Publishing qualitative adult education research: A peer review perspective

Studies in the Education of Adults

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 163-179

  Taylor, Edward W ^a   Beck, Julie ^a   Ainsworth, Elaine ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2542589216     PISSN: 02660830     EISSN: 14789833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02660830.2001.11661452     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Becker, H S, (1995). Writing for Social Scientists, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Beyer, J M, (1978). ‘Editorial policies and practices among leading journals in four scientific fields’, The Sociological Quarterly, vol 19, no 1, pp 68–88.
3. Biggs, M, (1991). ‘The impact of peer review on intellectual freedom’, Library Trends, vol 39, no 1/2, pp 145–67.
4. Campanario, J M, (1996). ‘Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times?’, Journal of American Society for Information Science, vol 47, no 4, pp 302–10.
5. Ceci, S J, and Peters, D P, (1982). ‘Peer review: a study of reliability’, Change, vol 9, no 4, pp 44–48.
6. Charmaz, K, (2000). ‘Grounded theory’, in Denzin, N K, and Lincoln, Y S, (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, London: SAGE, pp 509–34.
7. Cocklin, B, (1996). ‘Applying qualitative research to adult education: reflections upon the analytic process’, Studies in the Education of Adults, vol 28, no 1, pp 88–116.
8. Coelho, R J, and La Forge, J, (2000). ‘Manuscript characteristics affecting reviewers’ decisions for rehabilitation counseling related journals’, Journal of Rehabilitation, vol 66, no 2, pp 4–8.
9. Critchton, R R, (1989). ‘Complacent reviewing’, Nature, vol 337, no 6203, pp 110.
10. Elmore, P B, and Woehilke, P L, (1996). ‘Research methods employed in American Educational Research Journal, Education Researcher, and Review of Educational Research from 1978 to 1995’, ERIC Document Reproduction Service no ED 397 122.
11. Elmore, P B, and Woehilke, P L, (1998). ‘Twenty years of research methods employed in American Educational Research Journal, Education Researcher, and Review of Educational Research from 1978 to 1997’, ERIC Document Reproduction Service no ED 420 701.
12. Fox, M F, (1994). ‘Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes’, Journal of Higher Education, vol 65, no 3, pp 289–309.
13. Geertz, C, (1973). The Interpretation of Culture. New York: Basic Books.
14. Gilner, J, (1994). ‘Reviewing qualitative research: proposed criteria for fairness and rigor’, The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, vol 14, no 2, pp 78–90.
15. Glaser, B G, (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity, Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
16. Glaser, B G, (1992). Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence vs. Forcing, Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
17. Glesne, C, and Peshkin, A, (1992). Becoming Qualitative Researchers, White Plains, NY: Longman.
18. Glogoff, S, (1988). ‘Reviewing the gatekeepers: a survey of referees of library journals’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol 39, no 6, pp 400–7.
19. Goetz, J P, and LeCompte, M D, (1984). Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research, Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
20. Hernon, P, Smith, A, and Croxen, M B, (1993). ‘Publication in College and Research Libraries: Accepted, rejected, and published papers, 1980–1991’, College and Research Libraries, vol 54, no 4, pp. 303–21.
21. Hibbard, J L, (1999). The Peer-Reviewed Journal: A Comprehensive Guide Through the Editorial Process, Washington: Technical Communication.
22. Lander, D, (2000). ‘Mixed metaphors for reading and writing the qualitative thesis in adult education’, Studies in the Education of Adults, vol 32, no 2, pp 148–65.
23. Leslie, L Z, (1990). ‘Peer review practices of mass communication scholarly journals’, Evaluation Review, vol 14, no 2, pp 151–65.
24. Lincoln, Y, and Guba, E, (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
25. Lock, S, (1985). A Difficult Balance, London: The Nuffield Provincial Hospital Trust.
26. Lofland, J, (1974). ‘Styles of reporting qualitative field research’, American Sociologist, vol 9, no 3, pp 101–11.
27. Merriam, S B, (1994). ‘Writing and submitting a manuscript for publication’, in Garrison, D R, (ed), Research Perspectives in Adult Education, Malabar, FL: Krieger, pp 117–32.
28. Merriam, S B, (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Merriam, S B, and Simpson (1995). A Guide to Research for Educators and Trainers of Adults, Malabar, FL: Krieger.
30. Murray, R B, and Raths, J, (1996). ‘Factors in the peer review of reviews’, Review of Educational Research, vol 66, no 4, pp 417–21.
31. Patterson, K, and Bailar, J C, III (1985). ‘A peer review of journal peer review’, in Warren, K S, (ed), Selectivity in Information Systems: Survival of the Fittest, New York: Praeger Publishers, pp 64–82.
32. Patton, M Q, (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, New York: Sage.
33. Richardson, L, (1994). ‘Writing: a method of inquiry’, in Denzin, N K, and Lincoln, Y S., (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Seale, C, (1999). The Quality of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Smith, M L, (1987). ‘Publishing qualitative research’, American Educational Research Journal, vol 24, no 2, pp 173–84.
36. Speck, B W, (1993). Publication Peer Review: An Annotated Bibliography, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
37. Strauss, A, and Corbin, J, (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Taylor, E W, (1993). ‘Gatekeeping and the AEQ: An insider's view’, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Adult Education Research Conference, State College, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University, pp 281–86
39. Taylor, E W, (2001). ‘The AEQ from 1989–1999: a content analysis of all submissions’, Adult Education Quarterly, vol, 51 no 4, pp 322–40.
40. Wallace, D P, and Fleet, C V, (1998). ‘Qualitative research and the editorial tradition: a mixed metaphor’, Library Trends, vol 46, pp 752–69.
41. Wolcott, H F, (1990). Writing up Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Wolcott, H F, (1994). Transforming Qualitative Data, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Yager, R E, (1982). ‘Factors involved with qualitative synthesis: a new focus for research in science education’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol 19, no 5, pp 337–50.
43. Zaruba, K E, Toma, J D, and Stark, J S, (1996). ‘Criteria used for qualitative research in the refereeing process’, The Review of Higher Education, vol 19, no 4, pp 435–60.