Correlation between frequency doubling technology and Heidelberg retina tomograph

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 368-374

  Iester, Michele ^a,b,c   Traverso, Carlo E ^a   De Feo, Fabio ^a   Sanna, Giuseppe ^a   Altieri, Michele ^a   Vittone, Paolo ^b   Calabria, Giovanni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

^b G GASLINI INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Confocal scanning laser; Frequency doubling technology; Glaucoma; Heidelberg Retina Tomograph; Indices; Non conventional perimetry; Optic disc; Perimetry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FREQUENCY DOUBLING TECHNOLOGY; HEIDELBERG RETINA TOMOGRAPH; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA NERVE CELL; SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPE; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LASERS; NERVE FIBERS; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PERIMETRY; TOMOGRAPHY; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 25644459214     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000176937.93143.bf     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green R. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy papilledema and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100:135-146.
2. Pederson JE, Anderson DR. The mode of progressive disc cupping in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98:490-495.
3. Zeyen TG, Caprioli J. Progression of disc and field in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:62-65.
4. Chauhan BC, McCormick TA, Nicolela MT, et al. Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1492-1499.
5. Kamal DS, Viswanthan AC, Garway-Heath DF, et al. Detection of optic disc change with the HRT before confirmed visual field change in ocular hypertensives converting to early glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83: 290-294.
6. Quigley HA. Identification of glaucoma-related field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:819-829.
7. Sponsel WE, Arango S, Trigo Y, et al. Clinical classification of glaucomatous visual field loss by frequency doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:830-836.
8. Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38: 413-425.
9. White AJR, Sun H, Swanson WH, et al. An examination of physiological mechanism underlying the frequency-doubling illusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:3590-3599.
10. Iester M, Altieri M, Vittone P. et al. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defect by nonconventional perimetry. Am J Ophtalmol. 2003;135: 35-39.
11. European Glaucoma Society. Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma. 2nd ed. Savona: Dogma 2003;2:6-8.
12. Iester M, Swindale NV, Mikelberg FS. Sector-based analysis of optic nerve head shape parameters and visual field indices in healthy and glaucomatous eyes. J Glaucoma. 1997;6:371-376.
13. Caprioli J. The contour of the juxtapapillary nerve fiber layer in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1990;97:358-366.
14. Iester M, Mermoud A, Schnyder C. Frequency doubling technique in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107:288-294.
15. Johnson CA, Demirel S. The role of spatial and temporal factors in frequency-doubling perimetry. In: Wall M, Heijl A, eds. Perimetry Up-date 1996/'97. Amsterdam/New York: Kugler Publications; 1997:13-19.
16. Heijl A, Bengtsson B. The effect of perimetric experience in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:19-22.
17. Iester M, Capris P, Pandolfo A, et al. Learning effect, short term fluctuation and long-term fluctuation in frequency doubling technique. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130:160-164.
18. Matsuo H, Tomita G, Suzuki Y, et al. Learning effect and measurement variability in frequency-doubling technology perimetry in chronic open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:467-473.
19. Horani A, Frenkel S, Yahalom C, et al. The learning effect in visual field testing of healthy subjects using frequency doubling technology. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:511-516.
20. Dreher AW, Tso PC, Weinreb RN. Reproducibility of topographic measurements of the normal and glaucomatous nerve head with the laser tomographic scanner. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;111:221-229.
21. Kruse FE, Burk ROW, Völcker HE, et al. Reproducibility of topographic measurements of the optic nerve head with laser tomographic scanning. Ophthalmology. 1989;96:1320-1324.
22. Cioffi GA, Robin AL, Eastman RD, et al. Confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope: reproducibility of optic nerve head topographic measurements with the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:57-62.
23. Weinreb RN, Lusky M, Bartsch DU, et al. Effect of repetitive imaging on topographic measurements of the optic nerve head. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:636-638.
24. Mikelberg FS, Wijsman K, Schulzer M. Reproducibility of topographic parameters obtained with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. J Glaucoma. 1993;2:101-103.
25. Chauhan BC, LeBlanc RP, McCormick TA, et al. Test-retest variability of topographic measurements with confocal scanning laser tomography in patients with glaucoma and control subjects. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;118: 9-15.
26. Sample P, Weinreb RN. Progressive colour visual field loss in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:2068-2071.
27. Birt CM, Shin DH, McCarty B, et al. Comparison between high-pass resolution perimetry and differential light sensitivity perimetry in patients with glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 1998;7:111-116.
28. Iester M, Mikelberg FS, Courthright P, et al. Correlation between the visual field indices and Heidelberg retina tomograph parameters. J Glaucoma. 1997;6:78-82.
29. Brigatti L, Caprioli J. Correlation of visual field with scanning confocal laser optic disc measurements in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113: 1191-1194.
30. Tole DM, Edwards MP, Davey KG, et al. The correlation of the visual field with scanning laser ophthalmoscope measurements in glaucoma. Eye. 1998;12:686-690.
31. Funk J, Bornscheuer C, Grehn F. Neuroretinal rim area and visual field in glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1988;226:431-434.
32. Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Naumann GOH. Optic disc morphometry in chronic primary open-angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1988; 226:531-538.
33. Iester M, Mardin CY, Budde WM, et al. Discriminant analysis formulas of optic nerve head parameters measured by confocal scanning laser tomography. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:97-104.
34. Iester M, Mikelberg FS, Swindale NV, et al. ROC analysis of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph optic disc shape measures in glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol. 1997;32:382-388.
35. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1557-1563.
36. Kamal DS, Viswanathan AC, Garway-Heath DF, et al. Detection of optic disc change with the Heidelberg retina tomograph before confirmed visual field change in ocular hypertensives converting to early glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:290-294.
37. Chauhan BC, McCormick TA, Nicolela MT, et al. Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1492-1499.