Causal reasoning as a base for advancing a systemic approach to simple electrical circuits

Research in Science Education

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 445-459

  Barbas, A ^a   Psillos, D ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2642543017     PISSN: 0157244X     EISSN: 15731898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02461764     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Andersson, B. (1986). The experimental gestalt of, causation: A common core to pupil's preconceptions in science. European Journal of Science Education, 5(2), 155-171.
2. Barbas, A., & Psillos, D. (1993). Designing a computer-based course on basic electricity for prospective primary school teachers. In P. L. Lijnse (Ed.), European Research in Science Education. Proceedings of the first PhD Summerschool (pp. 215-223). Utrecht: Cd-ß Press.
3. Barbas, A., Koumaras, P., & Psillos, D. (1995, April). A causal approach for relating equilibrium to change in electrical circuits. Paper presented at the European Conference on Research in Science Education, Leeds, UK.
4. Chabay, R. W., & Sherwood, B. A. (1995). Electric and magnetic interactions. New York: John Wiley.
5. Cheng, P., & Holyoak, K. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 391-416.
6. Sessa, A. (1979). On "learnable" representations of knowledge: A meaning for the computational metaphor. In J. Lochhead & J. Clement (Eds), Cognitive process instruction (pp. 239-266). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: The Franklin Institute Press.
7. Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (Eds.). (1994). Making sense of secondary science. London: Routledge.
8. Eylon, B.-S., & Ganiel, U. (1990). Macro-micro relationships: The missing link between electrostatics and electrodynamics in students' reasoning. International journal of Science Education, 12(1), 79-94.
9. Frederiksen, J. R., & White, B. Y. (1992). Mental models and understanding: A problem for science education. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds), New directions in educational technology (pp. 211-226). (NATO ASI Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences, Vol. 96). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
10. Gutierrez, R., & Ogborn, J. (1992). A causal framework for analysing alternative conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 14(2), 201-220.
11. Gutwill, J., Frederiksen J., & Ranney M. (1996). Seeking the causal connection in electricity: Shifting among mechanistic perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 18(2), 143-162.
12. Halbwachs, F. (1971 a). Réflexions sur la causalité physique [Reflections on causality in physics]. In M. Bunge, F. Halbwachs, T. S. Kuhn, J. Piaget, & L. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Les théories de la causalité (pp. 19-38). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
13. Halbwachs, F. (1971b). Causalité linéaire et causalité circulaire en physique [Linear causality and circular causality in physics]. In M. Bunge, F. Halbwachs, T. S. Kuhn, J. Piaget, & L. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Les théories de la causalité (pp. 39-111). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
14. Koumaras, P., Kariotoglou, P., & Psillos, D. (1997). Causal structures and counter-intuitive experiments in electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 19(6), 617-630.
15. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
16. Lijnse, P. L. (1995). Trends in European research. In D. Psillos (Ed.), Proceedings of the second PhD Summerschool on European Research in Science Education (pp. 15-25). Thessaloniki: Art of Text.
17. Lijnse, P. L., Licht, P., De Vos, W., & Waarlo, A. J. (Eds.). (1990). Relating macroscopic phenomena to microscopic particles. Utrecht: CD-ß Press.
18. Meheut, M. (1997). Designing a learning sequence about a prequantitative kinetic model of gases: The parts played by questions and by a computer-simulation. International Journal of Science Education, 19(6), 647-660.
19. Psillos, D. (1995). Adapting instruction to students' reasoning. In D. Psillos (Ed.), Proceedings of the second PhD Summerschool on European Research in Science Education (pp. 57-71). Thessaloniki: Art of Text.
20. Psillos, D. (in press). Teaching introductory electricity. In A. Tiberghien & B. Jossm (Eds.), Research and teacher education. International Commission for the Physics Education.
21. Psillos, D., & Barbas, A. (1995, March). Critical analysis of a science textbook as a framework for developing pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented at the UNESCO workshop Pedagogical Research and Elaboration of Textbooks for Primary Education, Thessaloniki, Greece.
22. Psillos, D., Koumaras, P., & Valassiades, O. (1987). Students' representations of electric current before, during and after instruction on DC circuits. Journal of Research in Science and Technological Education, 5(2), 185-189.
23. Rainson, S., Tranströmer, G., & Viennot L. (1994). Students' understanding of superposition of electric fields. American Journal of Physics, 62(11), 1026-1032.
24. Rozier, S., & Viennot, L. (1991). Students' reasoning in thermodynamics. International Journal of Science Education, 13(2), 159-170.
25. Sherwood, B. A., & Chabay, R. W. (1993). Electrical interactions and the atomic structure of matter: Adding qualitative reasoning to a calculus-based electricity and magnetism course. In M. Caillot (Ed.), Learning electricity and electronics with advanced educational technology (pp. 23-35) (NATO ASI Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences, Vol. 115). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
26. Shipstone, D. M., von Rhöneck, C, Jung, W., Kärrqvist, C., Dupin, J. J., Joshua, S., & Licht, P. (1988). A study of students' understanding of electricity in five European countries. International Journal in Science Education, 70(3), 303-316.
27. Steinberg, M. (1987). Transient electrical processes as resources for causal reasoning. In J. D. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Seminar Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science & Mathematics (pp. 480 - 489). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
28. Tallant, D. P. (1993). A review of misconceptions of electricity and electrical circuits. In J. D. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Ithaca, NY. (http://www2.ucsc.edu.mlrg/proc3abstracts.html)
29. Tiberghien, A. (1994). Modelling as a basis for analysing teaching-learning situations. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 71-87.
30. Viennot, L. (1996). Raisonner en Physique: Le part du sens commun [Reasoning in Physics: The part of common sense]. Bruxelles: De Boeck Université, Pratiques Pédagogiques.
31. Viennot, L., & Rainson, S. (1992). Students' reasoning about the superposition of electric fields. International Journal of Science Education, 14(4), 475-487.
32. White, B. Y., Frederiksen, J. R., & Spoehr, K. T. (1993). Conceptual models for understanding electrical circuits. In M. Caillot (Ed.), Learning electricity or electronics with advanced educational technology (pp. 77-95). (NATO ASI Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences, Vol. 115). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.