A framework for resolving the transboundary water allocation conflict conundrum

Ground Water

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 700-705

  Rowland, Marty ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; PUBLIC POLICY; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; WATER ALLOCATION; WATER MANAGEMENT;

WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS;

GROUNDWATER; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER RELATIONS; WATER RESOURCE; WATER SUPPLY;

CONFERENCE PAPER; CONFLICT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROBLEM SOLVING; THEORETICAL MODEL; WATER SUPPLY;

CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OWNERSHIP; PROBLEM SOLVING; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 25144450525     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2005.00066.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Aggarwal, R.M., and T.A. Narayan. 2004. Does inequality lead to greater efficiency in the use of local commons? The role of strategic investments in capacity. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47, January: 163-182.
2. Agrawal, A. 2002. Common resources and institutional sustainability. In The Drama of the Commons, ed. E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P.C. Stern, S. Stonich, and E. Weber, 41-85. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
3. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 2003. Experts discuss global water strategies at international roundtable. ASCE News 28, no. 12: 21-22.
4. Baland, J., and J. Platteau. 1996. Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is There a Role for Rural Communities? Oxford, U.K.: Clarendon Press.
5. Bromley, D.W. 2004. Property rights: Locke, Kant, Peirce and the logic of volitional pragmatism. In Private Property in the 21st Century: The Future of an American Ideal, ed. H.M. Jacobs, 19-30. Northampton, Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
6. Bromley, D.W. 1991. Environment and Economy: Property Rights and Public Policy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.
7. Dellapenna, J.W. 2001. The customary international law of transboundary fresh waters. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues 1, no. 3/4: 264-305.
8. Dietz, D., N. Dolsak, E. Ostrom, and P.C. Stern. 2002. The drama of the commons. In The Drama of the Commons, ed. E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P.C. Stern, S. Stonich, and E. Weber, 3-39. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
9. Dudley, N., and S. Stolton. 2003. Running Pure: The Importance of Forest Protected Areas to Drinking Water. Washington, D.C.: World Bank and World Wildlife Fund Alliance for Forest Conservation and Sustainable Use.
10. Eckstein, G., and Y. Eckstein. 2003. A hydrogeological approach to transboundary ground water resources and international law. American University International Law Review 19, no. 201: 201-258.
11. Frederick, K.D. 1996. Water as a source of international conflict. Resources 123. http://www.rff.org/resources_articles.
12. Gleick, P. 2000. Water conflict chronology. Internet electronic text. http://www.worldwater.org/conflict.htm.
13. Hardin, G. 1968. Tragedy of the commons. Science 162, no. 3859: 1243-1248.
14. Hebard, E.M. 1998. Toward jointly managing a transboundary aquifer: Creating a binational dialogue through community participation and education. Arid Lands Newsletter, no. 44. http://ag.arizona.edu/OALS/ALN/aln44/hebardfinal. html.
15. Houge, C. 2003. Rocket-fueled river; Lower Colorado carries perchlorate to millions who drink its water, to those who eat lettuce irrigated with its water, and into a tribal well. Chemical & Engineering News 81, no. 33: 37-46.
16. Jagerskog, A. 2002. Contributions of regime theory in understanding interstate water co-operation: Lessons learned in the Jordan River basin. In Hydropolitics in the Developing World: Southern African Perspective, ed. A. Turton and R. Henwood, 73-78. Pretoria, South Africa: University of Pretoria African Water Issues Research Unit.
17. Kliot, N., D. Shmueli, and U. Shamir. 2001. Development of institutional frameworks for the management of transboundary water resources. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues 1, no. 3/4: 306-328.
18. Mann, H. 2003. Reclaiming water as a public good in the post NAFTA era: International Trade and Investment Law considerations. Unpublished paper presented at the 3rd World Water Forum, Day of the Americas, Kyoto, Japan.
19. National Research Council (NRC). 2002. The Drama of the Commons; Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change, ed. E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P.C. Stern, S. Stonich, and E. Weber. Washington, D.C.: Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Academy Press.
20. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
21. Ostrom, E., P.C. Stern, and T. Dietz. 2003. Water rights in the commons. Water Resources IMPACT 5, no. 2: 9-12.
22. Rowland, M. 2000a. The evolution of two water resource management systems: Case studies of Tampa Bay and the Middle East. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 11, no. 2: 411-469.
23. Rowland, M.A. 2000b. The evolution of water resource management systems: Case studies of the Tampa Bay region of Florida and Baton Rouge area of Louisiana. Ph.D. diss., College of Urban and Public Affairs, University of New Orleans. UMI Dissertation Services. http://www.bellhowell.infolearning.com.
24. Schonfeld, R., and J. Dobinson. 2004. Using international standards: A wake-up call to regulators? ASTM Standardization News 32, no. 1: 33-35.
25. Stern, P.C., T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, E. Ostrom, and S. Stonich. 2002. Knowledge and questions after 15 years of research. In The Drama of the Commons, ed. E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P.C. Stern, S. Stonich, and E. Weber, 445-489. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
26. Tampa Bay Water. 2004. Pasco County reaps benefits of pumping cutbacks: Pasco wellfield pumping cut by three-and-a-half times requirement. Clearwater, Florida: Tampa Bay Water. http://www.tampabaywater.org/WEB/Htm/News/news-item38. htm (accessed June 21, 2004).
27. Thorson, J.E. 2003. Visions of sustainable interstate water management agreements. Natural Resources Journal 43, no. 2: 347-371.
28. Turton, A., and R. Henwood, ed. 2002. Hydropolitics in the Developing World: Southern African Perspective. Pretoria, South Africa: University of Pretoria African Water Issues Research Unit.
29. United Nations. 2002. Global challenge, global opportunity: Trends in sustainable development (Johannesburg Summit 2002). Internet electronic text. p. 11. http://www.un.org/jsummit/html/documents/summit_docs/criticaltrends_1408. pdf.
30. Vinogradov, S., and V. P. E. Langford. 2001. Managing transboundary water resources in the Aral Sea Basin: In search of a solution. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues 1, no. 3/4: 345-362.
31. Wade, R. 1988. Village Republics: Economic Conditions for Collective Action in South India. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
32. Wester, P., and J. Warner. 2002. River basin management reconsidered. In Hydropolitics in the Developing World: Southern African Perspective, ed. A. Turton and R. Henwood, 61-71. Pretoria, South Africa: University of Pretoria African Water Issues Research Unit.