Making good use of online case study materials

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 413-429

  Keefer, Matthew Wilks ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Case based reasoning; Moral reasoning; Online instruction; Professional ethics

Indexed keywords

EID: 25444517603     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-005-0010-7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. Griffin, N. (1988) Using "Ethics in Teaching" in teaching in ethics: Student views on the case studies, Teaching Philosophy 11(2): 116-127.
2. Arras, J. D. (1991) Getting Down to Cases: The Revival of Casuistry in Bioethics, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16: 29-51.
3. Pritchard, M.S. (1992) Teaching Engineering Ethics: A Case Study Approach, National Science Foundation, Grant DIR-8820837.
4. Pritchard, M.S. (1998) Professional Responsibility: Focusing on the Exemplary, Science and Engineering Ethics 4(2): 215-234.
5. Pinkus, R.L.B., Shuman, L.J., Hummon, N.P., Wolfe, H. (1997) Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost, Schedule, and Risk - Lessons Learned from the Space Shuttle. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
6. Whitbeck, C. (1995) Teaching Ethics to Scientists and Engineers: Moral Agents and Moral Problems, Science and Engineering Ethics 1: 299-308.
7. Whitbeck, C. (1996) Ethics as Design: Doing Justice to Moral Problems, Hastings Center Report No. 3: 9-16.
8. nd Ed. (2000) Engineering Ethics, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
9. Whitbeck, C. (1998) Ethics in Engineering Practice and Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10. Ashley, K.D. and Keefer, M.W. (1996) Ethical Reasoning Strategies and Their Relation to Case-Based Instruction: Some Preliminary Results, Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 483-488.
11. Keefer, M.W. and Olson, D. (1995) Moral reasoning and moral concern: An alternative to Gilligan's gender based hypothesis. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 27(4): 420-437.
12. Keefer, M. W. (2003) Moral Reasoning and Case-based Approaches to Ethical Instruction in Science. In: Dana L. Zeidler (Ed) The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and Discourse in Science Education, Kluwer Academic Publishers: AA Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
13. Raz, J. (1990) Practical reason and norms, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
14. Keefer, M.W. and Ashley, K.D. (2001) Case-based Approaches to Professional Ethics: A systematic comparison of students' and ethicists' moral reasoning, The Journal of Moral Education 30(4): 377-398.
15. Whitbeck, C. (1996) Problems and Cases: New Directions in Ethics 1980-1996, Journal of Professional Ethics 5: 4.
16. Colby, A., and Kohlberg, L. (1987) The measurement of moral judgment, Vol. 2: Standard issue scoring manual. Cambridge University Press, New York.
17. Rest, J. (1983) Morality. In: J. Flavell & E. Markham (Eds.), Cognitive development. From P. Mussen (ed.) Manual of child psychology (vol. 3, pp. 556-629), Wiley, New York.
18. Hampshire, S. (1983) Fallacies in moral reasoning. In: A. MacIntyre and S. Hauerwas (eds.), Changing perspectives in moral philosophy, Notre Dame University Press, Notre Dame, IN.
19. Gilligan, C. (1982) In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
20. Huff, C. and Frey, W. (2005) Moral pedagogy and practical ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 11: 389-408.
21. Johnston, K. (1988) Adolescents' solutions to dilemmas in fables: Two moral orientations - two problem solving strategies. In: C. Gilligan, J. Ward, J. Taylor & B. Bardige (Eds.), Mapping the moral domain, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
22. Piaget, J. (1971) Biology and knowledge: An essay on the relations between organic regulations and cognitive processes, University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL.
23. Vygotsky, L. (1978) Mind in society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
24. Lave, J., and Wenger, E., (1991) (eds) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation Cambridge University Press, New York.
25. Keefer, M.W., Zeitz, C.M and Resnick, L.B (2000) Judging the quality of peer-led student dialogues, Cognition and Instruction 18(1): 55-83.
26. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1992) The Jasper experiment: An exploration of issues in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development 40: 65-80.
27. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1993) Designing learning environments that support thinking: The Jasper series as a case study. In: T.M. Duffy, J. Lowyck and D.H. Jonassen (eds.), Designing environments for constructive learning, Springer- Verlag, NY, pp. 9-36.
28. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1994) From visual word problems to learning communities: Changing conceptions of cognitive research. In: K. McGilly (ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 157-200.
29. Brown, A.L. and Campione, J.C. (1996) Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In: L. Schauble and R. Glaser (eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 289-325.
30. Bruer, John T. (1993) Schools for Thought: A Science of Learning in the Classroom, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
31. McGilly, K. (1994) (ed.) Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
32. Bereiter, C. (1992) Referent-centered and problem-centered knowledge: Elements of an educational epistemology, Interchange 23/4: 337-361.
33. Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. (1989) Intentional learning as a goal of instruction, pp. 361-392 in: L.B. Resnick (ed.) Knowing, Learning and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
34. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, (2000) National Research Council: National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
35. Keefer, M.W. (2002) Designing reflections on practice: Helping teachers apply cognitive learning principles in an SFT - inquiry-based learning program, Interchange A quarterly review of education 33/4: 395-417.
36. Brown, A. L. and Campione, J.C. (1994) Guided discovery in a community of learners. In: K. McGilly (ed.) Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 229-272.
37. Savery, J.R. and Duffy, T.M. (1995) Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework, Educational Technology (September/October): 31-38.
38. Brown, A.L. and Palincsar, A.S. (1989) Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In: L.B. Resnick (ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 393-451.
39. May, L. (1992) Sharing Responsibility, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
40. Resnick, L.B., Bill, V.L., Leer M.N. and Reams, L.E. (1992) From cupcakes to equations: The structure of discourse in a primary mathematics classroom, Verbum 1-2: 63-85.
41. Resnick L.B., and Collins, A. (1994) Cognition and Learning. In: T. Husen and T.N. Postlethwaite (eds), International encyclopedia of education, 2nd ed., (2), Pergamon, Oxford, pp. 835-838.
42. Zeidler, D. (ed.) (2003) The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston MA.