formative peer review of teaching: Attitudes of faculty at liberal arts colleges toward colleague assessment

Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 67-87

  Keig, Larry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 25644455793     PISSN: 0920525X     EISSN: 15730425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008194230542     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. Abrami, P.C. (1985). Dimensions of effective college instruction. Review of Higher Education, 8, 211-228.
2. Aleamoni, L.M. (1981, March). Standards for evaluation of instruction. Note to the Faculty (No. 11). Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Office of Instructional Research and Development.
3. Aleamoni, L.M. (1987). Some practical approaches for faculty and administrators. In L. M. Aleamoni (Ed.), New directions for teaching and learning: No. 31. Techniques for evaluating and improving teaching (pp. 75-78). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Aleamoni, L.M. (1999). Student rating myths versus research facts from 1924 to 1998. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13(2), 153-166.
5. Arreola, R.A. (1984). Evaluation of faculty performance: Key issues. In P. Seldin (Ed.), Changing practices in faculty evaluation: A critical assessment and recommendations for improvement (pp. 79-85). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Arreola, R.A. (1995). Developing a comprehensive evaluation system: A handbook for college faculty and administrators on designing and operating a comprehensive faculty evaluation system. Bolton, MA: Anker.
7. Austin, A.E. (1992a). Supporting junior faculty through a teaching fellows program. In M. D. Sorcinelli & A. E. Austin (Eds.), New directions for teaching and learning: No. 50. Developing new and junior faculty (pp. 73-86). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
8. Austin, A.E. (1992b). Supporting the professor as teacher: The Lilly Teaching Fellows Program. Review of Higher Education, 16, 85-106.
9. Austin, J., Sweet, A., & Overholt, C. (1991). To see ourselves as others see us: The rewards of classroom observation. In C. R. Christiansen, D. A. Garvin, & A. Sweet (Eds.), Education for judgment: The artistry of discussion leadership (pp. 215-229). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
10. Baldwin, R.G. (1990). Faculty vitality beyond the research university. Journal of Higher Education, 61, 160-180.
11. Bell, M.E., Dobson, E.C., & Gram, J.M. (1977). Peer evaluation as a method of faculty development. Journal of the College and University Personnel Administration, 25(4), 15-17.
12. Blackwell, R., & McLean, M. (1996). Faculty observation of teaching and staff development. Higher Education Quarterly, 50(2), 156-171.
13. Boyer, E.L. (1987). College: The undergraduate years, New York: Harper & Row.
14. Boyer, E.L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate, Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
15. Brinko, K.T. (1993). The practice of giving feedback to improve teaching: What is effective? Journal of Higher Education, 64, 574-593.
16. Britt, N., Jr. (1982). Faculty attitudes about colleague evaluation of teaching. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 5034A (University Microfilms No. 82-09886).
17. Brock, S.C. (1981). Evaluation-based teacher development. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 229-243). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18. Bulcock, J.W. (1984, June). Why can't we define good teaching? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, Guelph, Ontario (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 248 207).
19. Cancelli, A. (1987, April). Methods for arriving at clinical judgments in peer evaluation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 282 924).
20. Centra, J.A. (1979). Determining faculty effectiveness: Assessing teaching, research, and service for personnel decisions and improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Centra, J.A. (1986, April). Colleague evaluation: The critical link. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 275-722).
22. Centra, J.A. (1993). Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Chronicle of Higher Education (1997, August 29). Almanac Issue (p. 26).
24. Cohen, P.A., & McKeachie, W.J. (1980). The role of colleagues in the evaluation of college teaching. Improving College and University Teaching, 25(4), 147-154.
25. Copeland, W.D., & Jamgochian, R. (1985). Colleague training and peer review. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(2), 18-21.
26. Cowen, D.L., Davis, G.L., & Bird, S.E. (1976, February). Peer review in medical education. Journal of Medical Education, 51, 130-131.
27. Cross, K.P. (1986a). A proposal to improve teaching-or-what taking teaching seriously should mean. AAHE Bulletin, 39(1), 9-14.
28. Cross, K.P. (1986b). Using assessment to improve instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 284-296).
29. Dressel, P.L. (1976). Faculty. In P. L. Dressel (Ed.), Handbook of academic evaluation (pp. 331-375). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. Ellett, C.D., McMullen, J.H., Rugutt, J.K., & Culross, R.R. (1997, March). Linking personal learning environment, quality of teaching and learning, and learning efficacy: An initial study of college students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 410 770).
31. Eble, K.E. (1988). The craft of teaching: A guide to mastering the professor's art. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32. Edgerton, R. (1988). All roads lead to teaching. AAHE Bulletin, 40(8), 3-9.
33. Edgerton, R., Hutchings, P., & Quinlan, K. (1991). The teaching portfolio: Capturing the scholarship of teaching. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
34. Elbow, P. (1980). One-to-one faculty development. In J. F. Noonan (Ed.), New directions for teaching and learning: No. 4. Learning about teaching (pp. 25-40). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35. Elbow, P. (1986). Embracing contraries: Explorations in learning and teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Fact Book on Higher Education. (1998). 1997 Edition (p. 151). Phoenix, AZ: Oryx.
37. Fairweather, J.S. (1993). Academic values and faculty rewards. Review of Higher Education, 17(1), 43-68.
38. Glassick, C.E., Huber, M.T., & Maeroff, G.I. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39. Golin, S. (1990). Four arguments for peer collaboration & student interviewing: The Master Faculty Program. AAHE Bulletin, 43(4), 9-10.
40. Hart, F.R. (1987). Teachers observing teachers. In J. H. Broderick (Ed.), Teaching at an urban university (pp. 15-24). Boston: University of Massachusetts at Boston (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 290 704).
41. Hodgkinson, H. (1972). Unlock your doors, let your colleagues in: Faculty rewards and assessment systems. In J. Braun & T. A. Emmet (Eds.), The academic department and division chairman (pp. 208-215). Detroit: Balamp.
42. Hoyt, D.P., & Howard, G.S. (1978). The evaluation of faculty development programs. Research in Higher Education, 8, 25-38.
43. Hutchings, P. (1996). The peer review of teaching: Progress, issues and prospects. Innovative Higher Education, 20(4), 221-234.
44. Katz, J., & Henry, M. (1988). Turning professors into teachers: A new approach to faculty development and student learning. New York: American Council on Education/Macmillan.
45. Keig, L.W. (1988). Faculty evaluation: Iowa Association of Independent Colleges and Universities. Unpublished manuscript.
46. Keig, L.W., & Waggoner, M.D. (1994). Collaborative peer review: The role of faculty in improving college teaching (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 2). Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
47. Keig, L.W., & Waggoner, M.D. (1995). Peer review of teaching: Improving college instruction through formative assessment. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 6(3), 51-83.
48. Licata, C.M. (1986). Post-tenure faculty evaluation: Opportunity or threat (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 1). Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
49. Lindquist, J. (1979). Approaches to collegiate teaching improvement. In J. Lindquist (Ed.), Designing teaching improvement programs (pp. 1-22). Washington, DC: Council for the Advancement of Small Colleges.
50. Mathias, H., & Rutherford, D. (1982a). Course evaluation at Birmingham: Some implications for the evaluation of university teaching. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 7(3), 263-266.
51. Mathias, H., & Rutherford, D. (1982b). Lecturers as evaluators: The Birmingham experience. Studies in Higher Education, 7(1), 47-56.
52. Mathis, B.C. (1979). Persuading the institution to experiment: Strategies for seduction (Occasional Paper No. 9). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, Center for the Teaching Professions.
53. McKeachie, W.J. (1994). Teaching tips (9th ed.). Lexington, MA: Heath.
54. McKeachie, W.J., & Kaplan, M. (1996). Persistent problems in evaluating college teaching. AAHE Bulletin, 48(6), 5-8.
55. Menges, R.J. (1985). Career-span faculty development. College Teaching, 55(4), 181-184.
56. Menges, R.J. (1987). Colleagues as catalysts for change in teaching. To Improve the Academy, 6, 83-93.
57. Millis, B.J. (1989). Colleagues helping colleagues: A peer observation program model. Journal of Staff, Program, and Organization Development, 7(1), 15-21.
58. Millis, B.J. (1992). Conducting effective peer classroom observations. To Improve the Academy, 11, 189-206.
59. Millis, B.J. (1994a). Faculty development in the 1990s: What is it and why we can't wait. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72, 454-464.
60. Millis, B.J. (1994b). Forging the ties that bind: Peer mentoring part-time faculty. In M. A. Wunsch (Ed.), New directions for teaching and learning: No. 57. Mentoring revisited: Making an impact on individuals and institution (pp. 73-80). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
61. Millis, B.J., & Kaplan, B.B. (1995). Enhancing teaching through peer classroom observations. In P. Seldin (Ed.), Improving college teaching (pp. 137-151). Bolton, MA: Anker.
62. National Center for Educational Statistics. (1997). Digest of Educational Statistics (p. 244). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
63. New Jersey Institute for Collegiate Teaching and Learning. (1991). Partners in Learning. South Orange, NJ: Seton Hall University.
64. "Peer review of teaching institute." (1993). AAHE Bulletin, 46(10), 16, 18.
65. Perlberg, A. (1983). When professors confront themselves: Toward a theoretical conceptualization of video self-confrontation in higher education. Higher Education, 12, 633-663.
66. Pew Higher Education Research Program. (1989). The business of the business. Policy Perspectives, 1, 1-7.
67. Quinlan, K.M. (1995). Faculty perspectives on peer review. Thought and Action, 11(2), 5-22.
68. Quinlan, K.M. (1996). Involving peers in the evaluation and improvement of teaching: A menu of strategies. Innovative Higher Education, 20(4), 299-307.
69. Rice, R.E., & Cheldelin, S.I. (1989). The knower and the known: Making the connections: Evaluation of the New Jersey Master Faculty Program. South Orange, NJ: Seton Hall University, New Jersey Institute for Collegiate Teaching and Learning.
70. Scriven, M.S. (1980). The evaluation of college teaching. Syracuse, NY: National Council of States on Inservice Education (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 203 729).
71. Scriven, M.S. (1983). Evaluation ideologies. In G. R. Madaus, M. S. Scriven, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation, (pp. 242-249). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhof.
72. Scriven, M.S. (1985). New frontiers of evaluation. Evaluation Practices, 7(1), 7-44.
73. Seldin, P. (1984). Changing practices in faculty evaluation, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
74. Seldin, P. (1990). How administrators can improve teaching: Moving from talk to action in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
75. Seldin, P. (1998, March). How colleges evaluate teaching, 1988 vs 1998. AAHE Bulletin, 50(7), 3-7.
76. Shatzky, J., & Silberman, R. (1986). Master-students: A teaching technique. Journal of College Science Teaching, 16, 119-120.
77. Skoog, G. (1980). Improving college teaching through peer observation. Journal of Teacher Education, 31(2), 23-25.
78. Snedecor, F.W., & Cochran, W.G. (1967). Statistical methods (6th ed.). Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
79. Soderberg, L.O. (1986), March). A credible model: Evaluating classroom teaching in higher education. Instructional Evaluation, 8, 13-27.
80. Stoner, M., & Martin, L. (1993, November). Talking about teaching across the disciplines: How cognitive peer coaching makes it happen. Paper presented at the 79th annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Miami, FL.
81. Study Group on the Conditions of Excellence in American Higher Education. (1984). Involvement in learning: Realizing the potential of American higher education. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education/US. Department of Education.
82. Sweeney, J.M. (1976). A report on the development and use of a faculty peer evaluation/development program. Dissertation Abstracts International, 37, 5458A (University Microfilms No. 76-30, 408).
83. Sweeney, J.M., & Grasha, A.F. (1979). Improving teaching through faculty development triads. Educational Technology, 19(2), 54-57.
84. Weimer, M. (1987, April). Translating evaluation results into teaching improvements. AAHE Bulletin, 59(8), 8-11.
85. Wilson, R.C., Dienst, E.R., & Watson, N.L. (1973). Characteristics of effective college teachers as perceived by their colleagues. Journal of Educational Measurement, 10, 31-37.
86. Woolwine, D.E. (1988). New Jersey Master Faculty Program research report. South Orange, NJ: Seton Hall University, New Jersey Institute for Collegiate Teaching and Learning.