Genetic linkage between a sexually selected trait and X chromosome meiotic drive

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 272, Issue 1576, 2005, Pages 2097-2103

  Johns, Philip M ^a   Wolfenbarger, L LaReesa ^b   Wilkinson, Gerald S ^a  

^a Bldg 142   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni; Mate choice; Meiotic drive; Sex ratio

Indexed keywords

GENETICS;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FLY; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPE; MALE; MEIOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SEX RATIO; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPERMATID; X CHROMOSOME;

CYRTODIOPSIS DALMANNI; DIOPSIDAE;

EID: 26244448545     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3183     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Andersson, M. 1986 Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40, 804-816.
2. Andersson, M. 1994 Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Atlan, A., Mercot, H., Landre, C. & Montchamp-Moreau, C. 1997 The sex-ratio trait in Drosophila simulans: Geographical distribution of distortion and resistance. Evolution 51, 1886-1895.
4. Atlan, A., Capillon, C., Derome, N., Couvet, D. & Montchamp-Moreau, C. 2003 The evolution of autosomal suppressors of sex-ratio drive in Drosophila simulans. Genetica 117, 47-58. (doi:10.1023/A:1022312615773.)
5. Babcock, C. S. & Anderson, W. W. 1996 Molecular evolution of the sex-ratio inversion complex in Drosophila pseudoobscura: analysis of the esterase-5 gene region. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13, 297-308.
6. Baker, R. H. & Wilkinson, G. S. 2001 Phylogenetic analysis of eye stalk allometry and sexual dimorphism in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Evolution 55, 1373-1385.
7. Baker, R. H. & Wilkinson, G. S. 2003 Phylogenetic analysis of correlation structure in stalk-eyed flies (Diasemopsis Diopsidae). Evolution 57, 87-103.
8. Burkhardt, D. & de la Motte, I. 1985 Selective pressures, variability, and sexual dimorphism in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Naturwissenschaften 72, 204-206. (doi:10.1007/BF01195763.)
9. Burkhardt, D. & de la Motte, I. 1988 Big 'antlers' are favoured: female choice in stalk-eyed flies (Diptera Insecta), field collected harems and laboratory experiments. J. Comp. Physiol. A 162, 649-652. (doi:10.1007/ BF01342640.)
10. Cazemajor, M., Joly, D. & Montchamp-Moreau, C. 2000 Sex-ratio meiotic drive in Drosophila simulans is related to equational nondisjunction of the Y chromosome. Genetics 154, 229-236.
11. Charlesworth, B. 1987 The heritability of fitness. In Sexual selection: testing the alternatives (ed. J. W. Bradbury & M. B. Andersson), pp. 21-40. Chichester: Wiley.
12. David, P., Bjorksten, T., Fowler, K. & Pomiankowski, A. 2000 Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies. Nature 406, 186-188. (doi:10.1038/35018079.)
13. de Carvalho, A. B., Vaz, S. C. & Klaczko, L. B. 1997 Polymorphism for Y-linked suppressors of sex-ratio in two natural populations of Drosophila mediopunctata. Genetics 146, 891-902.
14. Doerge, R. W. & Churchill, G. A. 1996 Permutation tests for multiple loci affecting a quantitative character. Genetics 142, 285-294.
15. Grafen, A. 1990 Biological signals as handicaps. J. Theor. Biol. 144.
16. Haig, D. & Grafen, A. 1991 Genetic scrambling as a defence against meiotic drive. J. Theor. Biol. 153, 531-558.
17. Hamilton, W. D. 1967 Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156, 477-488.
18. Hamilton, W. D. & Zuk, M. 1982 Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218, 384-387.
19. Hingle, A., Fowler, K. & Pomiankowski, A. 2001 Size-dependent mate preference in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Anim. Behav. 61, 589-595. (doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1613.)
20. Iwasa, Y., Pomiankowski, A. & Nee, S. 1991 The evolution of costly mate preferences. II. The "handicap" principle. Evolution 45, 1431-1442.
21. Jaenike, J. 1999 "Sex-ratio" meiotic drive and the maintenance of Y chromosome polymorphism in Drosophila. Evolution 53, 164-174.
22. Jaenike, J. 2001 Sex chromosome meiotic drive. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32, 25-49. (doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.113958.)
23. Jutier, D., Derome, N. & Montchamp-Moreau, C. 2004 The sex-ratio trait and its evolution in Drosophila simulans: a comparative approach. Genetica 120, 87-99. (doi:10.1023/B:GENE.0000017633.01507.a3.)
24. Lande, R. & Wilkinson, G. S. 1999 Models of sex-ratio meiotic drive and sexual selection in stalk-eyed flies. Genet. Res. 74, 245-253. (doi:10.1017/S0016672399004218.)
25. Lenington, S., Coopersmith, C. B. & Erhart, M. 1994 Female preference and variability among t-haplotypes in wild house mice. Am. Nat. 143, 766-784. (doi:10.1086/285632.)
26. Lenormand, T. 2003 The evolution of sex dimorphism in recombination. Genetics 163, 811-822.
27. Manly, K., Cudmore Jr, R. H. & Meer, J. 2001 Map Manager QTX, cross platform software for genetic mapping. Mamm. Genome 12, 930-932. (doi:10.1007/s00335-001-1016-3.)
28. Møller, A. P. & Alatalo, R. V. 1999 Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. B 266, 85-91. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0607.)
29. Moreau, J., Bertin, A., Caubet, Y. & Rigaud, T. 2001 Sexual selection in an isopod with Wolbachia-induced sex reversal: males prefer real females. J. Evol. Biol. 14, 388-394. (doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00292.x.)
30. Panhuis, T. M. & Wilkinson, G. S. 1999 Exaggerated male eye span influences contest outcome in stalk-eyed flies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46, 221-227. (doi:10.1007/s002650050613.)
31. Pomiankowski, A. 1987 Sexual selection: the handicap principle does work-sometimes. Proc. R. Soc. B 231, 123-145.
32. Pomiankowski, A. 1988 The evolution of female mate preferences for male genetic quality. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 5, 136-184.
33. Presgraves, D. C., Severence, E. & Wilkinson, G. S. 1997 Sex chromosome meiotic drive in stalk-eyed flies. Genetics 147, 1169-1180.
34. Randerson, J. P., Jiggins, F. M. & Hurst, L. D. 2000 Male killing can select for male mate choice: a novel solution to the paradox of the lek. Proc. R. Soc. B 267, 867-874. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1083.)
35. Reinhold, K., Engqvist, L., Misof, B. & Kurtz, J. 1999 Meiotic drive and the evolution of female choice. Proc. R. Soc. B 226, 1341-1346.
36. Sakaluk, S. K. & O'Day, D. H. 1984 Hoechst staining and quantification of sperm in the spermatophore and spermathecae of the decorated cricket, Gryllodes supplicans (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Can. Entomol. 116, 1585-1589.
37. Sambrook, J. & Russell, D. W. 2001 Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
38. Stalker, H. D. 1961 The genetic systems modifying meiotic drive in Drosophila paramelanica. Genetics 46, 177-202.
39. Van Ooijen, J. W. & Voorrips, R. E. 2001 JoinMap 3.0, Software for the calculation of linkage maps. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Plant Research International.
40. Walling, G. A., Visscher, P. M. & Haley, C. S. 1998 A comparison of bootstrap methods to construct confidence intervals in QTL mapping. Genet. Res. 71, 171-180. (doi:10.1017/S0016672398003164.)
41. Wilkinson, G. S. 1993 Artificial sexual selection alters allometry in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni (Diptera: Diopsidae). Genet. Res. 62, 213-222.
42. Wilkinson, G. S. & Dodson, G. 1997 Function and evolution of antlers and eye stalks in flies. In The evolution of mating systems in insects and arachnids (ed. J. Choe & B. Crespi), pp. 310-328. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43. Wilkinson, G. S. & Reillo, P. R. 1994 Female preference response to artificial selection on an exaggerated male trait in a stalk-eyed fly. Proc. R. Soc. B 255, 1-6.
44. Wilkinson, G. S. & Sanchez, M. I. 2001 Sperm development, age and sex chromosome meiotic drive in the stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis whitei. Heredity 87, 17-24. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00898.x.)
45. Wilkinson, G. S. & Taper, M. 1999 Evolution of genetic variation for condition dependent traits in stalk-eyed flies. Proc. R. Soc. B 266, 1685-1690. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0832.)
46. Wilkinson, G. S., Kahler, H. & Baker, R. H. 1998a Evolution of female mating preferences in stalk-eyed flies. Behav. Ecol. 9, 525-533.
47. Wilkinson, G. S., Presgraves, D. C. & Crymes, L. 1998b Male eye span in stalk-eyed flies indicates genetic quality by meiotic drive suppresion. Nature 391, 276-278. (doi:10.1038/34640.)
48. Wilkinson, G. S., Swallow, J. G., Christianson, S. J. & Madden, K. 2003 Phylogeography of sex ratio and multiple mating in stalk-eyed flies from southeast Asia. Genetica 117, 37-46. (doi:10.1023/A:1022360531703.)
49. Wilkinson, G. S., Amitin, E. G. & Johns, P. M. 2005 Sex-linked correlated responses in female reproductive traits to selection on male eye span in stalk-eyed flies. Int. Comp. Biol. 45, 114-124.
50. Wolfenbarger, L. L. & Wilkinson, G. S. 2001 Sex-linked expression of a sexually selected trait in the stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Evolution 55, 103-110.
51. Wright, T. F., Johns, P. M., Walters, J. P., Lerner, A. P., Swallow, J. G. & Wilkinson, G. S. 2004 Microsatellite variation among divergent populations of stalk-eyed flies, genus Cyrtodiopsis. Genet. Res. 84, 27-40. (doi:10.1017/S0016672304006986.)
52. Zeng, Z. 1994 Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 136, 1457-1468.