Evaluating the value IT adds to the process of project information management in construction

Automation in Construction

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 407-417

  Stewart, Rodney A ^a   Mohamed, Sherif ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Balanced scorecard; Construction projects; Information management; Information technology; Performance measurement

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTION; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; SURVEYS;

BALANCED SCORECARD (BSC);

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0038823674     PISSN: 09265805     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0926-5805(03)00006-2     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. M. Betts, M. Shafagi, A Health Check of the Strategic Exploitation of IT: An Industry Study, Construct IT Centre of Excellence, University of Salford, 1997.
2. B.L. Atkin, J.V.L. Gravett, Benchmarking Best Practice Report: Integrated Project Information, Summary Report for the Construct IT Centre, Salford, 1999.
3. Pena-Mora F., Vadhavkar S., Perkins E., Weber T. Information technology planning framework for large-scale projects. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering (ASCE). 1999 (October);226-237.
4. Irani Z., Love P.E.D. The propagation of technology management taxonomies for evaluating investments in information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems. 17(3):2001;161-177.
5. Stewart R.A., Mohamed S. Utilizing the balanced scorecard for IT/IS performance evaluation in construction. Journal of Construction Innovation. 1(3):2001;147-163.
6. K.D. Hampson, R.J. Peters, D.H.T. Walker, S.N. Tucker, S. Mohamed, M. Ambrose, D. Johnston, Case Study of the Acton Peninsula Development, Government Research Report, Dept of Industry, Science and Resources, Commonwealth of Australia Government, Canberra, 2001.
7. Mohamed S., Stewart R.A. An empirical investigation of users' perceptions of web-based communication on a construction project. Automation in Construction. 12(1):2003;43-53.
8. Powell P.L. Information technology evaluation: is IT different? Journal of Operational Research Society. 43:1992;29-42.
9. Kumar R. Understanding the value of information technology enabled responsiveness. Electronic Journal of Information System Evaluation. 1:2000.
10. Dos Santos B.L., Sussman L. Improving the return on IT investment: the productivity paradox. International Journal of Information Management. 20:2000;429-440.
11. Ballantine J., Bonner M., Levy M., Martin A. The 3-D model of information systems success: the search for the dependant variable continues. Information Resources Management Journal. 9(4):1996;5-14.
12. Parker M. Strategic Transformation and Information Technology. 1996;Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, USA.
13. Saarinen T. An expanded instrument for evaluating information system success. Information and Management. 31(2):1996;103-118.
14. Ballantine J., Stray S. Information systems and other capital investments: evaluation practice compared. Logistics and Information Management. 12(1-2):1999;78-93.
15. Betts M. Strategic Management of IT in Construction. 1999;Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
16. Serafeimedis V., Smithson S. Information systems evaluation in practice: a case study of organisational change. Journal of Information Technology. 15(2):2000;93-106.
17. Kagioglou M., Cooper R., Aouad G. Performance management in construction: a conceptual framework. Construction Management and Economics. 19:2001;85-95.
18. Fellows R., Liu A. Research Methods for Construction. 1997;Blackwell Science, Australia.
19. Hair J.F., Anderson J.F., Tatham R.L. Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th ed. 1998;Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, USA.
20. Kaplan R.M., Saccuzzo D.P. Psychological Testing: Principles, Applications and Issues. 1993;Brooks/Cole, California, USA.