Evaluating web-based project information management in construction: Capturing the long-term value creation process

Automation in Construction

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 469-479

  Stewart, Rodney A ^a   Mohamed, Sherif ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Construction projects; Information exchange; Information technology; Performance measurement

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; CORRELATION METHODS; COSTS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INVESTMENTS; PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; WORLD WIDE WEB;

CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; INFORMATION EXCHANGE; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT); PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 2642541838     PISSN: 09265805     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2004.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Deng Z.M., Li H., Tam C.M., Shen Q.P., Love P.E.D. An application of internet-based project management system. Automation in Construction. 10:2001;239-246.
2. Flanagan R., Ingram I., Marsh L. A Bridge to the Future: Profitable Construction for Tomorrow's Industry and its Customers. 1998;Thomas Telford, Springfield.
3. Baldwin A.N., Thorpe A., Carter C. The use of electronic information exchange on construction alliance projects. Automation in Construction. 8:1999;651-662.
4. Walker D.H.T., Hampson K.D. Procurement Strategies: A Relationship Based Approach. 2003;Blackwell, Oxford.
5. Hannus M., Watson A., Luiten B., Deguine M., Sauce G., Van Rijn T. ICT tools for improving the competitiveness of the LSE Industry. Journal of Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 6:1999;30-37.
6. Betts M. Strategic Management of IT in Construction. 1999;Blackwell, Oxford.
7. Pena-Mora F., Vadhavkar S., Perkins E., Weber T. Information technology planning framework for large-scale projects. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. 1999 (October);226-237.
8. Irani Z., Love P.E.D. The propagation of technology management taxonomies for evaluating investments in information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems. 17:2001;161-177.
9. Powell P.L. Information technology evaluation: is IT different? Journal of the Operational Research Society. 43:1992;29-42.
10. Kumar R. Understanding the value of information technology enabled responsiveness. Electronic Journal of Information System Evaluation. 1:2000.
11. Dos Santos B.L., Sussman L. Improving the return on IT investment: the productivity paradox. International Journal of Information Management. 20:2000;429-440.
12. Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P. The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review. 1992 (January-February);71-80.
13. Willcocks L. Investing in Information Systems: Evaluation and Management. 1996;Chapman & Hall, London.
14. Strassmann P.A. The Squandered Computer: Evaluating the Business Alignment of Information Technologies. 1997;The Information Economics Press, Connecticut.
15. Ballantine J., Stray S. Financial appraisal and the ICT investment decision making process. Journal of Information Technology. 14:1998;3-15.
16. Fitzgerald G. Evaluating information systems projects: a multi-dimensional approach. Journal of Information Technology. 14:1998;17-30.
17. K. Milis, R. Mercken, The use of the balanced scorecard for the evaluation of information and communciation technology projects, International Journal of Project Management, 22 87-97.
18. Stewart R.A., Mohamed S. Utilizing the balanced scorecard for IT/IS performance evaluation in construction. Journal of Construction Innovation. 1:2001;147-163.
19. Mohamed S., Stewart R.A. An empirical investigation of users' perceptions of web-based communication on a construction project. Automation in Construction. 12:2003;43-53.
20. Stewart R.A., Mohamed S. Evaluating the value IT adds to the process of project information management in construction. Automation in Construction. 12:2003;407-417.
21. Jung Y., Gibson G.E. Planning for computer integrated construction. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. 13:1999;217-225.
22. Andresen J., Baldwin A., Betts M., Carter C., Hamilton A., Stokes E., Thorpe T. A framework for measuring IT innovation benefits. Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction. 5:2000;57-72. ( www.itcon.org ).
23. Marsh L., Flanagan R. Measuring the costs and benefits of information technology in construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 7:2000;423-435.
24. Hampson K.D., Peters R.J., Walker D.H.T., Tucker S.N., Mohamed S., Ambrose M., Johnston D. Case Study of the Acton Peninsula Development, Government Research Report. 2001;Dept. of Industry, Science and Resources, Commonwealth of Australia Government, Canberra.
25. Duyshart B., Mohamed S., Hampson K.D., Walker D.H.T. Enabling improved business relationships - how information technology makes a difference. Walker D.H.T., Hampson K.D. Procurement Strategies: A Relationship Based Approach. 2003;123-166 Blackwell, Oxford. Chap. 6.
26. Sim K.L., Koh H.C. Balanced scorecard: a rising trend in strategic performance measurement. Measuring Business Excellence. 5:2001;18-26.
27. Fellows R., Liu A. Research Methods for Construction. 1997;Blackwell, Australia.
28. Kaplan R., Norton D. Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System. vol. 74:1996;Harvard Business School, Boston. 75 pp.