Science-based occupations and the science curriculum: Concepts of evidence

Science Education

Volumn 89, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 242-275

  Aikenhead, Glen S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 25444516752     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.20046     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. AAAS. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
2. Aikenhead, G. S. (2003). Research report: Concepts of evidence used in science-based occupations: Acute-care nursing. Available at URL: http://www.usask.ca/education/people/aikenhead/acnursing.htm.
3. Atkin, M., & Helms, J. (1993). Getting serious about priorities in science education. Studies in Science Education, 21, 1-20.
4. Bonell, C. (1999). Evidence-based nursing: A stereotyped view of quantitative and experimental research could work against professional autonomy and authority. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30, 18-23.
5. Cajas, F. (1998). Using out-of-school experience in science lessons: An impossible task? International Journal of Science Education, 20, 623-625.
6. Chin, P., Munby, H., Hutchinson, N. L., Taylor, J., & Clark, F. (2004). Where's the science? Understanding the form and function of workplace science. In E. Scanlon, P. Murphy, J. Thomas, & E. Whitelegg (Eds.), Reconsidering science learning (pp. 118-134). London: Routledge Falmer.
7. Closs, J. S., & Cheater, F. M. (1999). Evidence for nursing practice: A clarification of the issues. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30, 10-17.
8. CMEC. (1997). Common framework of science learning outcomes. Ottawa: Council of Ministers of Education of Canada.
9. Cobern, W. W. (1991). World view theory and science education research (NARST Monograph no. 3). Cincinnati, OH: National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
10. Cobern, W. W. (1993). College students' conceptualizations of nature: An interpretive world view analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 935-951.
11. Cobern, W. W., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1998). Cultural aspects of learning science. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 39-52). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
12. Coles, M. (1997). What does industry want from science education? In K. Calhoun, R. Panwar, & S. Shrum (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th symposium of IOSTE (Vol. 1, pp. 292-300). Edmonton: Faculty of Education, University of Alberta.
13. Collingridge, D. (1989). Incremental decision making in technological innovations: What role for science. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 14, 141-162.
14. Costa, V. (1995). When science is "another world": Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school, and science. Science Education, 79, 313-333.
15. Davidson, A., & Schibeci, R. (2000). The consensus conference as a mechanism for community responsive technology policy. In R. T. Cross & P. J. Fensham (Eds.), Science and the citizen for educators and the public (pp. 47-59). Melbourne: Arena Publications.
16. Dori, Y. J., & Tal, R. T. (2000). Formal and informal collaborative projects: Engaging in industry with environ-mental awareness. Science Education, 84, 95-113.
17. Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (2002). What sort of science education do we really need? International Journal of Science Education, 24, 661-679.
18. Eijkelhof, H. M. C. (1994). Toward a research base for teaching ionizing radiation in a risk perspective. In J. Solomon & G. Aikenhead (Eds.), STS education: International perspectives on reform (pp. 205-215). New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Fensham, P. J., & Harlen, W. (1999). School science and public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 755-763.
20. French, P. (1999). The development of evidence-based nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29, 72-78.
21. Furnham, A. (1992). Lay understanding of science: Young people and adults' ideas of scientific concepts. Studies in Science Education, 20, 29-64.
22. Gardner, P. (1994). Representations of the relationship between science and technology in the curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 24, 1-28.
23. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of culture. New York: Basic Books.
24. Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
25. Goshorn, K. (1996). Social rationality, risk, and the right to know: Information leveraging with the toxic release inventory. Public Understanding of Science, 5, 297-320.
26. Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (1996). Practical work: Its role in the understanding of evidence in science. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 791 -806.
27. Gott, R., Duggan, S., & Johnson, P. (1999). What do practising applied scientists do and what are the implications for science education? Research in Science & Technological Education, 17, 97-107.
28. Gott, R., Duggan, S., & Roberts, R. (2003). Understanding scientific evidence. Available at URL: http://www.dur.ac.uk/~ded0rg/Evidence/cofev.htm.
29. Greenwood, J. (2000). Critical thinking and nursing scripts: The case for the development of both. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31, 428-436.
30. Higgs, J., & Jones, M. (2002). Clinical reasoning in the health professions (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Butterworth Heinemann.
31. Hoggan, R. (1997). Absolutism's hidden message for medical scientism. Interchange, 28, 183-189.
32. Hurd, P. (1989, February). A new context for school science education: STS. Paper presented at the Technological Literacy Conference, Washington, DC.
33. Irwin, A. R. (1995). Citizen science: A study of people, expertise and sustainable development. New York: Routledge.
34. Jenkins, E. (1992). School science education: Towards a reconstruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24, 229-246.
35. Jenkins, E. (1999). School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 703-710.
36. Jenkins, E. (2002). Linking school science education with action. In W.-M. Roth & J. Désautels (Eds.), Science education as/for sociopolitical action (pp. 17-34). New York: Peter Lang.
37. Kearney, M. (1984). World view. Novato, CA: Chandler & Sharp.
38. Kitson, A. (2002). Recognising relationships: Reflections on evidence-based practice. Nursing Inquiry, 9, 170-178.
39. Kolstø, S. D. (2000). Consensus projects: Teaching science for citizenship. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 645-664.
40. Kortland, J. (2001). A problem posing approach to teaching decision making about the waste issue. Utrecht: Cdβ Press.
41. Lambert, H., & Rose, H. (1990, April). Disembodied knowledge? Making sense of medical knowledge. A paper presented at the Public Understanding of Science Conference, London Science Museum.
42. Lawrenz, F., & Gray, B. (1995). Investigation of worldview theory in a South African context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 555-568.
43. Layton, D. (1991). Science education and praxis: The relationship of school science to practical action. Studies in Science Education, 19, 43-79.
44. Layton, D., Jenkins, E., Macgill, S., & Davey, A. (1993). Inarticulate science? Perspectives on the public understanding of science and some implications for science education. Driffield, East Yorkshire: Studies in Education.
45. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
46. Lottero-Perdue, P. S., & Brickhouse, N. W. (2002). Learning on the job: The acquisition of scientific competence. Science Education, 86, 756-782.
47. Lyons, T. S. (2003). Decisions by 'science proficient' year 10 students about post-compulsory high school science enrolment: A sociocultural exploration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Armidale, NSW, Australia: University of New England.
48. Macgill, S. (1987). The politics of anxiety. London: Pion.
49. McCaughan, D., Thompson, C., Cullum, N., Sheldon, T. A., & Thompson, D. R. (2002). Acute care nurses' perceptions of barriers to using research information in clinical decision-making. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 39, 46-60.
50. Michael, M. (1992). Lay discourses of science, science-in-general, science-in-particular and self. Science Technology & Human Values, 17, 313-333.
51. Munby, H., Orpwood, G., & Russell, T. (Eds.) (1980). Seeing curriculum in a new light: Essays from science education. Toronto: OISE Press.
52. Osborne, J., Duschl, R., & Fairbrother, B. (2003, March). Breaking the mould? Teaching science for public understanding - Lessons from the classroom. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA.
53. Ratcliffe, M. (1999). Evaluation of abilities in interpreting media reports of scientific research. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 1085-1099.
54. Ratcliffe, M., & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship: Teaching socio-scientific issues. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
55. Ray, L. (1999). Evidence and outcomes: Agendas, presuppositions and power. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30, 1017-1026.
56. Reiss, M. J. (2000). Understanding science lessons: Five years of science teaching. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
57. Resnick, L. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13-20.
58. Roberts, D. A. (1988). What counts as science education? In P. J. Fensham (Ed.), Development and dilemmas in science education (pp. 27-54). New York: Falmer Press.
59. Roberts, D. A., & Russell, T. L. (1975). An alternative approach to science education research: Drawing from philosophical analysis to examine practice. Curriculum Theory Network, 5, 107-125.
60. Roth, W.-M., & Désautels, J. (2004). Educating for citizenship: Reappraising the role of science education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4, 149-168.
61. Ryan, A. G., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1992). Students' preconceptions about the epistemology of science. Science Education, 76, 559-580.
62. Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36, 1-42.
63. Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 513-536.
64. Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 387-409.
65. Sammel, A., & Zandvliet, D. (2003). Science reform or science conform: Problematic assumptions with/in Canadian science reform efforts. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 3, 513-520.
66. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
67. Scholer, A.-M. (2004, April). Performing in the health science class: A self-study of curriculum in a liberal arts college. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, Canada.
68. Solomon, J. (1984). Prompts, cues and discrimination: The utilization of two separate knowledge systems. European Journal of Science Education, 6, 277-284.
69. Stark, J. S., & Lattuca, L. R. (1997). Shaping the college curriculum: Academic plans in action. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
70. Taylor, J. A., & Dana, T. M. (2003). Secondary school physics teachers' conceptions of scientific evidence: An exploratory case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 721-736.
71. Thompson, C. (1999). A conceptual treadmill: The need for 'middle ground' in clinical decision making theory in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30, 1222-1229.
72. Thompson, C., McCaughan, D., Cullum, N., Sheldon, T. A., Mulhall, A., & Thompson, D. R. (2001). Research information in nurses' clinical decision-making: What is useful? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 36, 376-388.
73. Tytler, R., Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (2001a). Dimensions of evidence, the public understanding of science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 815-832.
74. Tytler, R., Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (2001b). Public participation in an environmental dispute: Implications for science education. Public Understanding of Science, 10, 343-364.
75. Upton, D. J. (1999). How can we achieve evidence-based practice if we have a theory-practice gap in nursing today? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29, 549-555.
76. Wallin, L., Boström, A.-M., Wikblad, K., & Ewald, U. (2003). Sustainability in changing clinical practice promotes evidence-based nursing care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41, 509-518.
77. Winch, S., Creedy, D., & Chaboyer, W. (2002). Governing nursing conduct: The rise of evidence-based practice. Nursing Inquiry, 9, 156-161.
78. Wynne, B. (1991). Knowledge in context. Science, Technology & Human Values, 16, 111 - 121.
79. Zeidler, D. L., Osborne, J., Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Monk, M. (2003). The role of argument during discourse about socioscientific issues. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 97-116). Boston, MA: Kluwer.