Purpose, power and constraint in the primary curriculum: The Taylor Report, 1974

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 5-11

  Hayes, Denis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944590378     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03004270285200031     Document Type: Note

References (11)

1. Eisner, E.W., 2000. Those who ignore the past: twelve easy lessons for the next millennium. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32 (2): 34-57.
2. Galton, M., Simon, B., and Croll, P., 1980. Inside the Primary Classroom, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
3. Gretton, J., and Jackson, M., 1976. William Tyndale: Collapse of a School or a System?, London: George, Allen and Unwin/Times Educational Supplement.
4. Hayes, D., 2001 a. Professional status and an emerging culture of conformity amongst teachers in England. Education 3-13, 29 (1): 43-49.
5. Hayes, D., 2001 b. Motivation for teaching: A questionnaire survey among BEd student primary teachers, Rolle School of Education, University of Plymouth.
6. McCaIIum, B., Gipps, C., and Hargreaves, E., 2001. The structure of lessons. Education 3-13, 29 (1): 33-37.
7. Norris, R., 1995. Teacher education: continuity. challenge and change. Curriculum, 16 (2): 95-101.
8. Parker-Rees, R., 2000. Time to relax a little: making time for the interplay of minds in education. Education 3-13, 28 (1): 29-35.
9. Purves, L., 2001. Thoughts for worms on the turn. Times Educational Supplement, 1446 September: 64-64. 14th
10. Sweetman, J., 1992. Curriculum Confidential Three, Tamworth: Bracken Press.
11. Taylor, P.H., Reid, W.A., Holley, B.J., and Exon, G., 1974. Purpose. Power and Constraint in the Primary School Curriculum, Basingstoke: Macmillan Education/Schools Council.