-
1
-
-
0028999876
-
2, estradiol, and oxytocin
-
2, estradiol, and oxytocin. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 172:(6):1995;1702-1708.
-
(1995)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.172
, Issue.6
, pp. 1702-1708
-
-
Magann, E.F.1
Perry K.G., Jr.2
Dockery J.R., Jr.3
Bass, J.D.4
Chauhan, S.P.5
Morrison, J.C.6
-
2
-
-
0024477755
-
2 gel for cervical ripening and induction of labor: A critical analysis
-
2 gel for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a critical analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 160:(3):1989;529-534.
-
(1989)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.160
, Issue.3
, pp. 529-534
-
-
Rayburn, W.F.1
-
7
-
-
0032980657
-
Intracervical misoprostol as an effective method of labor induction at term
-
Liu H.S., Chu T.Y., Chang Y.K., Yu M.H., Chen W.H. Intracervical misoprostol as an effective method of labor induction at term. Int J Obstet Gynecol. 64:(1):1999;49-53.
-
(1999)
Int J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.64
, Issue.1
, pp. 49-53
-
-
Liu, H.S.1
Chu, T.Y.2
Chang, Y.K.3
Yu, M.H.4
Chen, W.H.5
-
9
-
-
0031128312
-
A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices
-
Buser D., Mora G., Arias F. A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices. Obstet Gynecol. 89:(4):1997;581-585.
-
(1997)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.89
, Issue.4
, pp. 581-585
-
-
Buser, D.1
Mora, G.2
Arias, F.3
-
10
-
-
0031106718
-
A randomized trial of misoprostol and oxytocin for induction of labor: Safety and efficacy
-
Kramer R.L., Gilson G.J., Morrison D.S., Martin D., Gonzales J.L., Qualls C.R. A randomized trial of misoprostol and oxytocin for induction of labor: safety and efficacy. Obstet Gynecol. 89:(3):1997;387-391.
-
(1997)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.89
, Issue.3
, pp. 387-391
-
-
Kramer, R.L.1
Gilson, G.J.2
Morrison, D.S.3
Martin, D.4
Gonzales, J.L.5
Qualls, C.R.6
-
11
-
-
0031106509
-
Oral administration of misoprostol for labor induction: A randomized controlled trial
-
Windrim R., Bennett K., Mundle W., Young D.C. Oral administration of misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 89:(3):1997;392-397.
-
(1997)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.89
, Issue.3
, pp. 392-397
-
-
Windrim, R.1
Bennett, K.2
Mundle, W.3
Young, D.C.4
-
12
-
-
0029008176
-
Misoprostol: An effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction
-
Wing D.A., Rahall A., Jones M.M., Goodwin T.M., Paul R.H. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 172:(6):1995;1811-1816.
-
(1995)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.172
, Issue.6
, pp. 1811-1816
-
-
Wing, D.A.1
Rahall, A.2
Jones, M.M.3
Goodwin, T.M.4
Paul, R.H.5
-
13
-
-
0028144536
-
Intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents
-
Fletcher H., Mitchell S., Frederick J., Simeon D., Brown D. Intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents. Obstet Gynecol. 83:(2):1994;244-247.
-
(1994)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.83
, Issue.2
, pp. 244-247
-
-
Fletcher, H.1
Mitchell, S.2
Frederick, J.3
Simeon, D.4
Brown, D.5
-
14
-
-
0031127185
-
Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: A meta-analysis
-
Sanchez-Ramos L., Kaunitz A.M., Wears R.L., Delke I., Gaudier F.L. Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 89:(4):1997;633-642.
-
(1997)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.89
, Issue.4
, pp. 633-642
-
-
Sanchez-Ramos, L.1
Kaunitz, A.M.2
Wears, R.L.3
Delke, I.4
Gaudier, F.L.5
-
15
-
-
0036155146
-
Labor induction with vaginal misoprostol and extra-amniotic prostaglandin F2 alpha gel
-
Majoko F., Zwizwai M., Lindmark G., Nystrom L. Labor induction with vaginal misoprostol and extra-amniotic prostaglandin F2 alpha gel. Int J Obstet Gynecol. 76:(2):2002;127-133.
-
(2002)
Int J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.76
, Issue.2
, pp. 127-133
-
-
Majoko, F.1
Zwizwai, M.2
Lindmark, G.3
Nystrom, L.4
-
16
-
-
0036147307
-
Labor induction with 25 microg versus 50 microg intravaginal misoprostol: A systematic review
-
Sanchez-Ramos L., Kaunitz A.M., Delke I. Labor induction with 25 microg versus 50 microg intravaginal misoprostol: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 99:(1):2002;145-151.
-
(2002)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.99
, Issue.1
, pp. 145-151
-
-
Sanchez-Ramos, L.1
Kaunitz, A.M.2
Delke, I.3
-
17
-
-
0031795821
-
A comparison between 25 micrograms and 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for labor induction
-
Srisomboon J., Singchai S. A comparison between 25 micrograms and 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for labor induction. J Med Assoc Thailand. 81:(10):1998;779-783.
-
(1998)
J Med Assoc Thailand
, vol.81
, Issue.10
, pp. 779-783
-
-
Srisomboon, J.1
Singchai, S.2
|