Comparison between conventional radiography and digital radiography for various kVp and mAs settings using a pelvic phantom

Radiography

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 119-125

  Al Khalifah, K ^a   Brindhaban, A ^a  

^a KUWAIT UNIVERSITY   (Kuwait)

Author keywords

Computed radiography; Film screen radiography; Image quality; Radiographic technique

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEVICE; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; IMAGE QUALITY; PELVIS RADIOGRAPHY; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; X RAY FILM;

EID: 2642562848     PISSN: 10788174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2004.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Sagel SS, Jost G, Glazer HS, et al. Digital mobile radiography. J Thorac Imaging 1990;5:36-48.
2. Kimme-Smith C, Aberle DR, Sayre JW, et al. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of the chest. AJR 1995;165:269-73.
3. Lee KR, Siegal EL, Templeton AW, et al. State of art digital radiography. Radiographics 1991;11:1013-25.
4. Peters PE, Dykstra DE, Wiesmann W, et al. Cost comparison between storage phosphor computed radiography and conventional film-screen radiography in intensive care medicine. Radiology 1992;32:536-40.
5. Al-Balool GS, Newman DL. The relationships between kV, mAs and thickness in film-based radiography: 25% and 15% rules OK? Radiography 1998;4:129-34.
6. Bindeus T, Vrba S, Galber C, et al. Comparison of computed radiography and conventional film-screen radiography of the equine stifle. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2002;43:455-60.
7. Piraino DW, Davros WJ, Lieber M, et al. Selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography of the hands and feet: a subjective comparison. AJR 1999;172:177-84.
8. Swee RG, Gray JE, Beabout JW, et al. Screen-film versus computed radiography imaging of the hand: a direct comparison. AJR 1997;168:539-42.
9. Lu ZF, Nickoloff EL, So JC, et al. Comparison of computed radiography and film/screen combination using a contrast-detail phantom. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2003;4:91-8.