American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase I. The effects of lossy data compression on recognition of diagnostic features in digital coronary angiography

European Heart Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 668-678

  Kerensky, R A ^d   Cusma, J T ^c   Kubilis, P ^d   Simon, R ^e   Bashore, T M ^b   Hirshfeld Jr , J W ^f   Holmes Jr , D R ^c   Pepine, C J ^d   Nissen, S E ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; CARDIOLOGY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY DISEASE; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034084888     PISSN: 0195668X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/euhj.1999.2100     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Cusma JT, Fortin DF, Spero LA, Groshong BR, Bashore TM. Which media are most likely to solve the archival problem? Int J Cardiac Imaging. 10:1994;165-175.
2. Karson TH, DeFranco A, Evans DJ. Replacement of cinefilm by digital angiography: clinical evaluation of a real-time optical storage system (abstr). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2:1993;56A.
3. Mancini, GBJ, Digital coronary angiography: advantages and limitations, Reiber, JHC, Serruys, PW, Quantitative Coronary Angiography, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1991, 23, 42.
4. Holmes DR, Wondrow MA, Bell MR, Nissen SE, Cusma JT. Cine film replacement: digital archive requirements and remaining obstacles. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 44:1998;346-356.
5. Rabbani M, Jones PW. Image compression techniques for medical diagnostic imaging systems. J Digit Imaging. 4:1991;65-78.
6. Bramble JM, Huang HK, Murphy MD. Image data compression. Invest Radiol. 23:1988;707-712.
7. J Am Coll Cardiol. 25:1995;800-802.
8. Nissen SE, Pepine CJ, Bashore TM. ACC Position Statement. Cardiac angiography without cine film: erecting a "tower of babel' in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol. 24:1994;834-837.
9. Pennebaker WB, Mitchell JL. JPEG Still Image Data Compression Standard. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. 1993.
10. Lane, TJ, Gladstone, P, Ortiz, L, Boucher, J, Crocker, L, Independent JPEG Group's free JPEG Software, Release 6a, 1996.
11. Van Lysel MS, Ergun DL, Miller WP. Cardiac digital angiography and dual-energy subtraction imaging: current and future trends. Am J Card Imaging. 1:1987;254-266.
12. Mistretta CA, Peppler WW. Digital cardiac x-ray image: fundamental priciples. Am J Card Imaging. 2:1988;26-39.
13. Brennecke R, Lang M, Fritsch JP, Erbel R, Meyer J. A framework for PACS development in cardiology. IEEE Comput Cardiol. 1992;259-261.
14. Condit PB. Requirements for cardiac interchange media and the role of recordable CD. Int J Card Imaging. 11:1995;153-157.
15. Whiting JS, Eckstein M, Morioka C, Staffel BK, Eigler NL. Lossy image compression has insignificant effect on the accuracy and precision of quantitative coronary angiography (abstr). Circulation. 88:1993;I-652.
16. Rigolin VH, Robiolio PA, Spero LA. Lossy Joint Photographic Expert's Group (JPEG) compression of digital coronary angiograms does not affect visual or quantitative assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity. Am J Cardiol. 78:1996;131-135.
17. Baker WA, Hearne SE, Spero LA. Lossy (15:1) JPEG compression of digital coronary angiograms does not limit detection of subtle morphological features. J Am Coll Cardiol. 96:1997;1157-1164.
18. Whiting J, Eckstein M, Honig D, Gu S, Einav S, Eigler N. Effect of lossy image compression on observer performance in dynamically displayed digital coronary angiograms (abstr). Circulation. 86:1992;I-444.
19. Zir LM, Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Gilbert JP, Harthorne JW. Interobserver variability in coronary angiography. Circulation. 53:1976;627-632.
20. DeRouen TA, Murray JA, Owen W. Variability in the analysis of coronary angiograms. Circulation. 55:1977;324-328.
21. Detre KM, Wright E, Murphy ML, Takaro T. Observer agreement in evaluating coronary angiograms. Circulation. 52:1975;979-985.
22. Beauman GJ, Vogel RA. Accuracy of individual and panel visual interpretations of coronary arteriograms: implications for clinical decisions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 16:1990;108-113.
23. Fisher LD, Judkins MP, Lesperance J. Reproducibility of coronary arteriographic reading in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 8:1982;565-575.