Power and sample size for DNA microarray studies

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 21, Issue 23, 2002, Pages 3543-3570

  Lee, Mei Ling Ting ^a,b,c   Whitmore, G A ^d  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bayesian inferences; False discovery rate; Family type I error; Microarray studies; Multiple testing; Power and sample size

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENTARY DNA; MORPHINE; OPIATE; PLACEBO;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA MICROARRAY; ERROR; EXPERIMENT; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; GENE EXPRESSION; KIDNEY POLYCYSTIC DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; MORPHINE ADDICTION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OPIATE ADDICTION; PROBABILITY; SAMPLE SIZE; STATISTICS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; DNA, COMPLEMENTARY; KIDNEY DISEASES, CYSTIC; MICE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MORPHINE; MUTATION; NARCOTICS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SAMPLE SIZE; SPINAL CORD; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 0037114470     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.1335     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Kerr MK, Churchill GA. Experimental design issues for gene expression microarrays. Biostatistics 2001; 2: 183-201.
2. Kerr MK, Martin M, Churchill GA. Analysis of variance for gene expression microarray data. Journal of Computational Biology 2001; 7:819-837.
3. Lee M-LT, Kuo FC, Whitmore GA, Sklar JL. Importance of replication in microarray gene expression studies: Statistical methods and evidence from repetitive cDNA hybridizations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2000; 97:9834-9839.
4. Lee M-LT, Lu W, Whitmore GA, Beier D. Models for microarray gene expression data. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 2002; 12:1-19.
5. Wolfinger RD, Gibson G, Wolfinger ED, Bennett L, Hamadeh H, Bushel P, Afshari C, Paules RS. Assessing gene significance from cDNA microarray expression data via mixed models. 2001, see http://brooks.statgen.ncsu.edu/ggibson/Pubs.htm.
6. Dudoit S, Yang YH, Callow MJ, Speed TP. Statistical methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in replicated cDNA microarray experiments. Technical report 578, 2000, Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. See http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/users/terry/zarray/Html/papersindex.html.
7. Efron B, Tibshirani R, Storey JD, Tusher V. Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2001; 96:1151-1160.
8. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1995; 57:289-300.
9. Delongchamp RR, Velasco C, Evans R, Harris A, Casciano D. Adjusting cDNA array data for nuisance effects. Division of Biometry and Risk Assessment, HFT-20, 2001, National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, Arkansas.
10. Schuchhardt J, Beule D, Malik A, Wolski E, Eickhoff H, Lehrach H, Herzel H. Normalization strategies for cDNA microarrays. Nucleic Acids Research 2000; 28(10):e47.
11. Lee M-LT, Whitmore GA, Yukhananov RY. Analysis of unbalanced microarray data. Journal of Data Science 2002; (in press).