Speculation about behavior, brain damage, and self-organization: The other way to herd a cat

Brain and Language

Volumn 90, Issue 1-3, 2004, Pages 151-159

  Colangelo, Annette ^a   Holden, John G ^b   Buchanan, Lori ^a   Van Orden, Guy C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APHASIA; AUTOMATION; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; BOOK; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLLEGE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; DISPERSION; DYSLEXIA; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; PERFORMANCE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REDUCTION; SELF EVALUATION; SEMANTICS; WORD RECOGNITION;

APHASIA; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; DYSLEXIA; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; REACTION TIME; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 2542468644     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00428-0     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. Anderson B., Mennemeire M., Chatterjee A. Variability not ability: Another basis for performance decrements in neglect. Neuropsychologia. 38:2003;785-796
2. Andrews S., Heathcote A. Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word identification: A matter of some moment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 27:2001;514-544
3. Balota D., Speiler D. Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: Beyond measures of central tendency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 128:1999;32-55
4. Bak P. How nature works. 1996;Springer, New York
5. Buchanan L., Hildebrandt N., MacKinnon G.E. Implicit phonological processing in deep dyslexia: A rowse is implicitly a rose. Journal of Neurolinguistics. 8:1994;163-182
6. Buchanan L., Hildebrandt N., MacKinnon G.E. Phonological processing in acquired deep dyslexia re-examined. Klein R., McMullen P. Converging methods for understanding reading and dyslexia. 1999;Mit Press, Cambridge, MA, USA
7. Depew D.J., Weber B.H. Darwinism evolving: Systems dynamics and the genealogy of natural selection. 1995;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
8. Efron B., Tibshirani R.J. An introduction to the bootstrap. 1998;Chapmann & Hall/CRC, New York
9. Estes W.K., Maddox W.T. On the processes underlying stimulus-familiarity effects on recognition of words and nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 28:2002;1003-1018
10. Farah M.J. Neuropsychological inference with an interactive brain: A critique of the "locality" assumption. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 17:1994;43-104
11. Farrar W.T., Van Orden G.C. Errors as multistable response options. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences. 5:2001;223-265
12. Farrar W.T., Van Orden G.C., Hamouz V. When SOFA primes TOUCH: Interdependence of spelling, sound, and meaning in semantically mediated phonological priming. Memory & Cognition. 29:2001;530-539
13. Fodor J. The mind doesn't work that way: The scope and limits of computational psychology. 2000;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
14. Frediksson J., Holland A., Coull B., Plante E., Trourad T., Beeson P. Aphasia severity: Association with cerebral perfusion and diffusion. Aphasiology. 16:2002;859-871
15. Gilden D.L. Fluctions in the time required for elementary decisions. Psychological Science. 8:1997;296-301
16. Gilden D.L. Cognitive emissions of 1/f noise. Psychological Review. 108:2001;33-56
17. Grossberg S., Stone G.O. Neural dynamics of word recognition and recall: Priming, learning, and resonance. Psychological Review. 93:1986;46-74
18. Holden J.G. Fractal characteristics of response time variability. Ecological Psychology. 14:2002;53-86
19. Hultsch D.F., MacDonald S.W.S., Dixon R.A. Variability in reaction time performance of younger and older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences. 57B:2002;101-115
20. Jarvis, B. (2002). DirectRT reaction time software (v2002). Available: www.empirisoft.com
21. Jensen H.J. Self-organized criticality. 1998;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England
22. Kello C.T. The emergence of a double dissociation in the modulation of a single control parameter in a nonlinear dynamical system. Cortex. 39:2003;132-134
23. Kelso J.A.S. Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. 1995;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
24. Kessler B., Treiman R. Relationship between sounds and letters in English monosyllables. Journal of Memory and Language. 44:2001;592-617
25. Lea P. Traumatic brain injury: Developmental differences in glutamate receptor response and the impact on treatment. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews. 7:2001;235-248
26. Moreno, M. A. (2002). A nonlinear dynamical systems perspective on response time distributions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe
27. Moreno M.A., Buchanan L., Van Orden G.C. Variability in aphasic patients' response times. Brain & Cognition. 48:2002;469-474
28. Morton J., Patterson K.E. A new attempt at an interpretation, or, an attempt at a new interpretation. Coltheart M., Patterson K., Marshall J.C. Deep dyslexia. 1980;Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
29. Pecher D. Perception is a two-way junction: Feedback semantics in word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 8:2001;545-551
30. Pexman P.M., Lupker S.J. Ambiguity and visual word recognition: Can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 53:1999;323-334
31. Pexman P.M., Lupker S.J., Hino Y. The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: Number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 9:2002;542-549
32. Plaut D.C., McClelland J.L., Seidenberg M.S., Patterson K. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review. 103:1996;56-115
33. Plaut D., Shallice T. Deep dyslexia: A case study of a connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 10:1993;377-500
34. Plourde C., Besner D. On the locus of the word frequency effect in visual word recognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 51:1997;181-194
35. Shallice T. From neuropsychology to mental structure. 1988;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
36. Shammi P., Bosman E., Stuss D.T. Aging and variability in performance. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition. 5:1998;1-13
37. Strain E., Patterson K., Seidenberg M.S. Semantic effects in single word naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 21:1995;1140-1154
38. Stuss D.T., Pogue J., Buckle L., Bondar J. Characterization of stability of performance in patients with traumatic brain injury: Variability and consistency on reaction time tests. Neuropsychology. 8:1994;316-324
39. Uttal W.R. The new phrenology: The limits of localizing cognitive processes in the brain. 2001;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
40. Van Orden G.C., Holden J.G. Intentional contents and self-control. Ecological Psychology. 14:2002;87-109
41. Van Orden G.C., Holden J.G., Turvey M.T. Self-organization of cognitive performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 132:2003;331-350
42. Van Orden G.C., Jansen op de Haar M.A., Bosman A.M.T. Complex dynamic systems also predict dissociations, but they do not reduce to autonomous components. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 14:1997;131-165
43. Van Orden G.C., Moreno M., Holden J.G. A proper metaphysics for cognitive performance. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences. 7:2003;47-58
44. Van Orden G.C., Pennington B.F., Stone G.O. What do double dissociations prove? Cognitive Science. 25:2001;111-172
45. Watkins M.J. Mediationism and the obfuscation of memory. American Psychologist. 45(3):1990;328-335