Polygenic inheritance is not necessary for sympatric speciation by sexual selection

Population Ecology

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 87-91

  Takimoto, G ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Major gene inheritance; Premating reproductive isolation; Runaway process; Simulation

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); SYMPATRY;

MARTES PENNANTI;

EID: 0036699364     PISSN: 14383896     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s101440200010     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Albertson RC, Markert JA, Danley PD, Kocher TD (1999) Phylogeny of a rapidly evolving clade: the cichlid fishes of Lake Malawi, East Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5107-5110
2. Deutsch JC (1997) Color diversification in Malawi cichlids: evidence for adaptation, reinforcement or sexual selection? Biol J Linn Soc 62:1-14
3. Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon, Oxford
4. Gavrilets S (2000) Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict. Nature (Lond) 403:886-889
5. Gavrilets S, Waxman D (2002) Sympatric speciation by sexual conflict. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:10533-10538
6. Hayashi T, Kawata M (2001) Evolution of postmating isolation: comparison of three models based on possible genetic mechanisms. Popul Ecol 43:179-188
7. Higashi M, Takimoto G, Yamamura N (1999) Sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Nature (Lond) 402:523-526
8. Hoikkala A, Lumme J (1987) The genetic basis of the evolution of the male courtship sounds of the Drosophila virilis group. Evolution 41:827-845
9. Iwasa Y, Pomiankowski A (1995) Continual change in mate preferences. Nature (Lond) 377:420-422
10. Kawata M, Yoshimura J (2000) Speciation by sexual selection in hybridizing populations without viability selection. Evol Ecol Res 2:897-909
11. Lande R (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:3721-3725
12. Lande R (1982) Rapid origin of sexual isolation and character divergence in a cline. Evolution 36:213-223
13. Lande R, Seehausen O, van Alphen JJM (2001) Mechanisms of rapid sympatric speciation by sex reversal and sexual selection in cichlid fish. Genetica (Dordr) 112:435-443
14. Nei M, Maruyama T, Wu C-I (1983) Models of evolution of reproductive isolation. Genetics 103:557-579
15. Ohta T, Kimura M (1973) A model of mutation appropriate to estimate the number of electrophoretically detectable alleles in a finite population. Genet Res 22:201-204
16. Pomiankowski A, Iwasa Y, Nee S (1991) The evolution of costly mate preferences. I. Fisher and biased mutation. Evolution 45:1422-1430
17. Ritchie MG, Phillips SDF (1998) The genetics of sexual isolation. In: Howard D J, Berlocher SH (eds) Endless forms. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 291-308
18. Seehausen O, van Alphen JM (1999) Can sympatric speciation by disruptive sexual selection explain rapid evolution of cichlid diversity in Lake Victoria? Ecol Lett 2:262-271
19. Seehausen O, van Alphen JJM, Witte F (1997) Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science 277:1808-1811
20. Takahashi A, Tsaur S-C, Coyne JA, Wu C-I (2001) The nucleotide changes governing cuticular hydrocarbon variation and their evolution in Drosophila melanogaster, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:3920-3925
21. Takimoto G, Higashi M, Yamamura N (2000) A deterministic genetic model for sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Evolution 54:1870-1881
22. Turelli M, Barton NH, Coyne JA (2001) Theory and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 16:330-343
23. Turner GF (1994) Speciation mechanism in Lake Malawi cichlid: a critical review. Arch Hydrobiol 44:139-160
24. Turner GF, Burrows MT (1995) A model of sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 260:287-292
25. Wu C-I (1985) A stochastic simulation study on speciation by sexual selection. Evolution 39:66-82