-
2
-
-
0033988705
-
Pregnancy outcomes in healthy nulliparas who developed hypertension
-
Hauth JC, Ewell MG, Levine RJ, et al: Pregnancy outcomes in healthy nulliparas who developed hypertension. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:24-28
-
(2000)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.95
, pp. 24-28
-
-
Hauth, J.C.1
Ewell, M.G.2
Levine, R.J.3
-
3
-
-
0002881276
-
Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy
-
New York, McGraw-Hill
-
Cunningham FG, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, et al: Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. In Williams Obstetrics. Twenty-first edition. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2001, pp 567-618
-
(2001)
Williams Obstetrics. Twenty-First Edition
, pp. 567-618
-
-
Cunningham, F.G.1
Gant, N.F.2
Leveno, K.J.3
-
5
-
-
0842304555
-
A meta-analysis of controlled-release prostaglandin for cervical ripening and labour induction
-
Crane JM, Bennett KA: A meta-analysis of controlled-release prostaglandin for cervical ripening and labour induction. J Soc Obstet Gynecol Can 2000;22:692-698
-
(2000)
J Soc Obstet Gynecol Can
, vol.22
, pp. 692-698
-
-
Crane, J.M.1
Bennett, K.A.2
-
6
-
-
0035046986
-
Dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening and labor induction: A meta-analysis
-
Hughes EG, Kelly AJ, Kavanagh J: Dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening and labor induction: A meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:847-855
-
(2001)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.97
, pp. 847-855
-
-
Hughes, E.G.1
Kelly, A.J.2
Kavanagh, J.3
-
7
-
-
0032859402
-
Cervical ripening and labor induction with a controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert: A meta-analysis
-
Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Delke I, et al: Cervical ripening and labor induction with a controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert: A meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94:878-883
-
(1999)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.94
, pp. 878-883
-
-
Sanchez-Ramos, L.1
Kaunitz, A.M.2
Delke, I.3
-
8
-
-
0035871405
-
Placental abruption among singleton and twin births in the United States: Risk factor profiles
-
Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Demissie K, et al: Placental abruption among singleton and twin births in the United States: Risk factor profiles. Am J Epidemiol 2001;153:771-778
-
(2001)
Am J Epidemiol
, vol.153
, pp. 771-778
-
-
Ananth, C.V.1
Smulian, J.C.2
Demissie, K.3
-
9
-
-
0002891488
-
Obstetrical hemorrhage
-
New York, McGraw-Hill
-
Cunningham FG, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, et al: Obstetrical hemorrhage. In Williams Obstetrics. Twenty-first edition. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2001, pp 619-669
-
(2001)
Williams Obstetrics. Twenty-First Edition
, pp. 619-669
-
-
Cunningham, F.G.1
Gant, N.F.2
Leveno, K.J.3
-
10
-
-
0031081269
-
Etiologic determinants of abruptio placentae
-
Kramer MS, Usher RH, Pollack R, et al: Etiologic determinants of abruptio placentae. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:221-226
-
(1997)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.89
, pp. 221-226
-
-
Kramer, M.S.1
Usher, R.H.2
Pollack, R.3
-
11
-
-
0036153092
-
Adverse perinatal outcomes are significantly higher in severe gestational hypertension than in mild preeclampsia
-
Buchbinder A, Sibai BM, Caritis S, et al: Adverse perinatal outcomes are significantly higher in severe gestational hypertension than in mild preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:66-71
-
(2002)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.186
, pp. 66-71
-
-
Buchbinder, A.1
Sibai, B.M.2
Caritis, S.3
-
12
-
-
0032480293
-
Risk factors for preeclampsia, abruptio placentae, and adverse neonatal outcomes among women with chronic hypertension
-
Sibai BM, Lindheimer M, Hauth J, et al: Risk factors for preeclampsia, abruptio placentae, and adverse neonatal outcomes among women with chronic hypertension. N Engl J Med 1998;339:667-671
-
(1998)
N Engl J Med
, vol.339
, pp. 667-671
-
-
Sibai, B.M.1
Lindheimer, M.2
Hauth, J.3
-
13
-
-
0027985306
-
Aggressive versus expectant management of severe preeclampsia at 28-32 weeks gestation: A randomized controlled trial
-
Sibai BM, Mercer BM, Schiff E, et al: Aggressive versus expectant management of severe preeclampsia at 28-32 weeks gestation: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171:818-822
-
(1994)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.171
, pp. 818-822
-
-
Sibai, B.M.1
Mercer, B.M.2
Schiff, E.3
-
14
-
-
0034939401
-
Safety and efficacy of misoprostol orally and vaginally: A randomized trial
-
Carlan SJ, Bouldin S, Blust D, et al: Safety and efficacy of misoprostol orally and vaginally: A randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:107-112
-
(2001)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.98
, pp. 107-112
-
-
Carlan, S.J.1
Bouldin, S.2
Blust, D.3
-
15
-
-
0034780730
-
A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor
-
How HY, Leasegurge L, Khoury JC, et al: A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:911-915
-
(2001)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.185
, pp. 911-915
-
-
How, H.Y.1
Leasegurge, L.2
Khoury, J.C.3
-
16
-
-
0035104681
-
In vivo controlled release of PGE2 from a vaginal insert (0.8 mm, 10 mg) during induction of labour
-
Lyrenas S, Clason I, Ulmsten U: In vivo controlled release of PGE2 from a vaginal insert (0.8 mm, 10 mg) during induction of labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2001;108:167-178
-
(2001)
Br J Obstet Gynaecol
, vol.108
, pp. 167-178
-
-
Lyrenas, S.1
Clason, I.2
Ulmsten, U.3
-
17
-
-
84867219176
-
Cervidil® brand of dinoprostone vaginal insert
-
Edited by H Fleming, L Murray, GL Kelly, et al. Montvale, NJ, Medical Economics
-
Cervidil® brand of dinoprostone vaginal insert. In Physicians' Desk Reference. Fifty-eighth edition. Edited by H Fleming, L Murray, GL Kelly, et al. Montvale, NJ, Medical Economics, 2004, pp 1296-1297
-
(2004)
Physicians' Desk Reference. Fifty-Eighth Edition
, pp. 1296-1297
-
-
-
19
-
-
84867192959
-
Cytotec® misoprostol tablets
-
Edited by H Fleming, L Murray, GL Kelly, et al. Montvale, NJ, Medical Economics
-
Cytotec® misoprostol tablets. In Physicians' Desk Reference. Fifty-eighth edition. Edited by H Fleming, L Murray, GL Kelly, et al. Montvale, NJ, Medical Economics, 2004, pp 3109-3111
-
(2004)
Physicians' Desk Reference. Fifty-Eighth Edition
, pp. 3109-3111
-
-
-
20
-
-
0038305326
-
Six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction
-
Agarwal N, Gupta A, Kriplani A, et al: Six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2003;29:147-151
-
(2003)
J Obstet Gynaecol Res
, vol.29
, pp. 147-151
-
-
Agarwal, N.1
Gupta, A.2
Kriplani, A.3
-
21
-
-
0037300997
-
Dinoprostone versus misoprostol: A randomized study of nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor
-
Lokugamage AU, Forsyth SF, Sullivan KR, et al: Dinoprostone versus misoprostol: A randomized study of nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003;82:133-137
-
(2003)
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
, vol.82
, pp. 133-137
-
-
Lokugamage, A.U.1
Forsyth, S.F.2
Sullivan, K.R.3
-
22
-
-
0037392350
-
Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction
-
Garry D, Figueroa R, Kalish RB, et al: Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003;13:254-259
-
(2003)
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
, vol.13
, pp. 254-259
-
-
Garry, D.1
Figueroa, R.2
Kalish, R.B.3
-
23
-
-
0037225316
-
Intracervical misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction
-
Chang YK, Chen WH, Yu MH, et al: Intracervical misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003;80:23-28
-
(2003)
Int J Gynaecol Obstet
, vol.80
, pp. 23-28
-
-
Chang, Y.K.1
Chen, W.H.2
Yu, M.H.3
-
24
-
-
0035221009
-
Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction
-
Neiger R, Greaves PC: Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. Tenn Med 2001;94:25-27
-
(2001)
Tenn Med
, vol.94
, pp. 25-27
-
-
Neiger, R.1
Greaves, P.C.2
-
25
-
-
0029008176
-
Misoprostol: An effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction
-
Wing DA, Rahall A, Jones MM, et al: Misoprostol: An effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:1811-1816
-
(1995)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.172
, pp. 1811-1816
-
-
Wing, D.A.1
Rahall, A.2
Jones, M.M.3
-
26
-
-
0032032238
-
1 misoprostol compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: A randomized trial
-
1 misoprostol compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: A randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:401-405
-
(1998)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.91
, pp. 401-405
-
-
Sanchez-Ramos, L.1
Peterson, D.E.2
Delke, I.3
-
27
-
-
0037246606
-
Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: A randomized controlled trial
-
Dallenbach P, Boulvain M, Viardot C, et al: Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:162-167
-
(2003)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.188
, pp. 162-167
-
-
Dallenbach, P.1
Boulvain, M.2
Viardot, C.3
-
28
-
-
0037268840
-
Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour
-
CD000941
-
Hofmeyr GJ, Gulmezoglu AM: Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;1:CD000941
-
(2003)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
, vol.1
-
-
Hofmeyr, G.J.1
Gulmezoglu, A.M.2
-
29
-
-
0031127185
-
Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: A meta-analysis
-
Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Wears RL, et al: Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: A meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:633-642
-
(1997)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.89
, pp. 633-642
-
-
Sanchez-Ramos, L.1
Kaunitz, A.M.2
Wears, R.L.3
-
30
-
-
0031128312
-
A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices
-
Buser D, Mora G, Arias F: A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:581-585
-
(1997)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.89
, pp. 581-585
-
-
Buser, D.1
Mora, G.2
Arias, F.3
-
31
-
-
0030801237
-
A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction
-
Wing DA, Ortiz-Omphroy G, Paul RH: A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:612-618
-
(1997)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.177
, pp. 612-618
-
-
Wing, D.A.1
Ortiz-Omphroy, G.2
Paul, R.H.3
-
32
-
-
0034202048
-
A randomized comparison of oral and intravaginal misoprostol for labor induction
-
Wing DA, Park MR, Paul RH: A randomized comparison of oral and intravaginal misoprostol for labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:905-908
-
(2000)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.95
, pp. 905-908
-
-
Wing, D.A.1
Park, M.R.2
Paul, R.H.3
-
33
-
-
0037327698
-
Comparative efficacy and cost of the prostaglandin analogs dinoprostone and misoprostol as labor preinduction agents
-
Ramsey PS, Harris DY, Ogburn PL Jr, et al: Comparative efficacy and cost of the prostaglandin analogs dinoprostone and misoprostol as labor preinduction agents. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:560-565
-
(2003)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.188
, pp. 560-565
-
-
Ramsey, P.S.1
Harris, D.Y.2
Ogburn Jr., P.L.3
-
34
-
-
0036147307
-
Labor induction with 25 μg versus 50 μg intravaginal misoprostol: A systematic review
-
Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Delke I: Labor induction with 25 μg versus 50 μg intravaginal misoprostol: A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:145-151
-
(2002)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.99
, pp. 145-151
-
-
Sanchez-Ramos, L.1
Kaunitz, A.M.2
Delke, I.3
-
36
-
-
0030917197
-
Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol in term premature rupture of membranes: A randomized study
-
Sanchez-Ramos L, Chen AH, Kaunitz AM, et al: Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol in term premature rupture of membranes: A randomized study. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:909-912
-
(1997)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.89
, pp. 909-912
-
-
Sanchez-Ramos, L.1
Chen, A.H.2
Kaunitz, A.M.3
-
37
-
-
0034922281
-
A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of two different doses of misoprostol suppositories with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction
-
Khoury AN, Zhou Q-P, Gorenberg DM, et al: A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of two different doses of misoprostol suppositories with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. J Matern Fetal Med 2001;10:186-192
-
(2001)
J Matern Fetal Med
, vol.10
, pp. 186-192
-
-
Khoury, A.N.1
Zhou, Q.-P.2
Gorenberg, D.M.3
-
38
-
-
0036678467
-
Misoprostol versus low-dose oxytocin for cervical ripening: A prospective, randomized, double-masked trial
-
Ferguson JA, Head BH, Frank FH, et al: Misoprostol versus low-dose oxytocin for cervical ripening: A prospective, randomized, double-masked trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:273-279
-
(2002)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.187
, pp. 273-279
-
-
Ferguson, J.A.1
Head, B.H.2
Frank, F.H.3
-
39
-
-
0034987825
-
Misoprostol versus dinoprostone for cervical priming prior to induction of labour in term pregnancy: A randomised controlled trial
-
Rowlands S, Bell R, Donath S, et al: Misoprostol versus dinoprostone for cervical priming prior to induction of labour in term pregnancy: A randomised controlled trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2001;41:145-152
-
(2001)
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol
, vol.41
, pp. 145-152
-
-
Rowlands, S.1
Bell, R.2
Donath, S.3
-
40
-
-
0036157945
-
Comparison of 25 and 50 μg vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction of cervical ripening and labor induction
-
Has R, Batukan C, Ermis H, et al: Comparison of 25 and 50 μg vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction of cervical ripening and labor induction. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2002;53:16-21
-
(2002)
Gynecol Obstet Invest
, vol.53
, pp. 16-21
-
-
Has, R.1
Batukan, C.2
Ermis, H.3
-
41
-
-
0345486992
-
Oral or vaginal misoprostol administration for induction of labor: A randomized, double-blind trial
-
Adair CD, Weeks JW, Barrilleaux S, et al: Oral or vaginal misoprostol administration for induction of labor: A randomized, double-blind trial. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:810-813
-
(1998)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.92
, pp. 810-813
-
-
Adair, C.D.1
Weeks, J.W.2
Barrilleaux, S.3
-
42
-
-
0036180032
-
Buccal versus intravaginal misoprostol administration for cervical ripening
-
Carlan SJ, Blust D, O'Brien WF: Buccal versus intravaginal misoprostol administration for cervical ripening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:229-233
-
(2002)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.186
, pp. 229-233
-
-
Carlan, S.J.1
Blust, D.2
O'Brien, W.F.3
-
43
-
-
0030964275
-
Absorption kinetics of misoprostol with oral or vaginal administration
-
Zieman M, Fong SK, Benowitz NL, et al: Absorption kinetics of misoprostol with oral or vaginal administration. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:88-92
-
(1997)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.90
, pp. 88-92
-
-
Zieman, M.1
Fong, S.K.2
Benowitz, N.L.3
-
44
-
-
0033081990
-
Comparison between oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol on uterine contractility
-
Danielsson KG, Marions L, Rodriguez A, et al: Comparison between oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol on uterine contractility. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:275-280
-
(1999)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.93
, pp. 275-280
-
-
Danielsson, K.G.1
Marions, L.2
Rodriguez, A.3
-
45
-
-
0029811710
-
A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction
-
Wing DA, Paul RH: A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:158-164
-
(1996)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.175
, pp. 158-164
-
-
Wing, D.A.1
Paul, R.H.2
|