Comparison between high-pass resolution perimetry and differential light sensitivity perimetry in patients with glaucoma

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 111-116

  Birt, Catherine M ^a,c   Shin, Dong H ^b   McCarty, Beverly ^b   Kim, Chaesik ^b   Lee, Damho T ^b   Chung, Hak S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Differential light sensitivity perimetry; Glaucoma; High pass resolution perimetry; Visual field

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 0031976736     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00061198-199804000-00008     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Frisen L. High-pass resolution perimetry: recent developments. In: Heijl A, ed. Perimetry: update 1988/89. Amsterdam: Kugler & Ghedini, 1989;369-75.
2. Frisen L. High-pass resolution perimetry. a clinical review. Doc Ophthalmol 1993;83:1-25.
3. Frisen L. Theoretical aspects of high-pass resolution perimetry. Malmo, High Tech Vision AB 1991;1-17.
4. Lachenmayr BJ, Drance SM, Douglas GR, Mikelberg FS. Light-sense, flicker and resolution perimetry in glaucoma: a comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1991;229:246-51.
5. Wanger P, Persson HE. Patter-reversal electroretinograms and high-pass resolution perimetry in suspected or early glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1987;94:1098-103.
6. Anderson DR. Automated static perimetry. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book 1992;78.
7. Dannheim F, Abramo F, Verhohr D. Comparison of automated conventional and spatial resolution perimetry in glaucoma. In: Heijl A, ed. Perimetry: update 1998/89. Amsterdam: Kusler & Ghedini, 1989;383-92.
8. Van Buskirk EM, Fraser J. High pass resolution perimetry vs. automated static light threshold perimetry in glaucoma suspects [Abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32(suppl):1104.
9. Sample PA, Ahn DS, Lee PC, Weinreb RN. High-pass resolution perimetry in eyes with ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1992;113:309-16.
10. Chauhan BC, LeBlanc RP, McCormick TA, Roger JB. Comparisons of high-pass resolution perimetry and pattern discrimination perimetry to conventional perimetry in glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol 1993;28:306-11.
11. Lindblom B, Hoyt WF. High-pass resolution perimetry in neuroophthalmology. clinical impressions. Ophthalmology 1992;99: 700-5.
12. Dannheim F, Roggenbuck C. Comparison of automated conventional and spatial resolution perimetry in chiasmal lesions. In: Heijl A, ed. Perimetry: update 1988/89. Amsterdam: Kugler & Ghedini, 1989;377-82.
13. Wall M, Conway MD, House PH, Allely R. Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of spatial resolution and Humphrey automated perimetry in pseudotumor cerebri patients and normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:3306-12.
14. Wall M, Lefante J, Conway M. Variability of high-pass resolution perimetry in normals and patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:3091-5.
15. Wall M. High-pass resolution perimetry in optic neuritis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:2525-9.
16. Chauhan BC, Mohandas RN, Whelan JH, McCormick TA. Comparison of reliability indices in conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry. Ophthalmology 1993;100:1089-94.
17. Birt CM, Shin DH, Samudrala V, et al. Analysis of reliability indices from Humphrey visual field tests in an urban glaucoma population. Ophthalmology 1997;104:1126-30.
18. Martin-Boglind LM, Wanger P. The influence of feedback devices, learning and cheating on the results of high-pass resolution perimetry. In: Heijl A, ed. Perimetry: update 1988/89. Amsterdam: Kugler & Ghedini, 1989;393-8.
19. Drance SM, Douglas GR, Schulzer M, Wijsman CS. The learning effect of the Frisen high pass resolution perimeter. In: Heijl A, ed. Perimetry: update 1988/89. Amsterdam: Kugler & Ghedini, 1989;199-201.