Screen-film versus computed radiography imaging of the hand: A direct comparison

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 168, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 539-542

  Swee, Ronald G ^a   Gray, Joel E ^a   Beabout, John W ^a   McLeod, Richard A ^a   Cooper, Kay L ^a   Bond, Jeffrey R ^a   Wenger, Doris E ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; FILM; HAND RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOGRAPHY; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS;

EID: 0031033942     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.168.2.9016243     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Murphey MD, Quale JL, Martin NL, Bramble JM, Cook LT, Dwyer SJ. Computer radiography in musculoskeletal imaging: state of the art. AJR 1992;158:19-27
2. Wilson AJ, Mann FA, Murphy WA, Monsees BS, Linn MR. Photostimulable phosphor digital radiography of the extremities: diagnostic accuracy compared with conventional radiography. AJR 1991;157:533-538
3. Swensen SJ, Gray JE, Brown LR, et al. A new asymmetric screen-film combination for conventional chest radiography: evaluation in 50 patients. AJR 1993;160:483-486
4. Holmes DR Jr, Wondrow MA, Reeder GS, et al. Optimal display of the coronary arterial tree with an upscan 1,023-line video display system. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1989;18:175-180
5. Holmes DR Jr, Smith HC, Jr., Gray JE, et al. Clinical evaluation and application of cardiac laboratory high-definition video systems. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1984;10:63-71