Comparative assessment of the acute skin irritation potential of detergent formulations using a novel human 4-h patch test method

Food and Chemical Toxicology

Volumn 43, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1703-1712

  Robinson, Michael K ^a   Kruszewski, Francis H ^b   Al Atrash, Jenan ^c   Blazka, Mark E ^d   Gingell, Ralph ^e   Heitfeld, Fred A ^f   Mallon, David ^g   Snyder, Neil K ^c   Swanson, Judith E ^h   Casterton, Phillip L ⁱ  

^a PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY   (United States)

^b Soap and Detergent Association   (United States)

^c RECKITT BENCKISER   (United Kingdom)

^d Technology Center   (United States)

^e USA   (United States)

^f JohnsonDiversey Inc   (United States)

^g UNILEVER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^h S C Johnson & Son Inc   (United States)

ⁱ Burdock Group   (United States)

Author keywords

Detergent; Irritation; Patch test; Skin

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM; DETERGENT; DISINFECTANT AGENT; DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM; SHAMPOO; SOAP;

ACUTE TOXICITY; ADULT; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPOSURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LIQUID; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATCH TEST; SEASONAL VARIATION; SKIN IRRITATION; SKIN MANIFESTATION; SKIN TOXICITY; TOXICITY TESTING; WINTER;

ADULT; AGED; DERMATITIS, IRRITANT; DETERGENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATCH TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SKIN IRRITANCY TESTS; SODIUM DODECYL SULFATE; TIME FACTORS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 25144492707     PISSN: 02786915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2005.05.012     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. D.A. Basketter, E. Whittle, H.A. Griffiths, and M. York The identification and classification of skin irritation hazard by a human patch test Food and Chemical Toxicology 32 1994 769 775
2. D. Basketter, L. Blaikie, and F. Reynolds The impact of atopic status on a predictive human test of skin irritation potential Contact Dermatitis 35 1996 33 39
3. D.A. Basketter, H.A. Griffiths, X.M. Wang, K.P. Wilhelm, and J. McFadden Individual, ethnic and seasonal variability in irritant susceptibility of skin: The implications for a predictive human patch test Contact Dermatitis 35 1996 208 213
4. D.A. Basketter, M. Chamberlain, H.A. Griffiths, M. Rowson, E. Whittle, and M. York The classification of skin irritants by human patch test Food and Chemical Toxicology 35 1997 845 852
5. J.H. Draize, G. Woodard, and H.O. Calvery Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 82 1944 377 390
6. ECVAM Statement on the application of the Epiderm™ human skin model for skin corrosivity testing ATLA-Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 28 2000 365 366
7. EEC Annex to Commission Directive 92/69/EEC of 31 July 1992 adapting to technical progress for the seventeenth time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances Official Journal of the European Communities L84 1992 36
8. EEC Annex I to Commission Directive 2000/33/EC adapting to technical progress for the 27th time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labeling of dangerous substances Journal of the European Communities L136 2000 91 97
9. EEC Directive 2003/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 February 2003 amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products Official Journal of the European Communities L066 2003 26 35
10. J.H. Fentem, and P.A. Botham ECVAM's activities in validating alternative tests for skin corrosion and irritation ATLA-Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 30 2002 61 67
11. J.H. Fentem, G.E.B. Archer, M. Balls, P.A. Botham, R.D. Curren, L.K. Earl, D.J. Esdaile, H.G. Holzhütter, and M. Liebsch The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for skin corrosivity. 2. Results and evaluation by the management team Toxicology In Vitro 12 1998 483 524
12. H.A. Griffiths, K.P. Wilhelm, M.K. Robinson, X.M. Wang, J. McFadden, M. York, and D.A. Basketter Interlaboratory evaluation of a human patch test for the identification of skin irritation potential/hazard Food and Chemical Toxicology 35 1997 255 260
13. ICCVAM, 2003. ICCVAM evaluation of EPISKIN™, EpiDerm™ (EPI-200), and the rat skin transcutaneous electrical resistance (TER) assay: in vitro test methods for assessing dermal corrosivity potential of chemicals. Internet Communication.
14. M.R. Judge, H.A. Griffiths, D.A. Basketter, I.R. White, R.J.G. Rycroft, and J.P. McFadden Variation in response of human skin to irritant challenge Contact Dermatitis 34 1996 115 117
15. J.P. McFadden, S.H. Wakelin, and D.A. Basketter Acute irritation thresholds in subjects with Type I-Type VI skin Contact Dermatitis 38 1998 147 149
16. G.A. Nixon, C.A. Tyson, and W.C. Wertz Interspecies comparisons of skin irritancy Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 31 1975 481 490
17. S.M. Patil, E. Patrick, and H.I. Maibach Animal, human, and in vitro test methods for predicting skin irritation F.N. Marzulli H.I. Mailbach Dermatotoxicology Methods 1998 Taylor & Francis Washington, DC 89 113
18. L. Phillips, M. Steinberg, H.I. Maibach, and W.A. Akers A comparison of rabbit and human skin response to certain irritants Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 21 1972 369 382
19. M.K. Robinson Racial differences in acute and cumulative skin irritation responses between Caucasian and Asian populations Contact Dermatitis 42 2000 134 143
20. M.K. Robinson Intra-individual variations in acute and cumulative skin irritation responses Contact Dermatitis 45 2001 75 83
21. M.K. Robinson Population differences in acute skin irritation responses-Race, sex, age, sensitive skin and repeat subject comparisons Contact Dermatitis 46 2002 86 93
22. M.K. Robinson, M.A. Perkins, and D.A. Basketter Application of a 4-h human patch test method for comparative and investigative assessment of skin irritation Contact Dermatitis 38 1998 194 202
23. M.K. Robinson, E. Whittle, and D.A. Basketter A two-center study of the development of acute irritation responses to fatty acids American Journal of Contact Dermatitis 10 1999 136 145
24. M.K. Robinson, J.P. McFadden, and D.A. Basketter Validity and ethics of the human 4-h patch test as an alternative method to assess acute skin irritation potential Contact Dermatitis 45 2001 1 12
25. M.K. Robinson, C. Cohen, A.D. de Fraissinette, M. Ponec, E. Whittle, and J.H. Fentem Non-animal testing strategies for assessment of the skin corrosion and skin irritation potential of ingredients and finished products Food and Chemical Toxicology 40 2002 573 592
26. R.A. Tupker Detergents and cleansers P.G.M. van der Valk H.I. Maibach The Irritant Contact Dermatitis Syndrome 1996 CRC Press Boca Raton 71 76
27. A.P. Walker, D.A. Basketter, M. Baverel, W. Diembeck, W. Matthies, D. Mougin, M. Paye, R. Rothlisberger, and J. Dupuis Test guidelines for assessment of skin compatibility of cosmetic finished products in man Food and Chemical Toxicology 34 1996 651 660
28. E. Whittle, M.D. Barratt, J.A. Carter, D.A. Basketter, and M. Chamberlain Skin corrosivity potential of fatty acids: In vitro rat and human skin testing and QSAR studies Toxicology In Vitro 10 1996 95 100
29. M. York, H.A. Griffiths, E. Whittle, and D.A. Basketter Evaluation of a human patch test for the identification and classification of skin irritation potential Contact Dermatitis 34 1996 204 212