benjamin EJ, et al. Guidelines for the ultrasound assessment of endothelial-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery: a report of the International Brachial Artery Reactivity Task Force [published correction appears in J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1082]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:257-265.
6. Corretti MC, Anderson TJ, Benjamin EJ, et al. Guidelines for the ultrasound assessment of endothelial-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery: a report of the International Brachial Artery Reactivity Task Force [published correction appears in J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1082]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:257-265.
7. Ashton HA, Buxton MJ, Day NE, et al. The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360:1531-1539.
8. Kohler TR, Nance DR, Cramer MM, et al. Duplex scanning for diagnosis of aortoiliac and femoropopliteal disease: a prospective study. Circulation. 1997;76:1074-1080.
9. Elsman BH, Legemate DA, van der Heyden FW, et al. The use of color-coded duplex scanning in the selection of patients with lower extremity arterial disease for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty: a prospective study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1996;19:313-316.
10. Whelan JF, Barry MH, Moir JD. Color flow Doppler ultrasonography: comparison with peripheral arteriography for the investigation of peripheral vascular disease. J Clin Ultrasound. 1992;20:369-374.
11. Silke CM, Grouden MC, Nicholls S, et al. Noninvasive follow-up of peripheral angioplasty: a prospective study. J Vasc Technol. 1997;21:23-25.
12. Mewissen MW, Kinney EV, Bandyk DF, et al. The role of duplex scanning versus angiography in predicting outcome after balloon angioplasty in the femoropopliteal artery. J Vasc Surg. 1992;15:860-865.
13. Bandyk DF. Ultrasonic duplex scanning in the evaluation of arterial grafts and dilatations. Echocardiography. 1987;4:251-264.
14. Mattos MA, van Bemmelen PS, Hodgson KJ, et al. Does correction of stenoses identified with color duplex scanning improve infrainguinal graft patency? J Vasc Surg. 1993;17:54-64.
15. Bandyk DF. Postoperative surveillance of infrainguinal bypass. Surg Clin North Am. 1990;70:71-85.
16. AbuRahma AF, Covelli MA, Robinson PA, et al. The role of carotid duplex ultrasound in evaluating plaque morphology: potential use in selecting patients for carotid stenting. J Endovasc Surg. 1999;6:59-65.
17. Fell G, Phillips DJ, Chikos PM, et al. Ultrasonic duplex scanning for disease of the carotid artery. Circulation. 1981;64:1191-1195.
18. Kirsch JD, Wagner LR, James EM, et al. Carotid artery occlusion: positive predictive value of duplex sonography compared with arteriography. J Vasc Surg. 1994;19:642-649.
19. Golledge J, Cuming R, Ellis M, et al. Duplex imaging findings predict stenosis after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 1997;26:43-48.
20. Taylor DC, Kettler MD, Moneta GL, et al. Duplex ultrasound scanning in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: a prospective evaluation. J Vasc Surg. 1988;7:363-369.
21. Strandness DE Jr. Duplex imaging for the detection of renal artery stenosis. Am J Kidney Dis. 1994;24:674-678.
22. Olin JW, Piedmonte MR, Young JR, et al. The utility of duplex ultrasound scanning of the renal arteries for diagnosing significant renal artery stenosis. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:833-838.
23. Radermacher J, Chavan A, Bleck J, et al. Use of Doppler ultrasonography to predict the outcome of therapy for renal-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:410-417.
24. Hansen KJ, Tribble RW, Reavis SW. et al. Renal duplex sonography: evaluation of clinical utility. J Vasc Surg. 1990;12:227-236.
25. LaPema L, Olin JW, Goines D, et al. Ultrasound-guided thrombin injection for the treatment of postcatheterization pseudoaneurysms. Circulation. 2000;102:2391-2395.
26. Earls JP, Rofsky NM, DeCorato DR, et al. Breath-hold single-dose gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR aortography: usefulness of a timing examination and MR power injector. Radiology. 1996;201:705-710.
27. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Jacoby WT, et al. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the thoracic aorta. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:1387-1397.
28. Prince MR. Body MR angiography with gadolinium contrast agents. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1996;4:11-24.
29. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, et al. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology. 1995;197:785-792.
30. Wolff KA, Herold CJ, Tempany CM, et al. Aortic dissection: atypical patterns seen at MR imaging. Radiology. 1991;181:489-495.
31. Snidow JJ, Johnson MS, Harris VJ, et al. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for aortoiliac inflow assessment plus renal artery screening in a single breath hold. Radiology. 1996;198:725-732.
32. Steffens JC, Link J, Grassner J, et al. Contrast-enhanced, K-space-centered, breath-hold MR angiography of the renal arteries and the abdominal aorta. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7:617-622.
33. Hany TF, Debatin JF, Leung DA, et al. Evaluation of the aortoiliac and renal arteries: comparison of breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional catheter angiography. Radiology. 1997;204:357-362.
34. De Cobelli F, Vanzulli A, Sironi S, et al. Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced versus three-dimensional, phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology. 1997;205:689-695.
35. Rieumont MJ, Kaufman JA, Geller SC, et al. Evaluation of renal artery stenosis with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:39-44.
36. Bakker J, Beek FJ, Beutler JJ, et al. Renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries: accuracy of detection and visualization with gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography. Radiology. 1998;207:497-504.
37. Schoenberg SO, Bock M, Knopp MV, et al. Renal arteries: optimization of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with bolus-timing-independent fast multiphase acquisition in a single breath hold. Radiology. 1999;211:667-679.
38. Hahn U, Miller S, Nagele T, et al. Renal MR angiography at 1.0 T: three-dimensional (3D) phase-contrast techniques versus gadolinium-enhanced 3D fast low-angle shot breath-hold imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:1501-1508.
39. Fain SB, King BF, Breen JF, et al. High-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries: a prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Radiology. 2001;218:481-490.
40. Grist TM. MRA of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;11:32-43.
41. Earls JP, DeSena S, Bluemke DA. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the entire aorta and iliac arteries with dynamic manual table translation. Radiology. 1998;209:844-849.
42. Rofsky NM, Johnson G, Adelman MA, et al. Peripheral vascular disease evaluated with reduced-dose gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology. 1997;205:163-169.
43. Wasserman BA, Smith WI, Trout HH 3rd, et al. Carotid artery atherosclerosis: in vivo morphologic characterization with gadolinium-enhanced double-oblique MR imaging initial results. Radiology. 2002;223:566-573.
44. Fernandez-Ortiz A, Badimon JJ, Falk E, et al. Characterization of the relative thrombogenicity of atherosclerotic plaque components: implications for consequences of plaque rupture. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:1562-1569.
45. Helft G, Worthley SG, Fuster V, et al. Atherosclerotic aortic component quantification by noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging: an in vivo study in rabbits. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1149-1154.
46. Choudhury RP, Aguinaldo JG, Rong JX, et al. Atherosclerotic lesions in genetically modified mice quantified in vivo by non-invasive high-resolution magnetic resonance microscopy. Atherosclerosis. 2002;162:315-321.
47. Toussaint JF, Southern JF, Fuster V, et al. T2-weighted contrast for NMR characterization of human atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:1533-1542.
48. Serfaty JM, Chaabane L, Tabib A, et al. Atherosclerotic plaques: classification and characterization with T2-weighted high-spatial-resolution MR imaging: an in vitro study. Radiology. 2001;219:403-410.
49. Shinnar M, Fallon JT, Wehrli S, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of ex vivo MRI for human atherosclerotic plaque characterization. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19:2756-2761.
50. Adam G, Neuerburg J, Bucker A, et al. Interventional magnetic resonance: initial clinical experience with a 1.5-tesla magnetic resonance system combined with c-arm fluoroscopy. Invest Radiol. 1997;32:191-197.
51. Yang X, Bolster BD Jr, Kraitchman DL, et al. Intravascular MR-monitored balloon angioplasty: an in vivo feasibility study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1998;9:953-959.
52. Yang X, Atalar E, Li D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging permits in vivo monitoring of catheter-based vascular gene delivery. Circulation. 2001;104:1588-1590.
53. Yang X, Atalar E. Intravascular MR imaging-guided balloon angioplasty with an MR imaging guide wire: feasibility study in rabbits. Radiology. 2000;217:501-506.
54. Buecker A, Neuerburg JM, Adam GB, et al. Real-time MR fluoroscopy for MR-guided iliac artery stent placement. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12:616-622.
55. Kee ST, Rhee JS, Butts K, et al. 1999 Gary J. Becker Young Investigator Award: MR-guided transjugular portosystemic shunt placement in a swine model. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10:529-535.
56. Manke C, Nitz WR, Djavidani B, et al. MR imaging-guided stent placement in iliac arterial stenoses: a feasibility study. Radiology. 2001;219:527-534.
57. Rubin GD. Techniques for performing multidetector-row computed tomographic angiography. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;4:2-14.
58. Bluemke DA, Chambers TP. Spiral CT angiography: an alternative to conventional angiography. Radiology. 1995;195:317-319.
59. Rubin GD. Three-dimensional helical CT angiography. Radiographics. 1994;14:905-912.
60. Ibukuro K, Charnsangavej C, Chasen MH, et al. Helical CT angiography with multiplanar reformation: techniques and clinical applications. Radiographics. 1995;15:671-682.
61. Addis KA, Hopper KD, Iyriboz TA, et al. CT angiography: in vitro comparison of five reconstruction methods. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:1171-1176.
62. Marcus CD, Ladam-Marcus VJ, Bigot JL, et al. Carotid arterial stenosis: evaluation at CT angiography with the volume-rendering technique. Radiology. 1999;211:775-780.
63. Anderson GB, Ashforth R, Steinke DE, et al. CT angiography for the detection and characterization of carotid artery bifurcation disease. Stroke. 2000;31:2168-2174.
64. Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Radiology. 2001;220:179-185.
65. Patel SG, Collie DA, Wardlaw JM, et al. Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73:21-28.
66. Magarelli N, Scarabino T, Simeone AL, et al. Carotid stenosis: a comparison between MR and spiral CT angiography. Neuroradiology. 1998;40:367-373.
67. Sameshima T, Futami S, Morita Y, et al. Clinical usefulness of and problems with three-dimensional CT angiography for the evaluation of atherosclerotic stenosis of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional angiography, MRA, and ultrasound sonography. Surg Neurol. 1999;51:301-308.
68. Thorsen MK, San Dretto MA, Lawson TL, et al. Dissecting aortic aneurysms: accuracy of computed tomographic diagnosis. Radiology. 1983;148:773-777.
69. Nienaber CA, von Kodolitsch Y, Nicolas V, et al. The diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection by noninvasive imaging procedures. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1-9.
70. Sommer T, Fehske W, Holzknecht N, et al. Aortic dissection: a comparative study of diagnosis with spiral CT, multiplanar transesophageal echocardiography, and MR imaging. Radiology. 1996;199:347-352.
71. Bromley PJ, Kaufman JA. Abdominal aortic aneurysms before and after endograft implantation: evaluation by computed tomography. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;4:15-26.
72. Armerding MD, Rubin GD, Beaulieu CF, et al. Aortic aneurysmal disease: Assessment of stent-graft treatment: CT versus conventional angiography. Radiology. 2000;215:138-146.
73. Qanadli SD, Mesurolle B, Coggia M, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: pretherapy assessment with dual-slice helical CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:181-187.
74. Thurnher SA, Dorffner R, Thurnher MM, et al. Evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm for stent-graft placement: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography versus helical CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology. 1997;205:341-352.
75. Sawhney R, Kerlan RK, Wall SD, et al. Analysis of initial CT findings after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Radiology. 2001;220:157-160.
76. Rubin GD, Dake MD, Napel S, et al. Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: comparison of three-dimensional rendering techniques. Radiology. 1994;190:181-189.
77. Rubin GD, Alfrey EJ, Dake MD, et al. Assessment of living renal donors with spiral CT. Radiology. 1995;195:457-462.
78. Pozniak MA, Balison DJ, Lee FT Jr, et al. CT angiography of potential renal transplant donors. Radiographics. 1998;18:565-587.
79. Urban BA, Ratner LE, Fishman EK. Three-dimensional volume-rendered CT angiography of the renal arteries and veins: normal anatomy, variants, and clinical applications. Radiographics. 2001;21:373-386.
80. Beregi JP, Elkohen M, Deklunder G, et al. Helical CT angiography compared with arteriography in the detection of renal artery stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:495-501.
81. Johnson PT, Halpern EJ, Kuszyk BS, et al. Renal artery stenosis: CT angiography: comparison of real-time volume-rendering and maximum intensity projection algorithms. Radiology. 1999;211:337-343.
82. Willmann JK, Wildermuth S, Pfammatter T, et al. Aortoiliac and renal arteries: prospective intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology. 2003;226:798-811.
83. Rubin GD, Shiau MC, Leung AN, et al. Aorta and iliac arteries: single versus multiple detector-row helical CT angiography. Radiology. 2000;215:670-676.
84. Rubin GD, Schmidt AJ, Logan LJ, et al. Multi-detector row CT angiography of lower extremity arterial inflow and runoff: initial experience. Radiology. 2001;221:146-158.
85. Ofer A, Nitecki SS, Linn S, et al. Multidetector CT angiography of peripheral vascular disease: a prospective comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:719-724.
86. Katz DS, Hon M. CT angiography of the lower extremities and aortoiliac system with a multi-detector row helical CT scanner: promise of new opportunities fulfilled. Radiology. 2001;221:7-10.
87. Rieker O, Duber C, Neufang A, et al. CT angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for assessment of aortoiliac occlusive disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:1133-1138.
88. Bosanac Z, Miller RJ, Jain M. Rotational digital subtraction carotid angiography: technique and comparison with static digital subtraction angiography. Clin Radiol. 1998;53:682-687.
89. Seymour HR, Matson MB, Belli AM, et al. Rotational digital subtraction angiography of the renal arteries: technique and evaluation in the study of native and transplant renal arteries. Br J Radiol. 2001;74:134-141.
90. Unno N, Mitsuoka H, Takei Y, et al. Virtual angioscopy using 3-dimensional rotational digital subtraction angiography for endovascular assessment. J Endovasc Ther. 2002;9:529-534.
91. Meijering EH, Niessen WJ, Bakker J, et al. Reduction of patient motion artifacts in digital subtraction angiography: evaluation of a fast and fully automatic technique. Radiology. 2001;219:288-293.
92. Ashleigh RJ, Hufton AP, Razzaq R, et al. A comparison of bolus chasing and static digital subtraction arteriography in peripheral vascular disease. Br J Radiol. 2000;73:819-824.
93. Spinosa DJ, Kaufmann JA, Hartwell GD. Gadolinium chelates in angiography and interventional radiology: a useful alternative to iodinated contrast media for angiography. Radiology. 2002;223:319-325.
94. Oliva VL, Denbow N, Therasse E, et al. Digital subtraction angiography of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities: carbon dioxide versus iodinated contrast material. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10:723-731.
95. Iwasaki S, Yokoyama K, Takayama K, et al. The transradial approach for selective carotid and vertebral angiography. Acta Radiol. 2002;43:549-555.
96. Leffers AM, Wagner A. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: a retrospective study of complication rate and patient risk factors. Acta Radiol. 2000;41:204-210.
97. Young N, Chi KK, Ajaka J, et al. Complications with outpatient angiography and interventional procedures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2002;25:123-126.