Ecosystem subsidies to Swedish food consumption from 1962 to 1994

Ecosystems

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 512-528

  Deutsch, Lisa ^a   Folke, Carl ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Agricultural intensification; Agriculture; Ecological footprint; Ecosystem performance; Food consumption; Vulnerability

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; FOOD CONSUMPTION; SUBSIDY SYSTEM; VULNERABILITY;

EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN; WORLD;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 25144493642     PISSN: 14329840     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-005-0035-4     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Altieri MA. 1999. The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agr Ecosyst Environ 74:19-31.
2. Andersson T, Folke C, Nyström S. 1995. Trading with the environment: ecology, economics, institutions and policy. London: Earthscan.
3. Bennett AJ. 2000. Environmental consequences of increasing production: some current perspectives. Agr Ecosyst Environ 82:89-95.
4. Björklund J, Limburg KE, Rydberg T. 1999. Impact of production intensity on the ability of the agricultural landscape to generate ecosystem services: an example from Sweden. Ecol Econ 29:269-91.
5. Bodin B, Ebbersten S, Eds. 1997. Food and fibers: sustainable agriculture, forestry and fishery. Booklet 4, Vol. 4. Uppsala: The Baltic University Programme, Uppsala University, 1-52.
6. Bolin O, Meyerson P-M, Ståhl I. 1986. The political economy of the food sector. Stockholm: SNS förlag.
7. Borgström G. 1965. The hungry planet: the modern world at the edge of famine. New York: MacMillian.
8. Carlsson A. 1995. Swedish food consumption and the environment - a trend analysis during the period of consumerism. Report no. 19. IMES/EESS.
9. Carlsson-Kanyama A. 1998. Food consumption patterns and their influence on climate change: greenhouse gas emissions in the life-cycle of tomatoes and carrots consumed in Sweden. Ambio 27:528-34.
10. Cleveland CJ. 1995. The direct and indirect use of fossil-fuels and electricity in USA agriculture, 1910-1990. Agr Ecosyst Environ 55:111-21.
11. Colinvaux P. 1986. Ecology. New York: Wiley.
12. Costanza R, Audley J, Borden R, Ekins P, Folke C, Funtowicz SO, Harris J. 1995. Sustainable trade - a new paradigm for world welfare. Environment 37:(16-20),39-44.
13. Daily G, Dasgupta P, Bolin B, Crosson P, du Guerny J, Ehrlich P, Folke C, Jansson AM, Jansson BO, Kautsky N, Kinzig A, Levin S, Maler KG, Pinstrup-Andersen P, Siniscalco D, Walker B. 1998. Global food supply - food production, population growth and the environment. Science 281:1291-2.
14. Daily GC, Ed. 1997. Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Covelo: Island Press.
15. Deutsch L. 1999. Ecosystem appropriation through industrial intensification and trade: Swedish agriculture 1962-1994. Technical report. Examensarbete 1999:3, Stockholm: Stockholm University.
16. Deutsch L, Jansson A, Troell M, Rönnback P, Folke C, Kautsky N. 2000. The 'ecological footprint': communicating human dependence on nature's work. Ecol Econ 32:351-5.
17. Ecological Economics. 2000. Commentary FORUM: the ecological footprint. Ecol Econ 32:341-94.
18. Elmgren R. 1984. Trophic dynamics in the enclosed, brackish Baltic Sea. Rapports et Proces-verbeaux des Réunions. Consiel International pour l'Exploration de la Mer.
19. Environment and Development Economics. 2001. Special issue: agroindustrialization, international development and the environment. Environ Dev Econ 6:415-531.
20. Eriksson J, Andersson A, Andersson R. 1997. Tillståndet i svensk åkermark. Report 4778. Naturvårdsverket (Swedish Environmental Protection Agency).
21. FAO. 1998. Fact sheets: agriculture and food security. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. URL: http://www.fao.org/ wfs/fs/e/Agricult/AgPro-e.htm.
22. FAO. 2000a. The State of Food and Agriculture 2000. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/x4400e/ x4400e00.htm.
23. FAO. 2000b. Commodity market review 1999-2000. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Commodities and trade division, Rome. URL: http://www.fao.org/es/ESC/esce/cmr/pdf/cmr99e.pdf.
24. FAO. 2001. Technical conversion factors for agricultural commodities. ESSB commodity trees. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. URL: http://www.fao.org/WAICENT/FAOINFO/ECONOMIC/ESS/tcf.htm.
25. FAOSTAT. 2001. FAOSTAT agricultural database collections. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. URL: http://apps.fao.org/ cgi-bin/nph-db.pl?subset=agriculture.
26. FAOSTAT. 2002. Food balance sheets. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. URL: http://apps.fao.org/lim500/nph-wrap.pl? FoodBalance-Sheet&Domain=FoodBalanceSheet.
27. Folke C. 1988. Energy economy of salmon aquaculture in the Baltic Sea. Environ Manage 12:525-37.
28. Folke C, Aneer G. 1988. Estimates of solar and auxiliary energy flows in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar L.) aquaculture in the Baltic Sea. Contributions from the Askö Laboratory No. 34. Stockholm: Askö Laboratory, University of Stockholm.
29. Folke C, Hammer M, Jansson AM. 1991. Life-support value of ecosystems: a case study of the Baltic Sea region. Ecol Econ 3:122-37.
30. Folke C, Jansson Å, Larsson J, Costanza R. 1997. Ecosystem appropriation by cities. Ambio 26:167-72.
31. Folke C, Kautsky N, Berg H, Jansson Å, Troell M. 1998. The ecological footprint concept for sustainable seafood production: a review. Ecol Appl 8:S63-71.
32. Gerbens-Leenes PW, Nonhebel S, Ivens WPMF. 2000. A method to determine land requirements relating to food consumption patterns. Agr Ecosyst Environ 90:47-58.
33. Gunderson L, Holling C, Light S, Eds. 1995. Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. New York: Columbia University Press.
34. Haberl H, Erb K-H, Krausmann F. 2001. How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: the case of Austria 1926-1995. Ecol Econ 38:25-45.
35. Hammer M. 1991. Marine ecosystem support to fisheries and fish trade. In: Folke C, Kåberger T, Eds. Linking the natural environment and the economy: essays from the Eco-Eco Group. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p 189-209.
36. Hansson C, Wackernagel M. 1999. Rediscovering place and accounting space: how to re-embed the human economy. Ecol Econ 29:203-21.
37. Hessel K, Kreuger J, Ulén B. 1997. Kartläggning av växtbekämpnings-rester i yt-, grund- och regnvatten i Sverige 1985-1995. Resultat från monitoring och riktad provtagning. Ekohydrologi 42. Uppsala: SLU.
38. Jansson AM, Zucchetto J. 1978. Energy, economic and ecological relationships for Gotland, Sweden: a regional systems study. Ecological Bulletins 28. Swedish Natural Science Research Council, Stockholm.
39. Jansson Å, Folke C, Langaas S. 1998. Quantification of the nitrogen retention capacity in natural wetlands in the Baltic drainage basin. Landscape Ecol 13:249-62.
40. Jansson Å, Folke C, Rockstrom J, Gordon L. 1999. Linking freshwater flows and ecosystem services appropriated by people: the case of the Baltic Sea drainage basin. Ecosystems 2:351-66.
41. Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Eds. 2001. Global environmental risk. London: Earthscan.
42. Larsson J, Folke C, Kautsky N. 1994. Ecological limitations and appropriation of ecosystem support by shrimp farming in Colombia. Environ Manage 18:663-76.
43. Larsson U, Elmgren R, Wulff F. 1985. Eutrophication and the Baltic Sea: causes and consequences. Ambio 14:9-14.
44. Lebel L, Tri NH, Saengnoree A, Pasong S, Buatama U, Thoa LK. 2002. Industrial transformation and shrimp aquaculture in Thailand and Vietnam: pathways to ecological, social, and economic sustainability? Ambio 31:311-23.
45. Lenzen M, Murray SA. 2001. A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia. Ecol Econ 37:229-55.
46. Matson PA, Parton WJ, Power AG, Swift MJ. 1997. Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277:504-642.
47. Naylor RL, Goldburg RJ, Primavera JH, Kautsky N, Beveridge MCM, Clay J, Folke C, Lubchenco J, Mooney H, Troell M. 2000. Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405:1017-24.
48. Odum EP. 1971. Fundamentals of ecology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co.,
49. Odum EP. 1975. Ecology: the link between the natural and social sciences. New York: Holt-Saunders.
50. Odum HT, Arding. 1991. Emergy analysis of shrimp mariculture in Ecuador. Working paper. Coastal Resources Center University of Rhode Island.
51. Pauly D, Christensen V. 1995. Primary production required to sustain global fisheries. Nature 374:255-7.
52. Postel S, Daily G, Ehrlich P. 1996. Human appropriation of renewable fresh water. Science 271:785-8.
53. Rees WE. 1992. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity. Environ Urban 4:120-30.
54. Rees WE. 2003. A blot on the land. Nature 421:898.
55. SCB. 1990. Statistiska meddelanden J 13 SM 9003. Stockholm: SCB.
56. SCB-JÅ. 1965-1998. Jordbruksstatistisk Årsbok. Stockholm: Statistiska centralbyrån.
57. SJV. 1989-1995. Foderstatistik. Produktion och förbrukning av foder. Jönköping: Jordbruksverket-Djurmiljöenheten/Foderkontrollen.
58. Statens Jordbruksnämnd. 1964. Redogörelsen för produktionen och förbrukningen av animaliskt fodermjöl, mineral- och vitaminfoder, foderblandningar för fjäderfän och svin m.fl. samt oljekraftfoder tiden juli 1963-juni 1964. A Albertson. Jönköping: Byrån för vegetabiliska produkter.
59. Statens Jordbruksnämnd. 1964/5-1983/4. Tabeller över produktion och förbrukning av fodermedel. Jönköping: Vegetabiliebyrå n.
60. Statens Jordbruksnämnd. 1965a. Jordbruksekonomiska Meddelanden 1965. Förbrukningen av animaliskt fodermjöl, vitamin- och mineralfoder samt oljekraftfoder m.fl. fodermedel och foderblandningar under de senaste 25 åren. Jönköping: A Albertson.
61. Statens Jordbruksnämnd. 1965b. 1961-1964: Redogörelse för produktion och användningen av animaliskt fodermjöl, vitaminfoder, foderblandningar för fjäderfän och svin m.fl.samt oljekraftfoder. A Albertson Jönköping.
62. Statens Jordbruksnämnd. 1984/5-1988/9. Tabeller över produktion och förbrukning av fodermedel. Jönköping: Lantbruksstyrelsen - Vegetabiliebyrån.
63. Tilman D. 1998. The greening of the green revolution. Nature 396:211-2.
64. Tilman D. 1999. Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: the need for sustainable and efficient practices. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5995-6000.
65. Tilman D, Fargione J, Wolff B, D'Antonio C, Dobson A, Howarth R, Schindler D, Schlesinger WH, Simberloff D, Swackhamer D. 2001. Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292:281-4.
66. Uhlin H-E. 1998. Why energy productivity is increasing: an I-O analysis of Swedish agriculture. Agr Syst 56:443-65.
67. USDA. 1992. Weights, measures, and conversion factors for agricultural commodities and their products ERS-AH-697. Washington (DC): United States Department of Agriculture.
68. van den Bergh JCJM, Verbruggen H. 1999. Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: an evaluation of the 'ecological footprint'. Ecol Econ 29:61-72.
69. van Vuuren DP, Smeets EMW. 2000. Ecological footprints of Benin, Bhutan, Costa Rica and the Netherlands. Ecol Econ 34:115-30.
70. Vitousek P, Mooney H, Lubchenco J, Melillo J. 1997. Human domination of Earth's ecosystems. Science 277:494-9.
71. Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, Callejas Linares A, Susana Lopez Falfan I, Mendez Garcia J, Isabel Suarez Guerrero A, Guadalupe Suarez Guerrero M. 1999. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecol Econ 29:375-90.
72. Waltner-Toews D, Lang T. 2000. A new conceptual base for food and agricultural policy: the emerging model of links between agriculture, food, health, environment and society. Global Chang Hum Health 1:116-30.
73. World Resources Institute. 2000. World resources 2000-2001, people and ecosystems: the fraying web of life. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
74. World Trade Organization. 2001. International trade statistics 2001. WTO Publications, Geneva. Switzerland. URL: http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/ statis_e/its2001_e/stats2001_e.pdf.