A simulation study of supply chain management to measure the impact of information sharing

Information Resources Management Journal

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 20-31

  Huang, Zhensen ^a   Gangopadhyay, Aryya ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

^b University of Marylandw Baltimore County   (United States)

Author keywords

Information sharing; Simulation study; Supply chain management

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; COSTS; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

INFORMATION SHARING; SIMULATION STUDY; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; SUPPLY NETWORKS;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 2642526884     PISSN: 10401628     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/irmj.2004070102     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Anumba, C.J., Siemieniuch, C.E., & Sinclair, M.A. (2000). Supply chain implications of concurrent engineering. International Journal of Physical and Logistics Management, 7, 566-597.
2. Axsater, S. (2000). Inventory control. Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3. Bagahna, M.P., & Cohen, M.A. (1998). The stabilizing effect of inventory in supply chains. Operations Research, 46(3), 72-83.
4. Bourland, K., Powell, S., & Pyke, D. (1996). Exploring timely demand information to reduce inventories. European Journal of Operation Research, 92, 239-253.
5. Cachon, G.P., & Fisher, M. (1999). Supply chain inventory management and the value of shared information. Working paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
6. Callioni, G., & Billington, C. (2001). Effective collaboration. Operational Research/Management Science Today, 28, 34-39.
7. Chen, F. (1999). Decentralized supply chains subject to information delays. Management Science, 45(8), 1076-1090.
8. Chen, F., Drezner, Z., Ryan, J.K., & Simchi-Levi, D. (2000). Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: The impact of forecasting, lead times, and information. Management Science, 46(3), 436-443.
9. Davis, R. (1988). Industrial insights on the DoD concurrent engineering program. Rosslyn, VA: The Pymatuning Group.
10. Dong, L., & Lee, H.L. (2003). Efficient supply chain structures for personal computers. In J.-S. Song & D. Yao (Eds.), Supply chain structures, coordination, information and optimization. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Forgionne, G.A. (1993). IMDS: A knowledge-based system to support concurrent engineering at Westinghouse. Expert Systems with Applications, 6, 193-202.
12. Forgionne, G.A. (1994). A decision technology system to deliver effective concurrent engineering. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 2, 67-76.
13. Forgionne, G.A., & Kohli, R. (1993). Enhanced health care decision support systems. Proceedings of the National Decision Sciences Institute Conference.
14. Forrest J.W. (1958). Industrial dynamics. Harvard Business Review, (July-August), 37-66.
15. Gal-Or, E. (1985). Information sharing in oligopoly. Econometrica, 53, 329-344.
16. Gao, L.L., & Robinson, E.P. (1994). An arborescent network formulation and dual ascent based procedure for the two-stage multi-item dynamic demand lotzide problem, Decision Sciences, 25(1), 103-121.
17. Gavirneni, S. (2002). Information flows in capacitated supply chains with fixed ordering costs. Management Science, 48(5), 644-651.
18. Graves, S.C. (1996). A multiechelon inventory model with fixed replenishment intervals. Management Science, 42(1), 1-18.
19. Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., & Tittiroglu, E. (2001). Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21, 71-87.
20. Gupta, U.G. (1997). Using citation analysis to explore the intellectual base, knowledge dissemination, and research impact of interfaces (1970-1992). Interfaces, 27, 85-101.
21. Gupta, J.N.D., Marques, A.C., & Bianchi, C. (2001). Supply chain integration through e-collaboration tools. Working paper, Ball State University.
22. Handfield, R.B., & Nichols, E.L. (2002). Supply chain redesign: Transforming supply chain into integrated value systems. Financial Times. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23. Hoover, S.V., & Perry, R.F. (1990). Simulation: A problem-solving approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
24. Kleijnen, J.P.C., & van Groenendaal, W. (1992). Simulation: A statistical perspective. Chichester, England.
25. Kleijnen, J.P.C., & Smits, M.T. (2003). Performance metrics in supply chain management. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 11(11), 1-8.
26. Kirby, A. (1988). Trade associations as information exchange mechanisms. Rand Journal of Economics, 19(1), 138-146.
27. Kohli, R., & Forgionne, G.A. (1992). Applying concurrent engineering concepts to clinical information systems. Healthcare Information Management, 6(4), 13-16.
28. Lane, M.S., Mansour, A.H., & Harpell, J.L. (1993). Operations research techniques: A longitudinal update 1973-1988. Interfaces, 23, 63-68.
29. Lankford, W.M., & Riggs, W.E. (1996). Electronic data interchange: Where are we today? Journal of Systems Management, (March/April), 58-62.
30. rd edition). City: McGraw-Hill.
31. Lee, H., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. (1997a). The bullwhip effect in supply chains. Sloan Management Review, 38(3), 93-102.
32. Lee, H., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang S. (1997b). Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Science, 43(4), 546-558.
33. Lee, H., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang S. (1999). Decentralized multi-echelon supply chain: Incentives and information. Management Science, 45(5), 633-640.
34. Lee, H., & Whang, W. (2000). Information sharing in a supply chain. International Journal of Technology Management, 20(3/4), 373-387.
35. Lee, H., So, K.C., & Tang, C.S. (2000). The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Management Science, 46(5), 626-643.
36. Li, L. (1985). Cournot oligopoly with information sharing. Rand Journal of Economics, 16, 521-536.
37. Liker, J.K., & Wu, Y. (2000). Japanese automakers. U.S. suppliers and supply-chain superiority. Sloan Management Review, 42, 81-93.
38. McHaney, R. (1991). Computer simulation: A practical perspective. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
39. Miao, Y., & Haake, J.M. (1998). Supporting concurrent design by integrating information sharing and activity synchronization. Proceedings of the 5th ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications (CE98) (pp. 165-174), Tokyo, Japan.
40. Raghunathan, S. (1999). Interorganizational collaborative forecasting and replenishment systems and supply chain implications. Decision Sciences, 30(4), 1053-1071.
41. Sahin, F., & Robinson, E.P. (2002). Flow coordination and information sharing in supply chains: Review, implications, and directions for future research. Decision Sciences, 33(4), 505-536.
42. Sargent, R.G. (1998). A tutorial on validation and verification of simulation models. Proceedings of the 1988 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 33-39), San Diego, California, December 12-14.
43. nd edition). New York: Springer-Verlag.
44. Shim, J.K., & Siegel, J.G. (1999). Operations management. Hauppauge, NY: Barron's Educational Series.
45. Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi-Levi, E. (2000). Designing and managing the supply chain: Concepts, strategies, and case studies. Boston, MA: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
46. Silver, E.A., Pyke, D.F., & Peterson, R. (1998). Inventory management and production planning and scheduling. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
47. Song, J.-S., & Yao, D. (2003). Supply chain structures, coordination, information and optimization. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
48. Sterman, initial, & Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.
49. Swaminathan, J.M., Smith, S.F., & Sadeh, N.M. (1998). Modeling supply chain dynamics: A multiagent approach. Decision Sciences, 29(3), 607-632.
50. Whang, S. (1993). Analysis of interorganizational information sharing. Journal of Organization Computing, 3(3), 257-277.