Sex-linked correlated responses in female reproductive traits to selection on male eye span in stalk-eyed flies

Integrative and Comparative Biology

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 500-510

  Wilkinson, Gerald S ^a   Amitin, Emily G ^a   Johns, Philip M ^a  

^a Bldg 142   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYRTODIOPSIS DALMANNI; DIOPSIDAE;

EID: 22844438418     PISSN: 15407063     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icb/45.3.500     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (73)

1. Baker, R. H., R. I. S. Ashwell, T. A. Richards, K. Fowler, T. Chapman, and A. Pomiankowski. 2001. Effects of multiple mating and male eye span on female reproductive output in the stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Behav. Ecol. 12:732-739.
2. Baker, R. H. and G. S. Wilkinson. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of eye stalk allometry and sexual dimorphism in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Evolution 55:1373-1385.
3. Bakker, T. C. M. 1993. Positive genetic correlation between female preference and preferred male ornament in sticklebacks. Nature 363:255-257.
4. Borgia, G. 1979. Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. In M. S. Blum, and N. A. Blum, (eds.), Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects, pp. 19-80. Academic Press, New York.
5. Briskie, J. V. and R. Montgomerie. 1993. Patterns of sperm storage in relation to sperm competition in passerine birds. Condor 95:442-454.
6. Briskie, J. V., R. Montgomerie, and T. R. Birkhead. 1997. The evolution of sperm size in birds. Evolution 51:937-945.
7. Buschbeck, E. K., J. L. Roosevelt, and R. R. Hoy. 2001. Eye stalks or no eye stalks: A structural comparison of pupal development in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis and in Drosophila. J. Comp. Neurol. 433:486-498.
8. Caceres, M., A. Barbadilla, and A. Ruiz. 1999. Recombination rate predicts inversion size in diptera. Genetics 153:251-259.
9. Charlesworth, B., J. A. Coyne, and N. H. Barton. 1987. The relative rates of evolution of sex chromosomes and autosomes. Am. Nat. 130:113-146.
10. Chippindale, A. K., J. R. Gibson, and W. R. Rice. 2001. Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:1671-1675.
11. Derome, N., K. Metayer, C. Montchamp-Moreau, and M. Veuille. 2004. Signature of selective sweep associated with evolution of sex-ratio drive in Drosophila simulans. Genetics 166:1357-1366.
12. Dubrovsky, E. B., V. A. Dubrovskaya, and E. M. Berger. 2002. Juvenile hormone signaling during oogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 32:1555-1565.
13. Dybas, L. K. and H. S. Dybas. 1981. Coadaptation and taxonomic differentiation of sperm and spermathecae in featherwing beetles. Evolution 35:168-174.
14. Eberhard, W. G. 1996. Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
15. Emlen, D. J. and H. F. Nijhout. 1999. Hormonal control of male horn length dimorphism in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). J. Insect Physiol. 45:45-53.
16. Emlen, D. J. and H. F. Nijhout. 2001. Hormonal control of male horn length dimorphism in Onthophagus taurus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): A second critical period of sensitivity to juvenile hormone. J. Insect Physiol. 47:1045-1054.
17. Fitzpatrick, M. J. 2004. Pleiotropy and the genomic location of sexually selected genes. Am. Nat. 163:800-808.
18. Fry, C. L. and G. S. Wilkinson. 2004. Sperm survival in female stalk-eyed flies depends on seminal fluid and meiotic drive. Evolution 58:1622-1626.
19. Gavrilets, S., G. Arnqvist, and U. Friberg. 2001. The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 268:531-539.
20. Gibson, J. R., A. K. Chippindale, and W. R. Rice. 2002. The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 269:499-505.
21. Grant, C. A., K. Fowler, and T. Chapman. 2002. No reduction of female sexual receptivity following mating in a stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis dalmani (Diptera: Diopsidae). J. Evol. Biol. 15:210-215.
22. Gray, D. A. and W. H. Cade. 2000. Sexual selection and speciation in field crickets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97:14449-14454.
23. Houde, A. E. 1994. Effect of artificial selection on male colour patterns on mating preference of female guppies. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 256:125-130.
24. Iwasa, Y., A. Pomiankowski, and S. Nee. 1991. The evolution of costly mate preferences. II. The "handicap" principle. Evolution 45:1431-1442.
25. Jaenike, J. 2001. Sex chromosome meiotic drive. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32:25-49.
26. Jiggins, F. M., G. D. D. Hurst, and M. E. N. Majerus. 1999. How common are meiotically driven sex chromosomes? Am. Nat. 154:481-483.
27. Joly, D., C. Bazin, L.-W. Zeng, and R. S. Singh. 1995. Genetic basis of sperm and testis length differences and epistatic effect on hybrid inviability and sperm motility between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Heredity 78:354-362.
28. Kirkpatrick, M. 1982. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36:1-12.
29. Kirkpatrick, M. and D. W. Hall. 2004. Sexual selection and sex linkage. Evolution 58:683-691.
30. Kotrba, M. 1990. Sperm transfer by spermatophore in an acalyptrate fly (Diptera: Diopsidae). Entomol. Gener. 15:181-183.
31. Kotrba, M. 1995. The internal female genital organs of Chaetodiopsis and Diasemopsis (Diptera: Diopsidae) and their systematic relevance. Ann. Natal Mus. 36:147-159.
32. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78:3721-3725.
33. Lande, R. and G. S. Wilkinson. 1999. Models of sex-ratio meiotic drive and sexual selection in stalk-eyed flies. Genet. Res. 74: 245-253.
34. Lindholm, A. and F. Breden. 2002. Sex chromosomes and sexual selection in poecilid fishes. Am. Nat. 160:S214-S224.
35. Miller, G. T. and S. Pitnick. 2002. Sperm-female coevolution in Drosophila. Science 298:1230-1233.
36. Morrow, E. H. and M. J. G. Gage. 2000. The evolution of sperm length in moths. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 267:307-313.
37. Morrow, E. H. and M. J. G. Gage. 2001. Artificial selection and heritability of sperm length in Gryllus bimaculatus. Heredity 87:1-7.
38. Navarro, A., E. Betran, A. Barbadilla, and A. Ruiz. 1997. Recombination and gene flux caused by gene conversion and crossing over in inversion heterokaryotypes. Genetics 146:695-709.
39. Palopoli, M. F. and C.-I. Wu. 1996. Rapid evolution of a coadapted gene complex: Evidence from the Segregation Distorter (SD) system of meiotic drive in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 143:1675-1688.
40. Panhuis, T. M. and G. S. Wilkinson. 1999. Exaggerated male eye span influences contest outcome in stalk-eyed flies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46:221-227.
41. Parisi, M., R. Nuttall, D. Naiman, G. Bouffard, J. Malley, J. Andrews, S. Eastman, and B. Oliver. 2003. Paucity of genes on the Drosophila X chromosome showing male-biased expression. Science 299:697-700.
42. Parker, G. A. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In M. S. Blum and N. B. Blum (eds.), Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects, pp. 123-166. Academic Press, New York.
43. Parker, G. A. and L. Partridge. 1998. Sexual conflict and speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 353:261-274.
44. Pitnick, S., T. Markow, and G. S. Spicer. 1999. Evolution of multiple kinds of female sperm-storage organs in Drosophila. Evolution 53:1804-1822.
45. Pitnick, S. and G. T. Miller. 2000. Correlated response in reproductive and life history traits to selection on testis length in Drosophila hydei. Heredity 84:416-426.
46. Pitnick, S., G. T. Miller, K. Schneider, and T. A. Markow. 2003. Ejaculate-female coevolution in Drosophila mojavensis. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 270:1507-1512.
47. Pomiankowski, A. 1987. Sexual selection: The handicap principle does work-sometimes. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 231:123-145.
48. Pomiankowski, A. and A. P. Møller. 1995. A resolution of the lek paradox. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 260:21-29.
49. Presgraves, D. C., R. H. Baker, and G. S. Wilkinson. 1999. Coevolution of sperm and female reproductive tract morphology in stalk-eyed flies. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 266:1041-1047.
50. Presgraves, D. C., E. Severence, and G. S. Wilkinson. 1997. Sex chromosome meiotic drive in stalk-eyed flies. Genetics 147:1169-1180.
51. Ranz, J. M., C. I. Castillo-Davis, C. D. Meiklejohn, and D. L. Hartl. 2003. Sex-dependent gene expression and evolution of the Drosophila transcriptome. Science 300:1742-1745.
52. Reguera, P., A. Pomiankowski, K. Fowler, and T. Chapman. 2004. Low cost of reproduction in female stalk-eyed flies, Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. J. Ins. Physiol. 50:103-108.
53. Reinhold, K. 1998. Sex linkage among genes controlling sexually selected traits. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 44:1-7.
54. Reinhold, K. 1999. Evolutionary genetics of sex-limited traits under fluctuating selection. J. Evol. Biol. 12:897-902.
55. Rice, W. R. 1984. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:735-742.
56. Rice, W. R. 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381:232-235.
57. Rice, W. R. and A. K. Chippindale. 2001. Intersexual ontogenetic conflict. J. Evol. Biol. 14:685-693.
58. Rowe, L. and D. Houle. 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition-dependent traits. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 263:1415-1421.
59. Saifi, G. M. and H. S. Chandra. 1999. An apparent excess of sex-and reproduction-related genes on the human X chromosome. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 266:203-209.
60. SAS_Institute. 2003. JMP. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
61. Simmons, L. W. and J. S. Kotiaho. 2002. Evolution of ejaculates: Patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation and condition dependence in sperm competition traits. Evolution 56:1622-1631.
62. Soller, M., M. Bownes, and E. Kubli. 1999. Control of oocyte maturation in sexually mature Drosophila females. Dev. Biol. 208:337-351.
63. Taylor, P. D. and G. C. Williams. 1982. The lek paradox is not resolved. Theor. Popul. Biol. 22:392-409.
64. Wang, P. J., J. R. McCarrey, F. Yang, and D. C. Page. 2001. An abundance of X-linked genes expressed in spermatogonia. Nat. Genet. 27:422-6.
65. Ward, P. I. 2000. Sperm length is heritable and sex-linked in yellow dung fly (Scatophaga stercoraria). J. Zool. 251:349-353.
66. Wilkinson, G. S. 1993. Artificial sexual selection alters allometry in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni (Diptera: Diopsidae). Genet. Res. 62:213-222.
67. Wilkinson, G. S., H. Kahler, and R. H. Baker. 1998a. Evolution of female mating preferences in stalk-eyed flies. Behav. Ecol. 9:525-533.
68. Wilkinson, G. S., D. C. Presgraves, and L. Crymes. 1998b. Male eye span in stalk-eyed flies indicates genetic quality by meiotic drive suppresion. Nature 391:276-278.
69. Wilkinson, G. S. and P. R. Reillo. 1994. Female preference response to artificial selection on an exaggerated male trait in a stalk-eyed fly. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 255:1-6.
70. Wilkinson, G. S. and M. I. Sanchez. 2001. Sperm development, age and sex chromosome meiotic drive in the stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis whitei. Heredity 87:17-24.
71. Wilkinson, G. S., J. G. Swallow, S. J. Christianson, and K. Madden. 2003. Phylogeography of sex ratio and multiple mating in stalk-eyed flies from southeast Asia. Genetica 117:37-46.
72. Wolfenbarger, L. L., and G. S. Wilkinson. 2001. Sex-linked expression of a sexually selected trait in the stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Evolution 55:103-110.
73. Wright, T. F., P. M. Johns, J. P. Walters, A. P. Lerner, J. G. Swallow, and G. S. Wilkinson. 2004. Microsatellite variation among divergent populations of stalk-eyed flies, genus Cyrtodiopsis. Genet. Res. 84:27-40.